The twitter posts point out both a contradiction and how hypocritical Princess and the nut cases around her are.
It seems that the farther away I get from Missing children cases the more intense the attacks are. It would seem to me (and others who have made this observation) that THEY DO NOT want me to back away from the missing children cases since that would no longer give them a mission and thus keep these attacks going in order to goad me into covering them "out of spite"
Well, sorry to disappoint the haters. My original plan was to use the broadcasts to showcase the lighter side of Florida and NOT to get so involved in the Caylee Anthony case. Now as time goes forward, I am going to TRY and shift the focus of the room and broadcasts toward the lighter side of Florida and NOT with the bad news cases that seem to plague the area.
I plan on covering such things as folk festivals, nature walks and any interesting aspect of Florida that might be of interest to my chat members.
I really do not understand all of this attention and DESPITE the claims of Beaconhell and her fellow loonies, I DO NOT WANT IT.
Beaconhell has a huge blog yet she WASTES her time with my tiny chat room. SOMETHING DOES NOT ADD UP.
She has an unhealthy obsession and should seek professional help to get her back to normal.
Perhaps after she sees how boring the room is going to be she can move on and get a life. Somehow I doubt it. Her blogs are NOTHING without me.
MURT
Thursday, September 17, 2009
THE STALKER CHRONICLES, A CONTINUING UPDATE.
This is probably one of the first timesI have used a comment as a primary source in an article. However, the claims made by this poster are, to put it mildly alarming and this this needs to be addressed.
I recieved the following post in reply to the article I did involving Princess and HER stalking.
Murt please pay attention to what you say .. Broadband air cards ARE Wifi. Wifi is not a brand name it means wireless which in fact you are while using an air card. This air card still will NOT register the IP address of your home location so why do you keep trying to say it will? The ip addresses posted by princess on twitter show indefinitely that you were in fact at home, not fueling not on location and not on a plane you were sitting at home. Why didn't you post my comment? That's alright i copied it and sent to others in case you didn't post the initial comment.
Why try to lie murt? You were not on a plane with your computer you were at home, in fact i have someone that places you at home during these supposed trips, not just one.. but every single trip you allegedly went on were lies. You were seen at your home.
You cannot connect to your home connection while fueling up without sitting at your home computer and clicking the button to authorize the remote access so either way you slice it Murt your a liar
NOW, LET US BREAK DOWN THIS MESSAGE TO THE IMPORTANT PARTS. FIRST, I ALREADY ADDRESSED THE FACT THAT THIS WAS NOT A WI FI CARD BUT WAS IN FACT THE SAME BROADBAND CARD I USE THROUGH VERIZON TO BROADCAST ON THE ROAD.
The ip addresses posted by princess on twitter show indefinitely that you were in fact at home, not fueling not on location and not on a plane you were sitting at home.
NOW, AS SOME OF YOU MIGHT REMEMBER THERE ARE POSTS ON BEACONHELL TWITTER THAT HAS A TRACER SHOWING THAT SOMEONE WITH THE IP OF MY EMBARQ ACCOUNT WAS ON HER BLOG. CORRECT. WHAT PRINCESS FORGETS IS THAT I HAVE MORE THAN ONE COMPUTER AT HOME WITH THE PC ANYWHERE SOFTWARE ON IT (ACTYUALLY A POORMANS FREEWARE VERSION OF REMOTE ACCESS SOFTWARE , ASK MONO, HE KNOWS ALL ABOUT IT.
THIS SOFTWARE ALLOWS ME TO REMOTELY ACCESS MY HOME PC WHILE USING MY VERIZON CARD AND RUN MY DESKTOP AS IF IT WERE AT THE HOUSE. I WAS TESTING IT ON HER BLOG BECAUSE SHE HAS ME BANNED AND IT IS AN EASY WAY TO SEE IF THE LINK IS WORKING. HAD I USED VERIZON, I WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GET THROUGH.
You were not on a plane with your computer you were at home, in fact i have someone that places you at home during these supposed trips, not just one.. but every single trip you allegedly went on were lies. You were seen at your home.
THIS IS THE ALARMING PART. HOW WOULD SOMEONE KNOW IF I WERE HOME OR NOT?, WHICH BY THE WAY IS NOT TRUE.
THE LOCAL SHERIFF WILL BE INTERESTED SINCE I AM TAKING THIS PRINTOUT ALONG WITH THE TRESPASS WARNING WITH ME TO TAVARES IF I DO NOT GET AN IMMEDIATE EXPLINATION.
PRINCESS MADE THIS POST ON TWITTER THAT STATES
@ChristinaL419 His neighbors said that he never left the hood. hahahaabout 20 hours ago from TweetDeck in reply to ChristinaL419
THIS IS AN ALARMING ADMISSION IF SHE IN FACT CONTACTED ANYONE AROUND MY HOUSE TO DETERMINE MY WHEREABOUTS. THIS STATEMENT, IN FACT, IS A LIE BECAUSE NOBODY SAID ANY SUCH THING.
THIS, ALONG WITH SOME OF HER OTHER CLAIMS IS CLEAR CUT PROOF OF CRIMINAL STALKING. IF I HAD MADE SUCH A COMMENT ABOUT HER SHE WOULD BE CRYING "IRS IRS IRS IRS."
SHE THEN HAS A TWITTER SITE, AMONG SEVERAL WHERE SHE OBSESSES ABOUT ME:
http://twitter.com/Tards_United
IN POST AFTER POST (NOTICE NUMBER TALLY BY USERNAME) SHE PROVES HER STALKING OF ME EVEN USING OLD PHOTOS OF MY PROPERTY OFF GOOGLE EARTH.
THE DEGREE OF HER STALKING REMAINS HIDDEN BEHIND A PASSWORD PROTECT HIGHLY RESTRICED WALL OF SECRECY IN AT LEAST TWO INTERNET LOCATIONS. PROOF OF UNLAWFUL CONDUCT BY HER AND HER MEMBERS ARE DOCUMENTED THERE.
SHE USES THREATS TO PREVENT THE RELEASE OF THAT INFORMATION.
THIS IS THE ACT OF A TRULY DANGEROUS PERSON. ANYONE SHOULD BE WARY OF ANY CONTACT WITH HER.
I DO INTEND TO ASK THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT WHAT TO DO ABOUT THIS AND THE OTHER STATEMENTS.
SINCE I ONLY HAVE A FEW NEIGHBORS, IT SHOULD BE EASY TO CHECK HER CLAIMS OUT.
UPDATE: "ZEN" IMMEDIATELY CAME UP WITH A FAIRY TALE TO HIDE HER MISSTATEMENTS (LIES) BY CLAIMING THAT A PERSON ON ANOTHER BLOG IS A FRIEND WHO LIVES NEAR BY (KNOWS ME) AND WAS VISITING ANOTHER FRIEND (WHO SEEMINGLY MONITORS MY MOVEMENTS 24/7 AND REPORTS BACK TO HER AND BEACONHELL.
NOW IF THAT WERE TRUE, WE WOULD HAVE EVEN MORE CLEAR CUT PROOF OF THEIR CRIMINAL STALKING.
WITHOUT THE ZEN(PRINCESS) FAIRY TALE, THERE IS AMPLE PROOF OF HER STALKING.
You cannot connect to your home connection while fueling up without sitting at your home computer and clicking the button to authorize the remote access so either way you slice it Murt your a liar
THIS SHOWS THE PERSON'S TOTAL LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF INTERNET TECHNOLOGY AND THAT THE TERM "AIRCARD" IS USED BY SOME PEOPLE TO DESCRIBE THE CELLPHONE BASED CARD (IN MY CASE VERISON) TO ACCESS THE INTERNET.
SHE CLAIMS THAT SHE CANNOT OBTAIN MY STREET ADDRESS? PERHAPS NOT THROUGH THE ACCOUNT WITH MY INTERNET PROVIDER, BUT THROUGH SEARCHING MY ACTIVITIES ON THE INTERNET OVER THE YEARS.
IN HER PRIVATE BLOG IS DOCUMENT WHERE SHE ASKED FOR AND RECEIVED CONTACT INFORMATION THAT INCLUDED MY UNLISTED PHONE NUMBERS AND STREET ADDRESS FOR MY RESIDENCE. OLD PICTURES OF THE RESIDENCE NOW ARE PLASTERED ALL OVER THE LINK. THOSE PHOTOGRAPHS AMONG OTHERS ALSO DEMONSTRATE HOW IMAGES CAN BE ALTERED.
HER SKILLS AT ALTERING TEXT MESSAGES FROM MANY DIFFERENT SOURCES ARE ALSO DOCUMENTED WITHIN HER PRIVATE MESSAGE AND ARCHIVE SITES.
ALSODATA MINING WITH THE KNOWLEDGE OF SOMEONE'S IP ADDRESS CAN PROVIDE CLUES FOR SOMEONE PERSISTANT ENOUGH, TO EVENTUALLY FIND WHAT THEY WANT.
DO REMEMBER THAT SHE CLAIMED TO BE ABLE TO TELL I WAS HOME BY THE USE OF MY IP NUMBER?
REGARDING THE STATEMENT ABOUT HAVING TO MANUALY ALLOW ACCESS TO THE HOST COMPUTER:
ANYONE READING THIS BLOG IS ACCESSING A SERVER THAT COULD BE HUNDREDS IF NOT THOUSANDS OF MILES AWAY FROM YOUR HOME. I DOUBT THERE IS SOME GUY IN AN OFFICE SOMEPLACE CHECKING 'OK" AFTER READING YOUR PASSWORD.
THE SOFTWARE I HAVE BEEN PROVIDED WITH IS A FREEWARE REMOTE ACCESS UTILITY THAT ALLOWS SOMEONE TO ACCESS A HOST PC USING A USERNAME AND PASSWORD JUST LIKE ONE USES TO ACCESS A PASSWORD PROTECTED SITE.
IN THIS WAY ONE CAN USE THE HOST COMPUTER AS A PROXY SERVER.
PRINCESS IS QUITE FAMILAR WITH WHAT PROXY SERVERS ARE.
JUST BECAUSE AN ANON SAYS SOMETHING DUMB LIKE THIS, DOES NOT MAKE IT TRUE..
ALL OF YOU REMEMBER WHEN I WARNED YOU ABOUT LOGGING ON ANY OF BEACOHELL OWNED SITE?
NOW YOU KNOW WHY. SHE HAS A HUGE LIBRARY OF INFORMATION ON A LOT OF PEOPLE DUE TO HAVING THEIR IP ADDRESS. USE EXTREME CAUTION VISITING ANY OF HER SITES.
MURT
Publish this comment.
I recieved the following post in reply to the article I did involving Princess and HER stalking.
Murt please pay attention to what you say .. Broadband air cards ARE Wifi. Wifi is not a brand name it means wireless which in fact you are while using an air card. This air card still will NOT register the IP address of your home location so why do you keep trying to say it will? The ip addresses posted by princess on twitter show indefinitely that you were in fact at home, not fueling not on location and not on a plane you were sitting at home. Why didn't you post my comment? That's alright i copied it and sent to others in case you didn't post the initial comment.
Why try to lie murt? You were not on a plane with your computer you were at home, in fact i have someone that places you at home during these supposed trips, not just one.. but every single trip you allegedly went on were lies. You were seen at your home.
You cannot connect to your home connection while fueling up without sitting at your home computer and clicking the button to authorize the remote access so either way you slice it Murt your a liar
NOW, LET US BREAK DOWN THIS MESSAGE TO THE IMPORTANT PARTS. FIRST, I ALREADY ADDRESSED THE FACT THAT THIS WAS NOT A WI FI CARD BUT WAS IN FACT THE SAME BROADBAND CARD I USE THROUGH VERIZON TO BROADCAST ON THE ROAD.
The ip addresses posted by princess on twitter show indefinitely that you were in fact at home, not fueling not on location and not on a plane you were sitting at home.
NOW, AS SOME OF YOU MIGHT REMEMBER THERE ARE POSTS ON BEACONHELL TWITTER THAT HAS A TRACER SHOWING THAT SOMEONE WITH THE IP OF MY EMBARQ ACCOUNT WAS ON HER BLOG. CORRECT. WHAT PRINCESS FORGETS IS THAT I HAVE MORE THAN ONE COMPUTER AT HOME WITH THE PC ANYWHERE SOFTWARE ON IT (ACTYUALLY A POORMANS FREEWARE VERSION OF REMOTE ACCESS SOFTWARE , ASK MONO, HE KNOWS ALL ABOUT IT.
THIS SOFTWARE ALLOWS ME TO REMOTELY ACCESS MY HOME PC WHILE USING MY VERIZON CARD AND RUN MY DESKTOP AS IF IT WERE AT THE HOUSE. I WAS TESTING IT ON HER BLOG BECAUSE SHE HAS ME BANNED AND IT IS AN EASY WAY TO SEE IF THE LINK IS WORKING. HAD I USED VERIZON, I WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GET THROUGH.
You were not on a plane with your computer you were at home, in fact i have someone that places you at home during these supposed trips, not just one.. but every single trip you allegedly went on were lies. You were seen at your home.
THIS IS THE ALARMING PART. HOW WOULD SOMEONE KNOW IF I WERE HOME OR NOT?, WHICH BY THE WAY IS NOT TRUE.
THE LOCAL SHERIFF WILL BE INTERESTED SINCE I AM TAKING THIS PRINTOUT ALONG WITH THE TRESPASS WARNING WITH ME TO TAVARES IF I DO NOT GET AN IMMEDIATE EXPLINATION.
PRINCESS MADE THIS POST ON TWITTER THAT STATES
@ChristinaL419 His neighbors said that he never left the hood. hahahaabout 20 hours ago from TweetDeck in reply to ChristinaL419
THIS IS AN ALARMING ADMISSION IF SHE IN FACT CONTACTED ANYONE AROUND MY HOUSE TO DETERMINE MY WHEREABOUTS. THIS STATEMENT, IN FACT, IS A LIE BECAUSE NOBODY SAID ANY SUCH THING.
THIS, ALONG WITH SOME OF HER OTHER CLAIMS IS CLEAR CUT PROOF OF CRIMINAL STALKING. IF I HAD MADE SUCH A COMMENT ABOUT HER SHE WOULD BE CRYING "IRS IRS IRS IRS."
SHE THEN HAS A TWITTER SITE, AMONG SEVERAL WHERE SHE OBSESSES ABOUT ME:
http://twitter.com/Tards_United
IN POST AFTER POST (NOTICE NUMBER TALLY BY USERNAME) SHE PROVES HER STALKING OF ME EVEN USING OLD PHOTOS OF MY PROPERTY OFF GOOGLE EARTH.
THE DEGREE OF HER STALKING REMAINS HIDDEN BEHIND A PASSWORD PROTECT HIGHLY RESTRICED WALL OF SECRECY IN AT LEAST TWO INTERNET LOCATIONS. PROOF OF UNLAWFUL CONDUCT BY HER AND HER MEMBERS ARE DOCUMENTED THERE.
SHE USES THREATS TO PREVENT THE RELEASE OF THAT INFORMATION.
THIS IS THE ACT OF A TRULY DANGEROUS PERSON. ANYONE SHOULD BE WARY OF ANY CONTACT WITH HER.
I DO INTEND TO ASK THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT WHAT TO DO ABOUT THIS AND THE OTHER STATEMENTS.
SINCE I ONLY HAVE A FEW NEIGHBORS, IT SHOULD BE EASY TO CHECK HER CLAIMS OUT.
UPDATE: "ZEN" IMMEDIATELY CAME UP WITH A FAIRY TALE TO HIDE HER MISSTATEMENTS (LIES) BY CLAIMING THAT A PERSON ON ANOTHER BLOG IS A FRIEND WHO LIVES NEAR BY (KNOWS ME) AND WAS VISITING ANOTHER FRIEND (WHO SEEMINGLY MONITORS MY MOVEMENTS 24/7 AND REPORTS BACK TO HER AND BEACONHELL.
NOW IF THAT WERE TRUE, WE WOULD HAVE EVEN MORE CLEAR CUT PROOF OF THEIR CRIMINAL STALKING.
WITHOUT THE ZEN(PRINCESS) FAIRY TALE, THERE IS AMPLE PROOF OF HER STALKING.
You cannot connect to your home connection while fueling up without sitting at your home computer and clicking the button to authorize the remote access so either way you slice it Murt your a liar
THIS SHOWS THE PERSON'S TOTAL LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF INTERNET TECHNOLOGY AND THAT THE TERM "AIRCARD" IS USED BY SOME PEOPLE TO DESCRIBE THE CELLPHONE BASED CARD (IN MY CASE VERISON) TO ACCESS THE INTERNET.
SHE CLAIMS THAT SHE CANNOT OBTAIN MY STREET ADDRESS? PERHAPS NOT THROUGH THE ACCOUNT WITH MY INTERNET PROVIDER, BUT THROUGH SEARCHING MY ACTIVITIES ON THE INTERNET OVER THE YEARS.
IN HER PRIVATE BLOG IS DOCUMENT WHERE SHE ASKED FOR AND RECEIVED CONTACT INFORMATION THAT INCLUDED MY UNLISTED PHONE NUMBERS AND STREET ADDRESS FOR MY RESIDENCE. OLD PICTURES OF THE RESIDENCE NOW ARE PLASTERED ALL OVER THE LINK. THOSE PHOTOGRAPHS AMONG OTHERS ALSO DEMONSTRATE HOW IMAGES CAN BE ALTERED.
HER SKILLS AT ALTERING TEXT MESSAGES FROM MANY DIFFERENT SOURCES ARE ALSO DOCUMENTED WITHIN HER PRIVATE MESSAGE AND ARCHIVE SITES.
ALSODATA MINING WITH THE KNOWLEDGE OF SOMEONE'S IP ADDRESS CAN PROVIDE CLUES FOR SOMEONE PERSISTANT ENOUGH, TO EVENTUALLY FIND WHAT THEY WANT.
DO REMEMBER THAT SHE CLAIMED TO BE ABLE TO TELL I WAS HOME BY THE USE OF MY IP NUMBER?
REGARDING THE STATEMENT ABOUT HAVING TO MANUALY ALLOW ACCESS TO THE HOST COMPUTER:
ANYONE READING THIS BLOG IS ACCESSING A SERVER THAT COULD BE HUNDREDS IF NOT THOUSANDS OF MILES AWAY FROM YOUR HOME. I DOUBT THERE IS SOME GUY IN AN OFFICE SOMEPLACE CHECKING 'OK" AFTER READING YOUR PASSWORD.
THE SOFTWARE I HAVE BEEN PROVIDED WITH IS A FREEWARE REMOTE ACCESS UTILITY THAT ALLOWS SOMEONE TO ACCESS A HOST PC USING A USERNAME AND PASSWORD JUST LIKE ONE USES TO ACCESS A PASSWORD PROTECTED SITE.
IN THIS WAY ONE CAN USE THE HOST COMPUTER AS A PROXY SERVER.
PRINCESS IS QUITE FAMILAR WITH WHAT PROXY SERVERS ARE.
JUST BECAUSE AN ANON SAYS SOMETHING DUMB LIKE THIS, DOES NOT MAKE IT TRUE..
ALL OF YOU REMEMBER WHEN I WARNED YOU ABOUT LOGGING ON ANY OF BEACOHELL OWNED SITE?
NOW YOU KNOW WHY. SHE HAS A HUGE LIBRARY OF INFORMATION ON A LOT OF PEOPLE DUE TO HAVING THEIR IP ADDRESS. USE EXTREME CAUTION VISITING ANY OF HER SITES.
MURT
Publish this comment.
TOOLS
Modus Operandi, MO.
This term came up on my recent "fake trip" where someone was examining my desk top and certain you tube videos.
He said that the "MO" is the same in all the videos and text files that were on my PC and on the different blogs, message and multimedia sites on the internet by people who seem to have issues with me as well as those alleged to have "hacked " ( or whatever the EXACT terms are) my various internet locations.
One example of this was the famous "Thief" video where I seem to be repeating the word "Thief" over and over again. The examiner went on to point out similarities in videos that, at first glance, seem to be made by several different people, were EXACTLY THE SAME when it came to the tone of the content and how the content was created.
Editing methods were similar.
Text Inserts were similar
The WORDING of the text inserts were similar.
The examiner went on to list 10 areas where the files were created or modified by THE SAME PERSON.
When I pointed out that the files were all created and filed by A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT PEOPLE, he scoffed at that statement.
He said "the content that someone creates and puts on the internet is as identifiable as handwriting."
"All you need" he went on to say "Is a known control source of the individual to compare the suspect material against nuch the same way you would use a person's handwriting."
Remember that the soundboard calls were illegal recordings of a telephone calls and also illegal prank phone calls.
This morning when I was writing another article I remembered the "thief" portion of that one call and that of others when I heard this clip that was made after I came back:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CONPZRutHIM
Hmm MODUS OPERANDI, MO, SOUNDBOARD, FALSE REPORTS TO GOVERNMENT AND LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS.....TOOLS=BEACONHELL=PRINCESS?????
YOU HAVE TO WONDER.
MABIE MORE GOING ON HERE THAN JUST STALKING
MURT,
This term came up on my recent "fake trip" where someone was examining my desk top and certain you tube videos.
He said that the "MO" is the same in all the videos and text files that were on my PC and on the different blogs, message and multimedia sites on the internet by people who seem to have issues with me as well as those alleged to have "hacked " ( or whatever the EXACT terms are) my various internet locations.
One example of this was the famous "Thief" video where I seem to be repeating the word "Thief" over and over again. The examiner went on to point out similarities in videos that, at first glance, seem to be made by several different people, were EXACTLY THE SAME when it came to the tone of the content and how the content was created.
Editing methods were similar.
Text Inserts were similar
The WORDING of the text inserts were similar.
The examiner went on to list 10 areas where the files were created or modified by THE SAME PERSON.
When I pointed out that the files were all created and filed by A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT PEOPLE, he scoffed at that statement.
He said "the content that someone creates and puts on the internet is as identifiable as handwriting."
"All you need" he went on to say "Is a known control source of the individual to compare the suspect material against nuch the same way you would use a person's handwriting."
Remember that the soundboard calls were illegal recordings of a telephone calls and also illegal prank phone calls.
This morning when I was writing another article I remembered the "thief" portion of that one call and that of others when I heard this clip that was made after I came back:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CONPZRutHIM
Hmm MODUS OPERANDI, MO, SOUNDBOARD, FALSE REPORTS TO GOVERNMENT AND LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS.....TOOLS=BEACONHELL=PRINCESS?????
YOU HAVE TO WONDER.
MABIE MORE GOING ON HERE THAN JUST STALKING
MURT,
"I KNOW HOW TO GET AROUND A BAN" OR "ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER"
Just a reminder here before we begin. We are talking about a small multimedia chat room with less than20 people in it on average. Not some gigantic multimedia powerhouse with thousands of members.
There are some people who wonder why they get banned from my chat, which is fairly rare.
First, there is the Crybaby Princess, who feels it is her duty to record every single word of every post I have ever made over the last, 5 years, Every hour of my live multimedia webcasts. She then for some odd reason, alters and misrepresents much of the content and then reloads the same all over the internet. This is only a small sample of what this nut does who claims to be taking some kind of college level courses.
How someone finds the time to take a rather involved college course and then have the time to do all of this is beyond me. Hmmm, mabie there is no college course? Who knows? Who cares? I don't.
Then there is the person who says that she cannot understand why I would ban her, even though her actions do not seem to go well with the MAJORITY of the members of the chat?
She brings in people who disrupt the chat, she starts arguments with members and when I ask her to stop she goes right on.
I have had at least a dozen people leave because I let her stay in the room until recently.When I told her she was not welcome and asked her to leave on her own, she refused. Why I wonder? Why would someone demean themselves to the point where they would stay where they are not welcome?
This has me questioning her true motives for being in the chat. It is a small chat where people come to socialize and talk among themselves. They do not need people looking over them and poking fun of them on Twitter, Youtube and who knows where else. They do not need THIS person going over the the paltalk room of THIS person and making a compete fool out of her self.
Now this person brags that she has been on Paltalk for years. I would think if that is the case she understands the TOS of Paltalk and the ETHICS that goes along with being there.
IT IS NOT ETHICAL TO BARGE INTO A CHAT SITE WHERE YOU ARE NOT WANTED BY BYPASSING A BAN.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CONPZRutHIM
FOUR COMPUTERS? I WONDER WHAT ELSE YOU DO WITH THOSE FOUR COMPUTERS?
MURT
There are some people who wonder why they get banned from my chat, which is fairly rare.
First, there is the Crybaby Princess, who feels it is her duty to record every single word of every post I have ever made over the last, 5 years, Every hour of my live multimedia webcasts. She then for some odd reason, alters and misrepresents much of the content and then reloads the same all over the internet. This is only a small sample of what this nut does who claims to be taking some kind of college level courses.
How someone finds the time to take a rather involved college course and then have the time to do all of this is beyond me. Hmmm, mabie there is no college course? Who knows? Who cares? I don't.
Then there is the person who says that she cannot understand why I would ban her, even though her actions do not seem to go well with the MAJORITY of the members of the chat?
She brings in people who disrupt the chat, she starts arguments with members and when I ask her to stop she goes right on.
I have had at least a dozen people leave because I let her stay in the room until recently.When I told her she was not welcome and asked her to leave on her own, she refused. Why I wonder? Why would someone demean themselves to the point where they would stay where they are not welcome?
This has me questioning her true motives for being in the chat. It is a small chat where people come to socialize and talk among themselves. They do not need people looking over them and poking fun of them on Twitter, Youtube and who knows where else. They do not need THIS person going over the the paltalk room of THIS person and making a compete fool out of her self.
Now this person brags that she has been on Paltalk for years. I would think if that is the case she understands the TOS of Paltalk and the ETHICS that goes along with being there.
IT IS NOT ETHICAL TO BARGE INTO A CHAT SITE WHERE YOU ARE NOT WANTED BY BYPASSING A BAN.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CONPZRutHIM
FOUR COMPUTERS? I WONDER WHAT ELSE YOU DO WITH THOSE FOUR COMPUTERS?
MURT
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)