Saturday, April 11, 2009

WHOOPS

The following poster made the same exact mistake she made almost 3 years ago:

MURT IS A f**kING LIAR!

1. Yes, Murt - you did indeed tell the family of Trenton Duckett that you knew where he was, and that he was to be rescued shortly by a law enforcement raid on a residence one mile west of Loves Creations. Remember that? WE DO!


WHO IS WE? I NEVER SAID ANY SUCH THING. AGAIN THIS WAS A HIGH PROFILE MISSING CHILD CASE WITHIN THE SAME COUNTY I LIVED IN AND THE PERSON I HAD TELEPHONIC CONTACT WITH IS THE WIFE OF A RETIRED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. A LITTLE COMMON SENSE HERE, FOLKS.

2. Yes, Murt - you did indeed tell another member of TT that you were a US Marshall. Remember that? WE DO.

UH, RIGHT, AGAIN, NATIONAL CASE AND AFTER 911.

3. Speaking of being followed. Murt, you stated a couple of years ago that YOU were being satalked by a lady in a black SUV. You said that the “surveillance camera” that you had trained on your property had recorded this lady driving a black SUV in front of your house.

What’s interesting about this is the lady you were referring to DID NOT drive the black SUV anywhere near your property, because even though a vehicle of that description was registered in her name, it was not the vehicle that she drove - but the vehicle another member of her family drove on a regular basis.

You f**ked up with that one, Murt. Because at that point WE knew that you had run her name - illegally I might add - through you dealer database.

THIS IS WHERE THESE PEOPLE MESSED UP. I NEVER IDENTIFIED BY NAME WHO THE DRIVER WAS. I SIMPLY SAID A WOMAN DRIVING A BLACK SUV.

IT WAS THEY WHO CAME BACK AND SAID THAT "SHE" DOES NOT DRIVE A BLACK SUV.

ANOTHER POINT HERE. I AM ACCUSED OF CHECKING THE INDIVIDUAL'S TAG USING MY DEALERSHIP. THIS DID NOT HAPPEN FOR TWO REASONS:

FIRST: FLORIDA HAS A SYSTEM CALLED TAG TALK. IF I MAKE A TAG OR VIN CHECK USING THIS SYSTEM, IT IS RECORDED SINCE I HAVE TO PAY A FEE FOR THE SERVICE AND IT IS THE LAW. IF I CHECKED THAT TAG THERE WOULD BE A RECORD OF IT, THERE IS NOT.

SECOND: IN ORDER TO CHECK THE TAG, I WOULD HAVE TO HAVE THE TAG NUMBER. SINCE I DO NOT, TO THIS DAY,KNOW WHERE THE PERSON IN QUESTION LIVES, I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO CHECK THAT TAG UNLESS THE VEHICLE HAD BEEN AT MY RESIDENCE.

YOU f**k!

WE will NEVER stop watching you, you f**k. We will watch you, we will do everything we can keep you from exploiting the children and families you prey on.

(Oh, and to add: we KNOW you never had surveillance, dumbass. We checked. Carefully, and with much amusement. Maybe I’ll post a pic.)

OH REALLY?

TWO POINTS HERE. YOU JUST DENIED THAT I WAS NOT BEING FOLLOWED OR SPIED UPON. IN ORDER TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION YOU WOULD HAVE TO HAVE BEEN ON MY PROPERTY. THAT IS CALLED BURGLERY AND STALKING.

YOU SOUND LIKE THE SAME WOMAN WHO HAD HER PHOTO TAKEN PEEKING THROUGH THE WINDOW OF THE BEDROOM OF A MISSING CHILD.

THE CAMERA THAT CAUGHT THE SUV WAS HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT. TO BAD YOU MISSED IT.