REMEMBER THIS? THANKS FOR NOTHING, TINK

Murt Defends Convicted Sex Offender

By princess, on February 27th, 2009

That’s right.  Murt is allowing his moderators to engage in elicit activity while using his paltalk room, and Tinkerbell is defending her sister, CONVICTED sex offender, Windchime (BreezySeas45) aka Terri Cavitalo.  Windchime had been a longtime administrator at Websleuths, until today.  I applaud Tricia for doing the right thing and removing her from the community [...]

WHEN THIS LITTLE GEM CAME OUT BY YOUR "NEW BUDDY" I WENT TO BAT FOR YOU EVEN AFTER THIS ARTICLE WOUND UP ON AT LEAST 30 DIFFERENT BLOGS. I KEPT YOU AS A MOD EVEN AFTER AT LEAST 30 PM'S AND E-MAILS I RECIEVED DEMANDING YOUR IMMEDIATE REMOVAL. YOU WOULD BE SUPRISED AT WHO SOME OF THOSE WERE WHO SENT THE DEMANDS. I GUESS YOU NEED TO FIND OUT THE HARD WAY.


YOUR ACTIONS ARE WHAT I GET IN RETURN. AS I HAVE ALWAYS SAID IN OUR LITTLE MEETING TINK " I DO NOT TRUST ANYONE ON THE INTERNET AND THAT  INCLUDES MY MODS."

I CAN SEE NOW THAT MY LACK OF TRUST IN YOU, AND NANANC WAS JUSTIFIED.

UNLIKE NANA AND THE OTHERS, I WILL NOT BE CONTACTING ANYONE ABOUT YOUR SISTER IN SPITE OF THE THREATS AGAINST ME.

HAVE FUN DESTROYING ME WITH YOUR NEW FOUND "FRIEND" AND WHILE YOU ARE  AT IT ASK HER THIS QUESTION.


 WHY IS THAT ARTICLE STILL ON BEACONHELL.COM IN PUBLIC? YOU "YOU PALED UP WITH HER IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT SHE DID NOT TAKE THIS ARTICLE DOWN?


AN ARTICLE THAT IS STILL IN THE PUBLIC AREA ABLE TO BE FOUND  BY ENTERING  THE SINGLE WORD "WINDCHIME" WITH THE SAME PUBLIC RECORDS THAT WERE PUT UP BEFORE?


IS THAT WHAT YOU REALLY THINK OF YOUR SISTER?


THIS IS THE PART I DO NOT GET. YOU RAIL AGAINST ME AND MY BRIEF ARTICLE THAT WAS MEANT TO PROVE TO YOU WHO THE TRUE PROBLEM WAS. I DID NOT WRITE THAT ARTICLE, I ONLY LINKED IT AND ADDED A COMMENT.


THIS BLOG IS READ BY LESS THAN A DOZEN PEOPLE YET THE ARTICLE ON WINDCHIME IS ON SEVERAL MUCH LARGER BLOGS.


REMEMBER THAT AND ALL THE THINGS I DID WHEN I CAME TO YOUR DEFENSE. I WILL AND WILL REMEMBER NOT TO MAKE THAT MISTAKE WITH ANYONE ELSE EVER AGAIN.


MURT

F

"NOTHING TO DO WITH CAYLEE" OH REALLY?

There was a bit of a pissing match going on between bloggers lately about the use of a teddy bear that has become well known over the past year or so. The target of the article where the image was used, expressed her outrage that the bear was used in that context considering the outrage that came about when the product the image depicted was offered for sale to the general public.

There were calls for boycotts, prosecutions, petitions and even Nancy Grace got in on the act.

The reaction to the bloggers outrage by another blogger? "The bear had nothing to do with Caylee."

Oh really?  Explain this one:
http://community2.myfoxorlando.com/_More-Caylee-Scams-Caylee-Bears-Bags/BLOG/300008/72667.html


MURT

SOMEONE DID SOME FIBBING

I was asked by someone in an e-mail recently if I had any kind of IP trace on this blog and I said no. As far as I have been able to determine the owner of a blog on Blogger.com does NOT have the capability to see the ip address or any other identifier information of ANYONE who posts here.

My WORDPRESS blog, on the other hand DOES ALLOW FOR ME TO SEE IP ADDRESSES. This is why the "hater" comments all but stopped on my Wordpress  blog and suddenly flooded this one when it reopened.

I plan on reopening my Wordpress blog eventually and will be curious to see if the "brave anons" migrate over there with ip information that does NOT derive from anon servers and other places that hide their ip information.

If the nitwit who wrote that claim in her article about THIS blog can show me how to bring up ip addresses HERE, I would love to see her PROOF.

MURT

THE NKVD INCIDENT

Some dingbat seems to relish in bring up a problem I had some years back with this virus. I would suggest that people who read THAT blog start reading some of the links regarding this nasty piece of work.

http://www.computing.net/answers/security/nkvdus-homepage-hijack/17708.html
The above link is one of THOUSANDS that went up when this thing spread like wildfire. I first encountered this thing while sitting in a rest area in North Carolina. I was trying to complete some transactions when I found that I could not get into some websites that I used for this purpose. A short time later, it was determined that the NKVD homepage hijacker was the culprit.

As it is described in the article I ATTEMPTED to form a group to do something about this little problem. There were people INTERNATIONALLY where were angry about what had been done and believe me, had any of THEM caught up to the culprit, the results would have been dire indeed.

With a little digging, it was found that this item was created by a twerp in Canada who used the virus to MAKE MONEY. The web page high jacker would direct people to his cliant's websites.

When my efforts to form a group FAILED as people tended to want to do things on their own, I gave up on the group concept and moved on. From what I understand the virus was soon eradicated and the perp "delt with" by fellow Canadians who had an issue with his so called business model.

The anti-virus community has also managed to catch up to malware of this nature so such advocacy is not as necessary as it used to be. This incident was well over 4 years ago and I am certain, public as my posts were, that if there were any legal problems stemming from them, they would have been dealt with long before now.

MURT

MURt