Now for those who still cannot get it through their thick heads, I DO NOT KNOW WHO THIS PERSON IS. I CAN ONLY ASSUME SHE IS FEMALE BASED ON COMMENTS SHE HAS MADE ON HER BLOG AND ON INFORMATION PROVIDED THROUGH E-MAILS BETWEEN US.
As part of their consistent behavior, those out there who criticize me have NO concern or questions about the individual who posted the false report about me and the irresponsible actions of Mommies regarding the calls to The Lake County Florida Sheriff's department.
I am quite certain that those in the room where these recordings originated know full well that Mommies was lying and that NONE of what she has said is true about me. This woman wasted MY taxpayer dollars and diverted law enforcement resources AWAY from their duties with this childish nonsense.
What I will be doing is going over point by point what her actions were on the call and address the claims she makes during these calls.
The first point that has to be made abundantly clear is my reason for making the report in the first place.
Some idiot thought it would be cute to put up a RIPOFFREPORT.COM complaint against me regarding inappropriate contact with a minor. THE COMPLAINT IS A LIE AND THE PERSON WHO MADE THE COMPLAINT KNOWS IT. This was a deliberate SMEAR by this individual. What is more is that this person ADMITTED IN A CHAT ROOM to making the complaint and the reson why. More than one participant in that chat room has informed me who this individual is and why the complaint was made. I understand there is also documentation of this statement that may be provided to me at a later date.
Now that we have this preamble out of the way, let us move on to the recordings.
NOTE: SOON AFTER THESE RECORDINGS WERE UPLOADED, MOMMIESDOLLIES GOT THEM REMOVED FROM YOUTUBE. THE ODD THING IS THAT THESE RECORDINGS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND ARE A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD.
I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN CURIOUS WHY MOMMIESDOLLIES WOULD WANT A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD REMOVED FROM YOUTUBE. OH, COULD IT BE BECAUSE SHE GOT CAUGHT MAKING FALSE REPORTS TO A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY? SOMETHING TO CONSIDER.
Part one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ulu-ntOdoUA
It took less than a minute (00:50) for Mommies to give a false statement to a law enforcement officer (dispatchers are sworn officers of the Lake County Sheriff's office. They are NOT considered civilian employees). Even if the person she was talking to was a civilian, she was talking to a representative of LCSO and giving information to law enforcement that she was citing to be true and correct.
1:20 At this point she was told that the officer who could answer her question would be in the department the next day between 6 a.m. and 6 p.m. This should have ended the conversation, but no.....
3:15 She asks again if it is an investigational report or an informational report. This after being told THE DAY BEFORE that it an INFORMATION REPORT. Had she read my article she would have understood that and WHY I MADE THE REPORT IN THE FIRST PLACE!
Part two:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRq7-z7eA3A&feature=channel
00:15 Question answered. Information report, her name not in it. NOBODY'S NAME in it. States that "he does not know who it is."
00:48 Dispatcher tells why I made the report "he was wronged and wanted to file a report."
1:00 She makes false statement about me in regards to her on the internet. NOBODY has yet to provide a link to back her up.
1:07 She states that I have made threats to contact her family. OH? When how and where?
1:13 She states that I am making threats to other women. Who and what threats?
1:15 Here she makes a SERIOUS charge against me. She is now stating that I claimed to know where a missing child IN AN OPEN CASE is buried (thus stating that I claim he is DEAD, or at one time DID claim) She goes on to state that I wrote a letter to the father of the missing child, Josh Duckett.
Not only is this not true, but she has now inserted her self into AN OPEN MISSING PERSONS CASE AND CAN NOW BE CONSIDERED A MATERIAL WITNESS IN THAT CASE.
I will be informing the Leesburg Florida City Police Department of her claim as soon as I can.
I think that after she purchases a new hearing aid, she may want to listen to the tv segment again and see WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT.
at 1:43 she now states that I have admitted to wanting to hurt little children. SHE DOES NOT STATE THE SOURCE OF THESE ALLEGED ADMISSIONS NOR DOES SHE POINT OUT MY DISPUTING THE PM'S IN QUESTION. She is claiming first hand knowledge by that omission and thus making herself subject to investigation by the SA office.
1:54 Here she engages in statements of a demeaning nature. This does not bode well for her in the civil arena. I NEVER said anything about HER being connected to pornography. I said the person ON THE OTHER SIDE of the conversation in the PM is connected to pornography. Does her statement mean an admission that she is the person on the other side of the PM?
2:10 Another false statement. I have NEVER made any threats against her or her children.
2:47: If you listen close, you will hear the dispatcher catch herself as she starts to giggle when Mommies says she is NOT in Florida but is, in fact in Arizona.
2:53 What is her idea of recently? She states that she RECENTLY moved to Florida. Umm, back in 2008 (this is 2010 remember) that she had been in Arizona for a while. What she was doing was to DELIBERATELY give the dispatcher the FALSE impression that my "stalking" started while she was in FLORIDA. Another false statement on her part.
3:40 At this point she finds out that I filed the report stipulating that the Ripoffreport.com complaint was FALSE. She was told that I WOULD TAKE A POLYGRAPH and that I DID NOT KNOW WHO THE PERSON WAS. All this was in my article btw.
Now at this point, she should have been satisfied with the information, but no......
4:43 AGAIN another false statement. I never said that I included any names on the report.
4:54 NOW she brings her SISTER into this. She keeps upping the ante, trying to get them to pay attention to her rant. We are now almost 5 minutes into a call that is tying up a law enforcement officer that has other duties to attend to.
Now you would think that would end all this but no.......
Part three:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMRNINMJ_YE
During a gap in the recording where Mommies is on hold, the author of the video decided to post some pm's showing what Mommies thinks of those who support me and also of those who are supposed to be her FRIENDS. These are NOT by the way OLD pm's.
According to the author, any spelling errors were in the pm's and copied verbatim.
The content of the video other than the calls are those of the author and not by the person who provided the information to QB.
At 3:32 she makes a statement that is a clear indication that someone is listening to the phone call UNKNOWN to the dispatcher.
3:54 For someone who is concerned and making a SERIOUS call, she sure is giddy. She laughs at this point and makes a comment of some kind.
4:30 She is informed, at this point, she is informed that he is "responding to an alarm." HE IS A COP REMEMBER! Now let us see if she understands this or............
5:00 Nope, she again makes FALSE statements to the dispatcher AFTER BEING TOLD that she needs to talk to the officer that took the report. This call was taken on Jan 23 and there is YET to be anything close to proof of what she is saying.
5:13 Now she claims someone else as part of this big plot. Again, giving false statements to police.
5:20 She states that she has spoken to a lawyer and is doing this in order to consider if she is going to sue. ANY good lawyer would have told her to leave this to HIM and not go around and play DETECTIVE.
Most lawyers will do an initial consultation for free.
5:48 The dispatcher AGAIN tries to end the call by REMINDING her that the officer is ON A CALL and is the ONLY ONE that can answer any specific questions about the report.
5:56 Short term memory loss or what? She asks the same question about the informational report AGAIN!
6:19 She admits she already had the answer.
6:25 Mommies has NEVER told me to "leave her alone." nor has there been any contact between her and I after she was BOOTED off admin and eventually BANNED off my chat. She NEVER said squat about the ripoff report to me.
NOW if she posted to me as ANON, that is NOT MY FAULT. I do NOT track IP'S so I have no way of knowing who ANONS are. She has NEVER identified herself to me in any comment that I am aware of.
7:00 For some odd reason Mommies could NOT comprehend that HE WAS ON A CALL. That means that there is no way of knowing HOW LONG he was going to be in the FIELD (that means away from the building) and she would have to WAIT for him to GET BACK in order to call her.
Part four A: She FINALLY gets Officer Dozier:
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=HereIsMyStuff#p/u/2/VZ0IyNWC00Q
00:15 She has now made a false statement to a sworn officer of the law.
00:35 She now falsely accuses me of making threats to her to a sworn officer of the law.
00:40 She now falsely accuses Kari Sue Bee of making threats against her. Kari is a citizen of a foreign country with defamation laws far stronger than in the us.
00:49 She states again, falsely, that Kari has threatened to call CPS because She does not believe my "lies."
1:00 She has now knowingly charged me with being the accessory after the fact in the murder of a missing child in a STILL OPEN CASE. This is A CRIME! I will be informing the Leesburg City Police department of her conversation with Cpl. Dozier.
To jog everyone's memory, the tv report had to do with the CARETAKER LETTER where I assumed Trenton was still ALIVE!
I have also NEVER had any contact with Josh Duckett and certainly never, ever sent a letter saying that Trenton was dead and I knew where he was buried.
I guess I will have to make an "informational report" to LCPD as well.
1:35: He told her that there was certain information he could not give her and she wondered why? Umm, I seem to remember this discussion regarding Princess and her so called IRS CASE.
1:48 She again LIES to the officer saying that I told her that her name is in the report. NOPE.
1:59 She asks AGAIN after being told again, is this an investigation or a report?
2:40 This part is interesting and upsets her. The deputy informs her that, yes, this is just a report, but THAT I HAVE THE RIGHT TO TAKE THIS TO THE STATE ATTORNEY AND HAVE THEM LOOK INTO IT!
Again, I NEVER TOLD MOMMIES THAT I WAS PRESSING CHARGES AGAINST HER!
3:04 She says "I guess I am lost or ignorant." At least we agree on something.
3:55 This is interesting. She said she called the company (located in AZ by the way) and was waiting for a call back. I wonder if she is going to tell me who filed the complaint on there? Is she going to go in the internet and let eveyone know who the author of the ripoff report is.
IS MOMMIES ABOUT TO THROW ONE OF HER BUDDIES UNDER THE BUS???? I CERTAINLY HOPE SO. OR IS SHE GOING TO GO...."OOPS, I HAD BETTER NOT DO THAT?"
I GUESS WE WILL WAIT AND SEE. REMEMBER THAT THIS CALL WOULD HAVE TAKEN PLACE ON JAN, 22, 2010 ALMOST A MONTH AGO. COME ON MOMMIES, FESS UP!
4:14: I like this statement that she claims that I put the report up there. This is the SAME person who CONSTANTLY corrects my poor grammar and spelling. I would advise people to go and look at that report and notice the grammar, spelling and words that are used.
That is probably why the person who MADE THE REPORT is sighing with relief that she has kept her big trap shut UP TILL NOW.
There is one footnote here. A number of people come forward and stated that the person admitted on the internet to a group that they are the one who made the report and stated WHY. The person also admitted the report was FALSE.
4:35: Is this woman for real? I would suggest that people read what is in there and the resulting posts that came out of it all over the internet. Talking about commiting suicide on the internet!
The poor woman is going to find out that when you make a complaint on Ripoff, you are asked all sorts of PERSONAL information. It is unfortunate that whoever made that report did not understand the reason for them doing that. It might help to understand the business model of the company that owns the website.
5:03 Here we go with this "recently moved from Florida." statement again. Would someone mind telling me what the meaning of RECENT is?
5:15 She makes ANOTHER false statement saying that I again threatened his family and now his sister with BODILY HARM. The first time in the THREE calls THIS TERM came up. Notice that she keeps UPPING THE ANTE to try and get the officer to PAY ATTENTION TO HER.
Note: At least a dozen people VOLUNTARILY gave me their personal information INCLUDING HER. I have EVERY phone call record that shows who I called and WHO CALLED ME. So I can disprove her claims when it becomes necessary.
This also goes for ALL internet e-mails, pm's and so on.
Mommies kept the poor officer tied up for so long it actually exceeded the yotube 10 minute time limit. QB had to split it into two parts.
Part four b:
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=HereIsMyStuff#p/u/1/uxUtKVW3-zQ
0:15: False statements AGAIN
0:37 She is given information that should have dawned on her. She lives in ARIZONA, you go to your LOCAL police FIRST. Sheesh!
Now, in order to get a no contact order against me, she has to show cause. That means she has to sign a statement UNDER OATH that I have done what she has claimed. Now what do you suppose that call that when someone makes a statement UNDER OATH that is NOT TRUE?
PERJURY comes to mind.
Now, I have the right to go before a judge here in FLORIDA and dispute what she claims in the order and file a counter order for her to cease and desist in any statements or claims about me on the internet and that includes posting as ANONYMOUS.
NOW BEAR IN MIND EVERYONE: if she does file such an order I WILL BE UNABLE TO ANSWER ANY ANON POST OR ALLOW ANON COMMENTS SINCE I WOULD HAVE NO WAY TO KNOW IF IT WAS HER.
2:14 She ups the ante AGAIN stating that I am a trucker and that I travel.
Now, ummm isn't this the SAME woman who stated that all my "trips" were FAKE even calling me out in my own chat? Isn't this the SAME woman who claimed that I did NOT even have a JOB?
Odd how she seems not to be able to make up her mind.
2:30 Now she gets to the PM'S of course NOT telling the deputy HOW they got into the hands of the SA in the first place. I did tell CPL Dozier about those PM'S by the way.
3:01 The same question gets asked AGAIN?? Good Grief!
3:30 Just when Cpl Dozier, thinks he can move on.........ONE MORE QUESTION!
3:49: I am not certain why she asked this one.
4:15 She is trying to establish an alibi! Again, she is lying.
She does not remember that certain "individuals" put the link to that report in their TAGLINE next to their USERNAMES. That is how I found out about it.
She certainly made certain of when ripoff put the thing on line. Interesting what she is doing here.
5:37 More than just one more question. DUH, Lake County is in Florida so he would be using FLORIDA time. She does not help her case by calling me names. I think by now Cpl Dozier knows that she is the Lunatic and wishes she would end the damn call!
Also,what she does not understand is that law enforcement will look at a person CLOSER who drones on and on trying to say why they COULD NOT have done what they were accused of rather than accepting the information and ending the call.
7:01 Now the poor officer can go take a leak.
I HAD A BRIEF Q AND A WITH QUEEN BITCH OVER HOW SHE CAME ACROSS THESE CLIPS:
I wanted to be as accurate in my article as I can be so I would like some answers to be able to put in there:
Was her call aired into an audio chat room? (you do not have to name it if you do not want to)
It was aired into a paltalk chat room and she was on open mic, I dont know who's room it was to be honest.
Were the calls broadcast live into the room or were the calls recorded earlier?
I believe two calls were broadcast live into the room, the one to Cpl. Dozier was sent to me. But she aired all calls into the chat room.
Were the calls broadcast live into the room or were the calls recorded earlier?
I believe two calls were broadcast live into the room, the one to Cpl. Dozier was sent to me. But she aired all calls into the chat room.
There is more than one call done over a number of days. I cannot believe that she went into the same chat room LIVE on each call to let the room listen. SOMEONE had to have recorded them and then aired them into the room.
No read above. She aired them LIVE each time
Do you know how many people heard the call?
There were when I was there, about 12 people. About 8 the first time and 12 the second. Like I said the Officer call was sent to me so don't know how many were present for that one.
Was there any discussion of the calls after she was done?
Was there any discussion of the calls after she was done?
Oh Mommies and others talked their heads off how you lied it wasnt a complaint and so forth. I know they were planning on doing something with them but I did not hear that part.
Did ANYONE admit to posting the Ripoff report.?
Did ANYONE admit to posting the Ripoff report.?
No, not while I was there.
Did ANYONE say WHY the ripoff report was made?
Did ANYONE say WHY the ripoff report was made?
No actually a few said it was bogus that someone did that to you.
Was it a trusted member who provided you with these or how did you get them? (this one is up to you to answer or not and how you would want to)
Yes very.
Was it a trusted member who provided you with these or how did you get them? (this one is up to you to answer or not and how you would want to)
Yes very.
THE QUESTIONS AND THEIR RESPONSES WERE PUT UP UNEDITED.
MURT
