FOR SOME STRANGE REASON MICHELLE MCKEE DECIDED TO STALK THE FACEBOOK PAGE OF DIANNE HOLDEN AND PUT IT INTO A SPECIAL FILE. OUT OF THE TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FACEBOOK PAGES ON THE INTERNET, SHE CHOOSES THIS ONE, WHY?
TWO REASONS, FIRST SHE IS AN AUTHOR THAT MICHELLE DOES NOT LIKE AND WE HAVE ALL SEEN THE TIRADES SHE DOES AGAINST AUTHORS SHE DOES NOT LIKE.
SECOND REASON IS THAT DIANA HOLDEN CONTACTED ME WHEN SHE LEARNED OF THE STALKING OF ME BY MICHELLE MCKEE AND INFORMED ME SHE, ALONG WITH PAT BROWN, DIANNE FANNING, K. CASEY AND SCORES OF OTHERS ARE ALSO BEING STALKED AND HARASSED IN THE SAME MANNER BY MICHELLE MCKEE.
NOW I ALSO SEEM TO REMEMBER WHEN MICHELLE MCKEE WENT OFF ON A TIRADE ABOUT BRINGING CHILDREN INTO THE DEBATES WE SEEM TO BE ENGAGED IN.
SO WHAT DOES MICHELLE MCKEE DO? SHE BRINGS A DISPUTE INVOLVING DIANNA'S CHILDREN INTO THE DEBATE.
SO MUCH FOR NOT BRINGING CHILDREN INTO ALL OF THIS. I AM REALLY BEGINNING TO THINK THAT MICHELLE MCKEE IS BEHIND ALL OF THE DRAMA AT SBD'S SITE INVOLVING THE MENTION OF HIS SON AND SOME OF THE OTHER NONSENSE OVER THERE. SHE MAY HAVE DONE THIS TO STIR UP THE DRAMA AND BLAME THE OTHERS FOR THE MENTIONS IN ORDER TO DEFAME THEM. I HAVE HEARD THAT MICHELLE IS KNOWN FOR THIS SORT OF THING.
HER ACTIONS SPEAK. WHY ELSE BRING INNOCENT CHILDREN INTO THE DEBATE.
ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HER ACTIONS ALONG THIS LINE IS AGAIN TO ATTACK ME USING MY DEAD WIFE (WITHIN LESS THAN A MONTH OF WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN OUR 38TH WEDDING ANNIVERSARY. NICE GOING, AS WELL AS MY DEAD SON. BRINGING UP A FATHER'S DEAD SON SEEMS TO BE EASY FOR MICHELLE, HMM?
I GUESS THE RULES ONLY APPLY TO MICHELLE MCKEE AND NOBODY ELSE....HOW SELFISH.
MURT
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
FIBBER MCKEE'S FAIRY TALES
It seems that Ms. McKee has found a group of lemmings that do not have a clue as to how things work in the real world.
First, let us tackle the stalking fiction. Ms. McKee is ranting and raving about everyone wanting to know where she lives and who her followers on twitter are.
Besides the obvious question of WHO CARES? one also has to ask why go through the convoluted and complicated processes she claims all of her enemies (and there are many) have gone through to get her "personal information."
First, she claims that Pat Brown got all of her personal information and in turn gave it to me.
Then she claims that I gave Pat Brown her personal information.
Then she claims that Anne R got her "dead relatives" information off Nexis Lexis." which, by far, has to be the silliest claim of this loon.
Ms. McKee clearly demonstrates that she was crappy at whatever job she held at NICB based on her rants.
To start off, let us look at just what LexisNexis is.
They are two DIFFERENT database services owned by the same company.
http://law.lexisnexis.com/
Lexis: This is the legal division. As noted on their webpage YOU DO NOT HAVE TO BE A LAW FIRM TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS SERVICE.
The only criteria you need is a fat wallet to pay for the service. It is not FREE
Lexis concentrates on the database and software services dealing with LEGAL matters and information.
Nexis is more of a general information database. In the old days this used to be a database of published articles found in various media sources.
http://www.lexisnexis.com/about-us/
These services combined to form NexisLexis. If you go to either domain, you are directed to the combined website.
There is nothing super secret or confidential in any of these databases. The information is readily available through free or much less expensive sources if you know the questions to ask and where to look.
The rant over someone using a "legal firms" access is silly at best. Nothing prosecutable occured (if it did at all, not likely) other than unauthorized access through the use of log in information carelessly left behind by someone.
If everyone was prosecuted for "borrowing" their employers internet access, the prisons would be overstuffed and there would be nobody around to read the blogs.
Next we deal with the twitter fiasco. Why the hell would I be interested in reading that nitwits twitter rants or wanting her followers?
Most of her rants deal with Pat Brown or some other victim or, in most cases, her day to day activities regarding In Cold Blog.
Any information on that twitter account is useless. The same goes for her followers. No reason to follow them. Just another illogical rant by the Fibber Queen.
Last but not least comes this bs about her residence in Gig Harbor.
This one is short and sweet. Why go through all the complicated bother of going through Twitter searches of cross streets and so on when all one has to do is "let their fingers do the walking."
The lemmings that follow her certainly are dumb.
MURT
First, let us tackle the stalking fiction. Ms. McKee is ranting and raving about everyone wanting to know where she lives and who her followers on twitter are.
Besides the obvious question of WHO CARES? one also has to ask why go through the convoluted and complicated processes she claims all of her enemies (and there are many) have gone through to get her "personal information."
First, she claims that Pat Brown got all of her personal information and in turn gave it to me.
Then she claims that I gave Pat Brown her personal information.
Then she claims that Anne R got her "dead relatives" information off Nexis Lexis." which, by far, has to be the silliest claim of this loon.
Ms. McKee clearly demonstrates that she was crappy at whatever job she held at NICB based on her rants.
To start off, let us look at just what LexisNexis is.
They are two DIFFERENT database services owned by the same company.
http://law.lexisnexis.com/
Lexis: This is the legal division. As noted on their webpage YOU DO NOT HAVE TO BE A LAW FIRM TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS SERVICE.
The only criteria you need is a fat wallet to pay for the service. It is not FREE
Lexis concentrates on the database and software services dealing with LEGAL matters and information.
Nexis is more of a general information database. In the old days this used to be a database of published articles found in various media sources.
http://www.lexisnexis.com/about-us/
These services combined to form NexisLexis. If you go to either domain, you are directed to the combined website.
There is nothing super secret or confidential in any of these databases. The information is readily available through free or much less expensive sources if you know the questions to ask and where to look.
The rant over someone using a "legal firms" access is silly at best. Nothing prosecutable occured (if it did at all, not likely) other than unauthorized access through the use of log in information carelessly left behind by someone.
If everyone was prosecuted for "borrowing" their employers internet access, the prisons would be overstuffed and there would be nobody around to read the blogs.
Next we deal with the twitter fiasco. Why the hell would I be interested in reading that nitwits twitter rants or wanting her followers?
Most of her rants deal with Pat Brown or some other victim or, in most cases, her day to day activities regarding In Cold Blog.
Any information on that twitter account is useless. The same goes for her followers. No reason to follow them. Just another illogical rant by the Fibber Queen.
Last but not least comes this bs about her residence in Gig Harbor.
This one is short and sweet. Why go through all the complicated bother of going through Twitter searches of cross streets and so on when all one has to do is "let their fingers do the walking."
The lemmings that follow her certainly are dumb.
MURT
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)