I SEEM TO RECALL A WHILE BACK THAT "FRANK" MADE A POST ACCUSING ME OF USING FOUL LANGUAGE TOWARDS "DEFENSELESS" WOMEN.
HE ALSO MADE THE POINT OF ME BEING A MALE AND PICKING ON, AGAIN "DEFENSELESS" WOMEN AND USING DEMEANING TERMS TOWARDS THESE SAME WOMEN.
WHAT "FRANK" SEEMS TO IGNORE IS THAT THE "OTHER WOMEN" USE LANGUAGE THAT IS FAR WORSE THAN I EVER THINK OF USING TOWARD WOMEN.
THIS IS THE ONLY REASON I ALLOWED THE DEMEANING AND EXPLITIVE FILLED POST DIRECTED AT AGRANNY TO BE POSTED.
IT IS ONE OF MANY POSTS BY FRANK MADE TOWARDS HER, THAT HAD TO GO UNPUBLISHED DUE TO THE VILE AND DEMEANING LANGUAGE FRANK SPEWS FORTH.
FRANK AND "HIS" COHORTS ARE HYPOCRITES. "HE" AND THEY WHINE AND CRY ABOUT WHAT WE DO AND YET THEY DO THE SAME. IN REALITY THEY ARE THE ONES WHO BEGAN USING THIS KIND OF LANGUAGE.
THEY SET THE STANDARD AND ALL WE DID WAS TO SPEAK "THEIR LANGUAGE."
THEREIN ENDITH THE LESSON
MURT
Friday, May 7, 2010
LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE
I HAVE BEEN SENT A CERTAIN LINK WHERE THE "NEW" OPERATOR OF A CERTAIN BLOG IS USING THE EXCUSE THAT SOME POOR PITIFUL LITTLE PERSON IN WEST FLORIDA DID NOT LIKE HIS NAME MENTIONED BY A COMMENT OR TWO ON THIS BLOG.
THIS IS INTERESTING SINCE THE SAME BLOG HAS CONTAINED WITHIN IT A CHAT WHERE CERTAIN NAMES WERE MENTIONED OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN NONSTOP SINCE THIS SO CALLED TRUCE WAS INITIATED.
THE ENTRY IN QUESTION IS DATED MAY 3.
NOW, INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, THE PERSON WENT ON TO NOTE THAT I HAVE HAD FEW IF ANY COMMENTS TO THE "MAINSTREAM" POSTS THAT I PUT UP.
WELL, THE "PERSON" DOES NOT SEEM TO UNDERSTAND THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL CHATS, ALL BUT ONE OR TWO THAT ARE PRIVATE AS WELL AS A NUMBER OF PRIVATE SITES WHERE COMMENTS ARE MADE REGARDING WHAT IT IS THAT IS IN EACH OF THE ARTICLES THE PERSON MENTIONED.
I AM NOT ON THIS BLOG FOR A READ AND COUNT CONTEST. IF NOBODY READS THIS THING, "OH WELL."
I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THIS IS THE SMALLEST AND LEAST SIGNIFICANT BLOG ON THE ENTIRE INTERNET. I HAVE MADE THIS QUITE CLEAR QUITE A FEW TIMES. THIS IS A PERSONAL BLOG, NOT A SUPPORT BLOG FOR A MEDIA OUTLET SUCH AS CNN OR FOX NEWS.
NOW IT SEEMS RATHER ODD TO ME THAT THIS "PERSON" WOULD CLAIM THAT IT WAS MY BLOG OR SUPPORTERS WHO BROKE THIS SO CALLED TRUCE LAID DOWN BY THE OWNER OF THE BLOG.
ACCORDING TO THE SCREEN SHOTS, IT WAS THE OTHER PERSON'S BLOG AND NOT MINE NOR ANY OF MY SUPPORTERS WHO BROKE THIS SO CALLED TRUCE.
I GUESS ANY EXCUSE TO GET THEIR TRAFFIC UP IS IN ORDER AND I AM AGAIN THE THREATENED TARGET OF THEIR NONSENSE.
OH WELL AS SOMEONE SEEMS TO ALWAYS SAY
"THE TRUTH NEVER LIES"
STAY TUNED
MURT
THIS IS INTERESTING SINCE THE SAME BLOG HAS CONTAINED WITHIN IT A CHAT WHERE CERTAIN NAMES WERE MENTIONED OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN NONSTOP SINCE THIS SO CALLED TRUCE WAS INITIATED.
THE ENTRY IN QUESTION IS DATED MAY 3.
NOW, INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, THE PERSON WENT ON TO NOTE THAT I HAVE HAD FEW IF ANY COMMENTS TO THE "MAINSTREAM" POSTS THAT I PUT UP.
WELL, THE "PERSON" DOES NOT SEEM TO UNDERSTAND THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL CHATS, ALL BUT ONE OR TWO THAT ARE PRIVATE AS WELL AS A NUMBER OF PRIVATE SITES WHERE COMMENTS ARE MADE REGARDING WHAT IT IS THAT IS IN EACH OF THE ARTICLES THE PERSON MENTIONED.
I AM NOT ON THIS BLOG FOR A READ AND COUNT CONTEST. IF NOBODY READS THIS THING, "OH WELL."
I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THIS IS THE SMALLEST AND LEAST SIGNIFICANT BLOG ON THE ENTIRE INTERNET. I HAVE MADE THIS QUITE CLEAR QUITE A FEW TIMES. THIS IS A PERSONAL BLOG, NOT A SUPPORT BLOG FOR A MEDIA OUTLET SUCH AS CNN OR FOX NEWS.
NOW IT SEEMS RATHER ODD TO ME THAT THIS "PERSON" WOULD CLAIM THAT IT WAS MY BLOG OR SUPPORTERS WHO BROKE THIS SO CALLED TRUCE LAID DOWN BY THE OWNER OF THE BLOG.
ACCORDING TO THE SCREEN SHOTS, IT WAS THE OTHER PERSON'S BLOG AND NOT MINE NOR ANY OF MY SUPPORTERS WHO BROKE THIS SO CALLED TRUCE.
I GUESS ANY EXCUSE TO GET THEIR TRAFFIC UP IS IN ORDER AND I AM AGAIN THE THREATENED TARGET OF THEIR NONSENSE.
OH WELL AS SOMEONE SEEMS TO ALWAYS SAY
"THE TRUTH NEVER LIES"
STAY TUNED
MURT
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)