I SEE THERE IS YET ANOTHER ARTICLE AT THAT SMEAR BLOG THAT SEEMS NOT TO WANT TO DISCUSS THE PERSON ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PM'S BUT RATHER KEEP THE NONSENSE CONCERNING THEIR LITTLE PRANK GOING.
AT THE SAME TIME THE GROUP KEEPS MISREPRESENTING THE FACTS.
NOW THE PERSON BRINGS UP THE USTREAM INCIDENT.
NOW EITHER THAT PERSON IS SUFFERING A POOR MEMORY OR IS BEING DELIBERATELY DECEPTIVE. I WOULD SAY IT IS THE LATTER.
FOR THOSE WHO WERE THERE (AS THE PERSON WAS WHO SENT ME THE ARTICLE) WOULD REMEMBER, THERE WERE TWO "SUICIDE" INCIDENTS.
THE FIRST ONE, THAT CAUSED ALL THE FUSS TOOK PLACE WELL BEFORE THE ONE THAT WAS ORIGINATED BY THE GROUP, AND YES I SAID GROUP, THAT CREATED THE FAKE PM'S.
YES, THE FAKE PM'S WERE CREATED WHILE I WAS OFF THE COMPUTER AS THOSE WHO READ THEM REMINDED ME THAT THERE WAS A PERIOD OF TIME I WAS EITHER SLEEPING OR OFF THE COMPUTER. THE REASON FOR THAT STATEMENT IS THAT THE LOG ON RECORD FOR MY ACCOUNT SHOWS ME ON PALTALK WHEN I WAS, IN FACT, NOT.
THE AUTHOR OF THAT BLOG SHOULD KNOW THAT BECAUSE SHE WAS AN ADMIN AT THE TIME.
THE AUTHOR ALSO SCREWED UP. SHE CLAIMS THAT I WAS ON USTREAM WHEN THE SUICIDE INCIDENT REGARDING THE PM'S TOOK PLACE.
THERE IS A SLIGHT PROBLEM HERE. IF I WAS ON USTREAM HOW DID I GO INTO A SESSION ON PALTALK TO ENGAGE IN THIS CONVERSATION?
I CHANGED OVER TO PALTALK ENTIRELY LEAVING THE SERVER THAT HOSTED BOTH THE CHAT AND THE STREAM FROM USTREAM.
SINCE THE MODERATORS AT THE SERVER DID NOT WANT TO DO A STREAM FROM BOTH PALTALK AND USTREAM, I NO LONGER USED USTREAM FROM THAT POINT ON.
THE LAST TIME I USED USTREAM WAS DURING THE SEARCH AT JAY BLANCHARD PARK. BY THE TIME CAYLEE WAS RECOVERED, I WAS ON PALTALK.
THE PM SESSION THAT THIS GROUP OF LIARS KEEP TOUTING WERE MADE UP OF AT LEAST 14 SESSIONS THAT TOOK LACE OVER A TWO WEEK PERIOD STARTING IN MID DECEMBER.
THE CALL TO THE LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE (READ THE POLICE REPORT) WAS MADE JUST BEFORE CHRISTMAS OF 2008.
NOW TO GET THIS CLEAR FOR THE THICK HEADED IDIOT WHO KEEPS BEATING THE DEAD HORSE OVER THESE STUPID PM'S HERE ARE SOME BULLET POINTS.
1: THE POINT I WAS MAKING IN THE QUOTE YOU CITED WAS THAT THE PERSON WHO CREATED THE FAKE PM'S MAY HAVE LOGGED INTO MY ACCOUNT WHILE I WAS NOT ON MY COMPUTER AND SLEEPING IN ORDER TO CREATE A FAKE SESSION IN ORDER TO GET THE TEMPLATE OF MY CHAT WINDOW. IT IS THEN A SIMPLE MATTER OF USING SOMETHING LIKE PHOTOSHOP OR PAINT SHOP PRO TO CREATE A CONVERSATION THAT SIMPLY DID NOT TAKE PLACE.
NOW, IN ORDER TO PULL OFF THIS LITTLE STUNT, THE PERSON WOULD HAVE TO HAVE BOTH MY ROOM PASSWORD AS WELL AS MY MAIN ACCOUNT PASSWORD. ALL ONE HAS TO DO IS FIGURE OUT WHO I ALLOWED TO HAVE THIS INFORMATION AND YOU HAVE THE MAIN SUSPECT FOR ALLOWING THIS DECEPTION TO OCCUR.
THE PERSON FORGOT A LITTLE SOMETHING. WHEN A PERSON IS LOGGED INTO PALTALK AND SOMEONE ELSE TRIES TO LOG IN USING THE SAME NAME AND ACCOUNT INFORMATION, THE PERSON WHO LOGGED ON FIRST WILL BE BUMPED OFF. A MESSAGE WILL APPEAR TO THE BUMPED OFF PERSON SAYING THAT THEY WERE DISCONNECTED BECAUSE SOMEONE LOGGED IN FROM ANOTHER COMPUTER.
THIS WAS AN ONGOING PROBLEM I HAD UNTIL I CHANGED THE MAIN ACCOUNT PASSWORD.
IT WAS RIGHT AFTER I MADE THE CHANGE THAT I STARTED TO NOTICE PROBLEMS WITH A NUMBER OF MY MODERATORS.
2:I DID TAKE THE 14 PLUS PM CONVERSATIONS OVER TO MY LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY WITHIN HOURS OF THE CALL WHERE THE FEMALE PRETENDED TO BE MY DAUGHTER AND LEFT THE TIME AND TEMP NUMBER FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA AS A CALL BACK NUMBER.
3: I DID NOT LEARN OF THE TAMPERED PM'S UNTIL AFTER I HAD BEEN TO THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE. THAT IS HOW THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE DETERMINED THAT THE PM'S WERE A HOAX. THEY COULD EASILY TELL THAT MY VERSIONS WERE CORRECT AND THE ONES THE AUTHOR KEEPS TOUTING WERE FAKE. WHEN I MADE THE STATEMENTS ABOUT WHAT I WROTE IN THE PM'S, I WAS CITING THE UNALTERED PM'S AND NOT THE ONES PUBLISHED.
IT WAS QUITE A WHILE BEFORE I READ THE ALTERED PM'S. I FELT NO REASON TO READ THEM BECAUSE I ASSUMED THAT SOMEONE HAD RELEASED THE UNALTERED ONES. A MISTAKE ON MY PART. I HAD NO IDEA THE DEGREE OF DECEPTION BY THESE PEOPLE THAT HAD TAKEN PLACE.
4: THE CONTINUED REFUSAL BY THE AUTHOR TO NOT DISCUSS WHO WAS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE CONVERSATION PROVES SOMETHING IS AMISS. COULD IT BE THE FACT THAT THE PERSON INVOLVED IS A CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER AND THAT HIS CRIMES ARE THOSE OF VILE AND LEWD ACTS ON A CHILD? LEWD ACTS SO BAD THAT HE IS CONFINED TO HIS RESIDENCE AND HAS NO BUSINESS EVEN BEING ON A COMPUTER?
5:THERE IS NO CRIME COMMITTED BY ME IN REGARDS TO THOSE PM'S IN EITHER THE ALTERED OR UNALTERED VERSIONS OF THE PM'S. THE LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TOLD ME THAT THEY ARE USELESS AS AN INVESTIGATIVE TOOL.
FIRST BECAUSE NO LAW WAS BROKEN AND SECOND, BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO IDEA (AT THE TIME I DISCUSSED THIS WITH THEM IN 2008) WHO THE PERSON IS OR THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE CREATION OF THIS MATERIAL.
6:THIS WAS A PRIVATE CONVERSATION (REMEMBER THAT AS A RULE PM'S ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE PUBLISHED. IT IS A BREECH OF ETHICS TO DO SO.) NOT MEANT TO BE SEEN BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC.
THE LCSO IS QUITE FAMILAR WITH IM'S AND PM'S AND THEY REALIZE THAT I HAVE BEEN ON LINE FOR QUITE SOME TIME. LOGIC DICTATES THAT I WOULD NOT ADMIT OR SAY SUCH THINGS TO A PERSON I DO NOT KNOW SINCE IT MIGHT WIND UP ON THE INTERNET.
7:THE PERSON WHO WRITES IN THAT BLOG, OR AT LEAST ONE OF THEM HAS GIVEN FALSE INFORMATION TO THE LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE IN THE PROCESS OF CALLING THEM TO SEE IF SHE WAS BEING INVESTIGATED FOR CREATING THE RIPOFF REPORT. SINCE SHE REFUSES TO COME CLEAN ON WHY SHE LIED TO THE COPS, WHY SHOULD WE BELIEVE ANYTHING SHE WROTE IN THAT BLOG.
8:THE FACT THAT THE CREATOR(S) OF THAT BLOG MISREPRESENT IT BY USING LINKS AND USERNAMES IN A DECEPTIVE MANNER NEGATE ANY VALIDITY OF THEIR WRITINGS .
9:HONEST PEOPLE DO NOT IMPERSONATE OR TRICK READERS TO THEIR SITES BY USING LINK TERMS MEANT TO DIRECT THEM TO A LEGITIMATE WEBSITE. IF THEY ARE GOING TO LIE ABOUT WHO THEY ARE, LOGIC DICTATES THAT THE CONTENTS OF THEIR BLOG ARE LIES AS WELL.
MURT
