That’s right. Murt is allowing his moderators to engage in elicit activity while using his paltalk room, and Tinkerbell is defending her sister, CONVICTED sex offender, Windchime (BreezySeas45) aka Terri Cavitalo. Windchime had been a longtime administrator at Websleuths, until today. I applaud Tricia for doing the right thing and removing her from the community [...]
WHEN THIS LITTLE GEM CAME OUT BY YOUR "NEW BUDDY" I WENT TO BAT FOR YOU EVEN AFTER THIS ARTICLE WOUND UP ON AT LEAST 30 DIFFERENT BLOGS. I KEPT YOU AS A MOD EVEN AFTER AT LEAST 30 PM'S AND E-MAILS I RECIEVED DEMANDING YOUR IMMEDIATE REMOVAL. YOU WOULD BE SUPRISED AT WHO SOME OF THOSE WERE WHO SENT THE DEMANDS. I GUESS YOU NEED TO FIND OUT THE HARD WAY.
YOUR ACTIONS ARE WHAT I GET IN RETURN. AS I HAVE ALWAYS SAID IN OUR LITTLE MEETING TINK " I DO NOT TRUST ANYONE ON THE INTERNET AND THAT INCLUDES MY MODS."
I CAN SEE NOW THAT MY LACK OF TRUST IN YOU, AND NANANC WAS JUSTIFIED.
UNLIKE NANA AND THE OTHERS, I WILL NOT BE CONTACTING ANYONE ABOUT YOUR SISTER IN SPITE OF THE THREATS AGAINST ME.
HAVE FUN DESTROYING ME WITH YOUR NEW FOUND "FRIEND" AND WHILE YOU ARE AT IT ASK HER THIS QUESTION.
WHY IS THAT ARTICLE STILL ON BEACONHELL.COM IN PUBLIC? YOU "YOU PALED UP WITH HER IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT SHE DID NOT TAKE THIS ARTICLE DOWN?
AN ARTICLE THAT IS STILL IN THE PUBLIC AREA ABLE TO BE FOUND BY ENTERING THE SINGLE WORD "WINDCHIME" WITH THE SAME PUBLIC RECORDS THAT WERE PUT UP BEFORE?
IS THAT WHAT YOU REALLY THINK OF YOUR SISTER?
THIS IS THE PART I DO NOT GET. YOU RAIL AGAINST ME AND MY BRIEF ARTICLE THAT WAS MEANT TO PROVE TO YOU WHO THE TRUE PROBLEM WAS. I DID NOT WRITE THAT ARTICLE, I ONLY LINKED IT AND ADDED A COMMENT.
THIS BLOG IS READ BY LESS THAN A DOZEN PEOPLE YET THE ARTICLE ON WINDCHIME IS ON SEVERAL MUCH LARGER BLOGS.
REMEMBER THAT AND ALL THE THINGS I DID WHEN I CAME TO YOUR DEFENSE. I WILL AND WILL REMEMBER NOT TO MAKE THAT MISTAKE WITH ANYONE ELSE EVER AGAIN.
MURT
F
WHEN THIS LITTLE GEM CAME OUT BY YOUR "NEW BUDDY" I WENT TO BAT FOR YOU EVEN AFTER THIS ARTICLE WOUND UP ON AT LEAST 30 DIFFERENT BLOGS. I KEPT YOU AS A MOD EVEN AFTER AT LEAST 30 PM'S AND E-MAILS I RECIEVED DEMANDING YOUR IMMEDIATE REMOVAL. YOU WOULD BE SUPRISED AT WHO SOME OF THOSE WERE WHO SENT THE DEMANDS. I GUESS YOU NEED TO FIND OUT THE HARD WAY.
YOUR ACTIONS ARE WHAT I GET IN RETURN. AS I HAVE ALWAYS SAID IN OUR LITTLE MEETING TINK " I DO NOT TRUST ANYONE ON THE INTERNET AND THAT INCLUDES MY MODS."
I CAN SEE NOW THAT MY LACK OF TRUST IN YOU, AND NANANC WAS JUSTIFIED.
UNLIKE NANA AND THE OTHERS, I WILL NOT BE CONTACTING ANYONE ABOUT YOUR SISTER IN SPITE OF THE THREATS AGAINST ME.
HAVE FUN DESTROYING ME WITH YOUR NEW FOUND "FRIEND" AND WHILE YOU ARE AT IT ASK HER THIS QUESTION.
WHY IS THAT ARTICLE STILL ON BEACONHELL.COM IN PUBLIC? YOU "YOU PALED UP WITH HER IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT SHE DID NOT TAKE THIS ARTICLE DOWN?
AN ARTICLE THAT IS STILL IN THE PUBLIC AREA ABLE TO BE FOUND BY ENTERING THE SINGLE WORD "WINDCHIME" WITH THE SAME PUBLIC RECORDS THAT WERE PUT UP BEFORE?
IS THAT WHAT YOU REALLY THINK OF YOUR SISTER?
THIS IS THE PART I DO NOT GET. YOU RAIL AGAINST ME AND MY BRIEF ARTICLE THAT WAS MEANT TO PROVE TO YOU WHO THE TRUE PROBLEM WAS. I DID NOT WRITE THAT ARTICLE, I ONLY LINKED IT AND ADDED A COMMENT.
THIS BLOG IS READ BY LESS THAN A DOZEN PEOPLE YET THE ARTICLE ON WINDCHIME IS ON SEVERAL MUCH LARGER BLOGS.
REMEMBER THAT AND ALL THE THINGS I DID WHEN I CAME TO YOUR DEFENSE. I WILL AND WILL REMEMBER NOT TO MAKE THAT MISTAKE WITH ANYONE ELSE EVER AGAIN.
MURT
