DUE TO RECENT EVENTS, I HAVE REOPENED THE BLOG AT THIS LOCATION.IT WILL REMAIN OPEN HERE INDEFINATELY.
MURT
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
A HELL OF A WAY TO START A NEW MILLENNIUM
We are now approaching the end of the 10th year of the second thousand years after the center point the world has established for the measure of the passage of time.
This decade started things off with a bang. The 911 attacks came right at the beginning with the effects of that date with us to this day. Some of our loved ones are no longer with us as a result and others are serving overseas and elsewhere in ways that none of us had dreamed of on that first day of this new decade and new millennium.
In the midst of this is the loss of the children who will not grow up and move into the next decade with the rest of us. Those missing and lost children will miss out on the wonders that lie ahead. We can all only hope that in the next decade and those that follow, changes and circumstances will occur to reduce the number of missing and exploited children among us. We can also hope that in the next decade, some of the lost will be found.
We can close out this decade, with at least THAT hope.
MURT
This decade started things off with a bang. The 911 attacks came right at the beginning with the effects of that date with us to this day. Some of our loved ones are no longer with us as a result and others are serving overseas and elsewhere in ways that none of us had dreamed of on that first day of this new decade and new millennium.
In the midst of this is the loss of the children who will not grow up and move into the next decade with the rest of us. Those missing and lost children will miss out on the wonders that lie ahead. We can all only hope that in the next decade and those that follow, changes and circumstances will occur to reduce the number of missing and exploited children among us. We can also hope that in the next decade, some of the lost will be found.
We can close out this decade, with at least THAT hope.
MURT
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
PEDOPHILE
TO PEDOPHILE:
Your comments of late have been most interesting and informative. I cannot, however, post your comments due to the private content. While that content goes a long way to explain things, It is not my policy to publish such information.
You may publish your information elsewhere, if you wish. Somehow I think you wanted that information here, but no dice.
You may continue sending my your comments as you seem intent on doing. My decision remains, however, the same. Your comments will not be posted.
MURT
Your comments of late have been most interesting and informative. I cannot, however, post your comments due to the private content. While that content goes a long way to explain things, It is not my policy to publish such information.
You may publish your information elsewhere, if you wish. Somehow I think you wanted that information here, but no dice.
You may continue sending my your comments as you seem intent on doing. My decision remains, however, the same. Your comments will not be posted.
MURT
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
UH, CAPTAIN, GO FISH
This new venture this "Captain" is purported to be starting is getting more elaborate with every comment I get. This new "broadcast source" started out as someone having a pre-subscription list of around 500 members who are content to sit around for MONTHS while this new fangeled THING gets off the ground.
For a while I was convinced that someone was taking advantage of what is out there and getting into mobile new media coverage in much the same manner I did.
Unfortunately like all fish tales, this one seems to be growing from a bait fish to a full blown beluga whale.
IT is time to come to your senses here. It is one thing for a one person one lap top operation to duplicate what I do to having a fleet of fairly new (based on the beat up van wise crack) roaming around the country covering a number of these cases.
I am going to go into just a few of the expenses and problems this new Captain will encounter.
First whatever platform is going to be used, car, van, truck, the procurement and operational costs alone are going to be astronomical, It costs an average of 30 cents per mile EACH to run an average vehicle needed for this purpose, and that is at the cheap end. IF this is going to be a SUSTAINED broadcast, a USED vehicle is out of the question. It is then a NEW vehicle for purchase or LEASE comes into play. You now have a rocket of expenses ready for lift off.
That does NOT include, by the way, the cost of BUYING the thing. Even a used vehicle is not cheap. You need something new enough to stand up to the wear and tear of running around covering these stories. The mileage on the odomoter will pile up FAST, believe me.
Next is insurance. ANY insurance carrier is going to consider this a COMMERCIAL venture. This is NOT private use. Even if it is a non -profit, the term applies. The premiums will be at least DOUBLE the normal driver's insurance. Due to what the insurance carriers call EXPOSURE, they would recommend the kind of coverage I have which raises the premium even more.GOD FORBID THE DRIVERS OF THESE THINGS ARE UNDER25 AND MALE!
Then, guess what? There is the cost of getting the signal on the internet. I accomplished this using Verizon usb modems (I mistakenly called these things aircards) at around $60.00 a piece per month. With that you get around 5-10 hours of continuous airtime before the added charges kick in. I ran up a 700.00 bill after only 3 days at Blanchard and nearly shut down because of it. I was able to negotiate an additional 5gb of airtime with Verizon keeping my total expenses for the service at 125.00 or so.
This still,only gained me another 5-10 hours or so of airtime. Multimedia broadcasts of this nature eats up a lot of bandwidth. Bandwidth costs money, LOTS of it.
This is why the commercial networks use Satellite trucks. They are on the air 24/7 and it is cost effective to them. It also results in BETTER audio/video quality. Most often the signals are split at the studio for feeds over the internet. Most media outlets do NOT have someone sit and transmit ONLY from the internet. It is called cross utilization of assets.
Add to this the fact that the NETWORKS and LARGE MARKET outlets are jumping on the bandwagon. Most new sat trucks are now being retrofitted to do over the air t1 transmissions over the intenet.
CNN has been doing this for years, starting with the Iraq war coverage and they are expanding daily.
There is also the cost of such things as cameras, microphones, the computer, fees and permits (parking) and other minor expenses.
Oh, there are the OTHER minor expenses such as eating and finding a place to sleep, or do the operators of these vehicles plan on sleeping in them and providing their own food. I can only guess that all of these drivers and such are volunteers. I would hate to have to go into the labor laws and expenses. By the way, some states and even the federal government may require WORKMAN'S COMP and other INSURANCE as it relates to operate a fleet.
So, if this fish quits growing and this venture is for real, I am looking forward to see how it is carried out. By the looks of it the Captain may want to stock up on some strong headache medicine. HE/she is going to need LOTS of it.
Stay Tuned.
It looks like 2010 is shaping up to be an interesting year.
MURT
For a while I was convinced that someone was taking advantage of what is out there and getting into mobile new media coverage in much the same manner I did.
Unfortunately like all fish tales, this one seems to be growing from a bait fish to a full blown beluga whale.
IT is time to come to your senses here. It is one thing for a one person one lap top operation to duplicate what I do to having a fleet of fairly new (based on the beat up van wise crack) roaming around the country covering a number of these cases.
I am going to go into just a few of the expenses and problems this new Captain will encounter.
First whatever platform is going to be used, car, van, truck, the procurement and operational costs alone are going to be astronomical, It costs an average of 30 cents per mile EACH to run an average vehicle needed for this purpose, and that is at the cheap end. IF this is going to be a SUSTAINED broadcast, a USED vehicle is out of the question. It is then a NEW vehicle for purchase or LEASE comes into play. You now have a rocket of expenses ready for lift off.
That does NOT include, by the way, the cost of BUYING the thing. Even a used vehicle is not cheap. You need something new enough to stand up to the wear and tear of running around covering these stories. The mileage on the odomoter will pile up FAST, believe me.
Next is insurance. ANY insurance carrier is going to consider this a COMMERCIAL venture. This is NOT private use. Even if it is a non -profit, the term applies. The premiums will be at least DOUBLE the normal driver's insurance. Due to what the insurance carriers call EXPOSURE, they would recommend the kind of coverage I have which raises the premium even more.GOD FORBID THE DRIVERS OF THESE THINGS ARE UNDER25 AND MALE!
Then, guess what? There is the cost of getting the signal on the internet. I accomplished this using Verizon usb modems (I mistakenly called these things aircards) at around $60.00 a piece per month. With that you get around 5-10 hours of continuous airtime before the added charges kick in. I ran up a 700.00 bill after only 3 days at Blanchard and nearly shut down because of it. I was able to negotiate an additional 5gb of airtime with Verizon keeping my total expenses for the service at 125.00 or so.
This still,only gained me another 5-10 hours or so of airtime. Multimedia broadcasts of this nature eats up a lot of bandwidth. Bandwidth costs money, LOTS of it.
This is why the commercial networks use Satellite trucks. They are on the air 24/7 and it is cost effective to them. It also results in BETTER audio/video quality. Most often the signals are split at the studio for feeds over the internet. Most media outlets do NOT have someone sit and transmit ONLY from the internet. It is called cross utilization of assets.
Add to this the fact that the NETWORKS and LARGE MARKET outlets are jumping on the bandwagon. Most new sat trucks are now being retrofitted to do over the air t1 transmissions over the intenet.
CNN has been doing this for years, starting with the Iraq war coverage and they are expanding daily.
There is also the cost of such things as cameras, microphones, the computer, fees and permits (parking) and other minor expenses.
Oh, there are the OTHER minor expenses such as eating and finding a place to sleep, or do the operators of these vehicles plan on sleeping in them and providing their own food. I can only guess that all of these drivers and such are volunteers. I would hate to have to go into the labor laws and expenses. By the way, some states and even the federal government may require WORKMAN'S COMP and other INSURANCE as it relates to operate a fleet.
So, if this fish quits growing and this venture is for real, I am looking forward to see how it is carried out. By the looks of it the Captain may want to stock up on some strong headache medicine. HE/she is going to need LOTS of it.
Stay Tuned.
It looks like 2010 is shaping up to be an interesting year.
MURT
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
THE NEW SHERIFF IN TOWN
There has been some comments lately about a new "captain" of the new media broadcasting trend that is taking place. This new blog promises an innovative way of covering True Crime Cases.
Some of the comments seem bent on making me feel jealous or angry at the new "competition."
Sorry, but that will not work. I welcome ANYONE who can broadcast any trial live and cover the current cases well enough to attract a following up to the 500 level that I have been told. The MORE people who hop on board this new media bandwagon the better.
The MORE news about the missing means MORE eyes out there looking FOR the missing.
REMEMBER that this is about the MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN..........AND ADULTS and NOT about ME OR ANY INDIVIDUAL BLOGGER OR GROUP.
Bear that in mind and good luck.
MURT
Some of the comments seem bent on making me feel jealous or angry at the new "competition."
Sorry, but that will not work. I welcome ANYONE who can broadcast any trial live and cover the current cases well enough to attract a following up to the 500 level that I have been told. The MORE people who hop on board this new media bandwagon the better.
The MORE news about the missing means MORE eyes out there looking FOR the missing.
REMEMBER that this is about the MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN..........AND ADULTS and NOT about ME OR ANY INDIVIDUAL BLOGGER OR GROUP.
Bear that in mind and good luck.
MURT
boytoy4princessBH
Well, I see not posting about the nitwit does not work. Now what? Someone using this username:
boytoy4princessBH.
came into what is an otherwise dead chat room and entertained us for a while.
This also is a rather odd coincidence. Someone sent me a rather graphiic photo with no more text than, "Guess who?" Now either that photo is another PORN QUEEN HOAX, or we have a late 40ish woman who likes her "men" quite young.
Add to that the REAL interesting UNSOLICITED e-mailings and so on that I keep getting about this group, and it looks like they are bored again and cannot do without playing their games.
The photo is a bit too graphic for this page, but it is REAL interesting where the website is that the photo came from.
Seems that a certain someone cannot function without me or my room. Thanks for the proof.
MURT
boytoy4princessBH.
came into what is an otherwise dead chat room and entertained us for a while.
This also is a rather odd coincidence. Someone sent me a rather graphiic photo with no more text than, "Guess who?" Now either that photo is another PORN QUEEN HOAX, or we have a late 40ish woman who likes her "men" quite young.
Add to that the REAL interesting UNSOLICITED e-mailings and so on that I keep getting about this group, and it looks like they are bored again and cannot do without playing their games.
The photo is a bit too graphic for this page, but it is REAL interesting where the website is that the photo came from.
Seems that a certain someone cannot function without me or my room. Thanks for the proof.
MURT
Saturday, December 12, 2009
OH MY
WELL WELL WELL, WHY AM I NOT SUPRISED? PRINCESS MUST HAVE WATCHED THE PRE-TRIAL AND HEARD THE REMARK ABOUT THE LAW ON RECORDING. UH OH.
PUT THE LINKS IN THE "PRIVATE" VAULT.
PRIVATE LOCATION OR NOT, THE FILES ARE ILLEGAL.
MURT
PUT THE LINKS IN THE "PRIVATE" VAULT.
PRIVATE LOCATION OR NOT, THE FILES ARE ILLEGAL.
MURT
A LIE OF OMMISION
The illegally recorded phone call is on Youtube. It is in two parts. I added the times together and compared them to my cellphone which logs the call length. Almost 4 minutes of the call is missing. Odd that we do not hear a hang up tone.Perhaps her dog at the extra minutes. The minutes where I offered the letter.
I also find it interesting that NANA's voice is LOUD AND CLEAR, and my voice is low and distant. ANY audio tech will tell you that both sides should have been of equal volume.
This is also clear cut evidence that someone has broken the law. You cannot record someone without their permission.
MURT
I also find it interesting that NANA's voice is LOUD AND CLEAR, and my voice is low and distant. ANY audio tech will tell you that both sides should have been of equal volume.
This is also clear cut evidence that someone has broken the law. You cannot record someone without their permission.
MURT
http://www.stopthecyberbullying.blogspot.com
http://www.stopthecyberbullying.blogspot.com/?zx=f92a876b5f6d6ca3
There has been an Anon posting here from quite some time. This Anon has her own blog. I had said earlier that THIS blog is going in a different direction. This is a step in that regard. The author of the above mentioned blog will be the primary source for articles on the topic of cyberbullying and how it relates to events over the past three years.
Just one note. This person is no fan of mine. She was one of my harshest critics for years and still holds to some strong criticisms of my actions. She does, however, also has strong criticisms of what has been done by others.
Unless events warrant, I have other topics that need to be covered.
I have other fish to fry. Time to thaw them out.
MURT
There has been an Anon posting here from quite some time. This Anon has her own blog. I had said earlier that THIS blog is going in a different direction. This is a step in that regard. The author of the above mentioned blog will be the primary source for articles on the topic of cyberbullying and how it relates to events over the past three years.
Just one note. This person is no fan of mine. She was one of my harshest critics for years and still holds to some strong criticisms of my actions. She does, however, also has strong criticisms of what has been done by others.
Unless events warrant, I have other topics that need to be covered.
I have other fish to fry. Time to thaw them out.
MURT
THE PLAY
I see a double standard over in the Busy Bees room which is nothing new. On one side there are PM's out there (The PM stands for PRIVATE messages)of alleged conversations between me and person or persons unknown
Also,the pm's were in a venue that was PRIVATE which means that the content never would have been seen by the public had they not been released, doing unintended harm to the persons mentioned in them and the remote possability that they may be used by a defense atty to acquit an otherwise guilty mother of a child (yes I know, innocent until proven guilty)who murdered her.
The PM's raise the distinct possibility that a Florida resident may have had something to do with the murder and disapperance of Caylee Marie Anthony.
That alone makes the release of these PM's a vary unwise thing to do. I am beginning to wonder if it is the intent of this group to perhaps get Casey acquitted? Judging by their actions, this is something to think about.
The content of these PM's do not shed a favorable light on me, that is true.
Here is the problem, however. We do not know who the other person is. The content of the Pm's both released and not released that included statements by this OTHER person were equally graphic as well.
The defense council could easily argue that this OTHER person could have assisted Zanny the nanny in the kidnap and murder of Caylee as well as disposing of her body. The other person in the PM could be one of her former boyfriends such as the one who is the son of a prominent minister. Did Princess not think that the defense would consider that? Perhaps yes, perhaps no.
I wonder if a year or two from now if NANANC Princess and the others will have a big celebration after the jury stands up and says:
"Your honor, we the jury find the defendant Casey Marie Anthony NOT GUILTY of FIRST DEGREE MURDER." Hooray!
One final point regarding the PM'S.
I am known, my name is out there, I live within a short drive of any number of law enforcement agencies.
This other person, on the other hand, Is an unknown, we do not know name, location, age, gender nor do we know this:
IS THIS OTHER PERSON A PEDOPHILE?
HAS THIS PERSON BEEN CONVICTED OF A SEX CRIME
IS THIS PERSON A REGIGESTERED SEX OFFENDER?
IS THERE, RIGHT NOW, A CHILD IN DANGER?
IS THERE, RIGHT NOW, A DEAD CHILD SOMEPLACE?
Well, unles or until someone comes forward with the COMPLETE story, we will never know.
Lock your doors and load your guns folks, there is a boogie man/woman out there ready and willing and undetected, to do unspeakable harm all because Princess decided to play games.
Now we move on to my former Chief Administrator. This piece of work is supposed to be a bible thumping, PRAISE JESUS!!! christian. She goes into a fit of rage and even goes on a blogtalk radio station to state her "shock and anger" at what is in those PM's.
She and her band of merry maidans,light their tourches and grab their pitchforks and march into the night after the evil Murt.
In the midst of all of this,the aptly named Crazy Cajun along with our well known Princess, who seems to have an unorthodox interest in pornography or at least, "adult entertainment" come up with the bright idea of having a "show." A sort of an off broadway production on the internet.
UNLIKE THE PM'S THIS LITTLE STUNT IS DONE IN A CHAT ROOM ACCESSIBLE BY THE PUBLIC.
Now rather than do what virtually every film, tv or other creative unit does as standard practice and use fake names as cited in the standard disclaimer seen in the credits of the production, these dingbats decided, along with their minions to use REAL PEOPLE.
That is bad enough, but then they decide to use the REAL NAME OF MINORS KNOWN TO THE AUDIENCE OF THIS LITTLE PLAY.
I, for the life of me, do not understand why Kari has not sought out LEGAL COUNCIL as of yet. If she has not, I would urge her to do so.
The depictions and the language used toward her family and her CHILDREN are patently offensive. There is absolutely NO EXCUSE for this. There is also criminal and civil liability at play here.
Criminal: Audio depection of a minor engaged in a sex act.
Civil: Intentional infliction of emotional distress on a minor.
The "we were just kidding and this was just an act" disclaimer does not cut it.
Yes, the material is off the internet, or is it?
I would not be the least bit shocked that this little play is hidden somewhere deep within the bowls of You Make MY Butt Hurt or other sites owned by the porn queen ready and waiting for her minions to enjoy.
And since it is likely that the person at the other end of the PM's is a devotee of her at the vary least. he would have obtained copies for the enjoyment (lulz) of his group of merry men both young and old through out THE WORLD.
Let us not forget that the participants and audience of this little production likely wanted a keepsake of this piece of "entertainment." I see at least 5 copies sitting on a hard drive in a pc just waiting to be listened to again and again, perhaps while engaging in a little":love making" of their own,
Kari and her family and I guess me by extension, are now, unwanted by all of us, INTERNATIONAL PORN STARS.
SOME CHRISTIAN NANANC TURNED OUT TO BE.
PRAISE THE LORD!!!
(yeah right)
MURT
Also,the pm's were in a venue that was PRIVATE which means that the content never would have been seen by the public had they not been released, doing unintended harm to the persons mentioned in them and the remote possability that they may be used by a defense atty to acquit an otherwise guilty mother of a child (yes I know, innocent until proven guilty)who murdered her.
The PM's raise the distinct possibility that a Florida resident may have had something to do with the murder and disapperance of Caylee Marie Anthony.
That alone makes the release of these PM's a vary unwise thing to do. I am beginning to wonder if it is the intent of this group to perhaps get Casey acquitted? Judging by their actions, this is something to think about.
The content of these PM's do not shed a favorable light on me, that is true.
Here is the problem, however. We do not know who the other person is. The content of the Pm's both released and not released that included statements by this OTHER person were equally graphic as well.
The defense council could easily argue that this OTHER person could have assisted Zanny the nanny in the kidnap and murder of Caylee as well as disposing of her body. The other person in the PM could be one of her former boyfriends such as the one who is the son of a prominent minister. Did Princess not think that the defense would consider that? Perhaps yes, perhaps no.
I wonder if a year or two from now if NANANC Princess and the others will have a big celebration after the jury stands up and says:
"Your honor, we the jury find the defendant Casey Marie Anthony NOT GUILTY of FIRST DEGREE MURDER." Hooray!
One final point regarding the PM'S.
I am known, my name is out there, I live within a short drive of any number of law enforcement agencies.
This other person, on the other hand, Is an unknown, we do not know name, location, age, gender nor do we know this:
IS THIS OTHER PERSON A PEDOPHILE?
HAS THIS PERSON BEEN CONVICTED OF A SEX CRIME
IS THIS PERSON A REGIGESTERED SEX OFFENDER?
IS THERE, RIGHT NOW, A CHILD IN DANGER?
IS THERE, RIGHT NOW, A DEAD CHILD SOMEPLACE?
Well, unles or until someone comes forward with the COMPLETE story, we will never know.
Lock your doors and load your guns folks, there is a boogie man/woman out there ready and willing and undetected, to do unspeakable harm all because Princess decided to play games.
Now we move on to my former Chief Administrator. This piece of work is supposed to be a bible thumping, PRAISE JESUS!!! christian. She goes into a fit of rage and even goes on a blogtalk radio station to state her "shock and anger" at what is in those PM's.
She and her band of merry maidans,light their tourches and grab their pitchforks and march into the night after the evil Murt.
In the midst of all of this,the aptly named Crazy Cajun along with our well known Princess, who seems to have an unorthodox interest in pornography or at least, "adult entertainment" come up with the bright idea of having a "show." A sort of an off broadway production on the internet.
UNLIKE THE PM'S THIS LITTLE STUNT IS DONE IN A CHAT ROOM ACCESSIBLE BY THE PUBLIC.
Now rather than do what virtually every film, tv or other creative unit does as standard practice and use fake names as cited in the standard disclaimer seen in the credits of the production, these dingbats decided, along with their minions to use REAL PEOPLE.
That is bad enough, but then they decide to use the REAL NAME OF MINORS KNOWN TO THE AUDIENCE OF THIS LITTLE PLAY.
I, for the life of me, do not understand why Kari has not sought out LEGAL COUNCIL as of yet. If she has not, I would urge her to do so.
The depictions and the language used toward her family and her CHILDREN are patently offensive. There is absolutely NO EXCUSE for this. There is also criminal and civil liability at play here.
Criminal: Audio depection of a minor engaged in a sex act.
Civil: Intentional infliction of emotional distress on a minor.
The "we were just kidding and this was just an act" disclaimer does not cut it.
Yes, the material is off the internet, or is it?
I would not be the least bit shocked that this little play is hidden somewhere deep within the bowls of You Make MY Butt Hurt or other sites owned by the porn queen ready and waiting for her minions to enjoy.
And since it is likely that the person at the other end of the PM's is a devotee of her at the vary least. he would have obtained copies for the enjoyment (lulz) of his group of merry men both young and old through out THE WORLD.
Let us not forget that the participants and audience of this little production likely wanted a keepsake of this piece of "entertainment." I see at least 5 copies sitting on a hard drive in a pc just waiting to be listened to again and again, perhaps while engaging in a little":love making" of their own,
Kari and her family and I guess me by extension, are now, unwanted by all of us, INTERNATIONAL PORN STARS.
SOME CHRISTIAN NANANC TURNED OUT TO BE.
PRAISE THE LORD!!!
(yeah right)
MURT
Friday, December 11, 2009
THE CALL
NANANC called me to complain about the article where someone had sent me a web page that had almost the same identical name as hers, was from the same city as hers, had grandchildren and was almost the same age (I still do not know her exact age.
The original article contained only the link without comment.
NANANC pointed out to me that she is a licensed RN in the state where she lives. I had already posted the information sent shortly before her call. After a short period of time the call was ended and I printed a retraction based on what NANANC told me.
Then something interesting happened. Someone sent me a comment stating that there would be an audio link that I would not like and neither would Kari.
As It turns out, there is audio of the call somewhere "out there." Now NANANC puts a tag line on Paltalk that read something like "news flash, I gave permission."
Then the comments and information start coming in that Princess is airing the call on You Make My Butt Hurt. Since I am unable to access the site, I cannot listen to the call to see why my offer to NANANC to put an UNEDITED letter on this blog explaining her side of the RN story did not get heard or recorded.
If NANANC would have handled this like an adult instead of a ranting ASSHOLE, she could have sent the letter if she wanted to. Rather then do that she has kept up her idodic tirade. .
Now, two things.
A call was made to my phone. I have the number of who made the call. The person later admitted she made the call after first LYING about it.
Second SOMEONE recorded the call. Someone put that RECORDING on a website.
For the uneducated out there IT IS AGAINST THE LAW TO RECORD ANY COMMUNICATION THAT WOULD BE ASSUMED TO BE PRIVATE UNLESS ALL PARTIES AGREE TO ALLOW IT.
I DID NOT GIVE ANYONE PERMISSION TO RECORD OR OTHERWISE MAKE A RECORD OF THE CALL.
THE LAW IN FLORIDA IS VARY CLEAR ON THE MATTER. I CITED IT SEVERAL TIMES AND ANYONE WHO HAS "GOOGLE AS THEIR FRIEND." CAN LOOK IT UP.
Now someone think about some of the comments that have already been posted. There are claims that this was not a phone call. Well, ok, how did it get sent to my PHONE? How did the TELEPHONE NUMBER of the person who CALLED me get in my caller ID and also is recorded at Embarq, my PHONE company?
If the call was NOT recorded, how was one comment made where the person listened to the call THREE TIMES?
That must have been one remarkable feet of engineering.
NOW THIS IS THE LAST I AM GOING TO DISCUSS THIS AND THERE WILL BE NO COMMENTS POSTED TO THE BLOG. THE SUBJECT IS CLOSED
MURT
The original article contained only the link without comment.
NANANC pointed out to me that she is a licensed RN in the state where she lives. I had already posted the information sent shortly before her call. After a short period of time the call was ended and I printed a retraction based on what NANANC told me.
Then something interesting happened. Someone sent me a comment stating that there would be an audio link that I would not like and neither would Kari.
As It turns out, there is audio of the call somewhere "out there." Now NANANC puts a tag line on Paltalk that read something like "news flash, I gave permission."
Then the comments and information start coming in that Princess is airing the call on You Make My Butt Hurt. Since I am unable to access the site, I cannot listen to the call to see why my offer to NANANC to put an UNEDITED letter on this blog explaining her side of the RN story did not get heard or recorded.
If NANANC would have handled this like an adult instead of a ranting ASSHOLE, she could have sent the letter if she wanted to. Rather then do that she has kept up her idodic tirade. .
Now, two things.
A call was made to my phone. I have the number of who made the call. The person later admitted she made the call after first LYING about it.
Second SOMEONE recorded the call. Someone put that RECORDING on a website.
For the uneducated out there IT IS AGAINST THE LAW TO RECORD ANY COMMUNICATION THAT WOULD BE ASSUMED TO BE PRIVATE UNLESS ALL PARTIES AGREE TO ALLOW IT.
I DID NOT GIVE ANYONE PERMISSION TO RECORD OR OTHERWISE MAKE A RECORD OF THE CALL.
THE LAW IN FLORIDA IS VARY CLEAR ON THE MATTER. I CITED IT SEVERAL TIMES AND ANYONE WHO HAS "GOOGLE AS THEIR FRIEND." CAN LOOK IT UP.
Now someone think about some of the comments that have already been posted. There are claims that this was not a phone call. Well, ok, how did it get sent to my PHONE? How did the TELEPHONE NUMBER of the person who CALLED me get in my caller ID and also is recorded at Embarq, my PHONE company?
If the call was NOT recorded, how was one comment made where the person listened to the call THREE TIMES?
That must have been one remarkable feet of engineering.
NOW THIS IS THE LAST I AM GOING TO DISCUSS THIS AND THERE WILL BE NO COMMENTS POSTED TO THE BLOG. THE SUBJECT IS CLOSED
MURT
MURTHAVEN FLORIDA
As of 12:00 NOON Dec, 11 2009, MURTHAVEN FLORIDA is now the official blog of
Murthavenflorida.com and Murtwitnessone.com.
This blog will remain as a source of information limited to the few followers here and the off the web forum members that read it.
The tone and content of the blog will change as time goes on.
Another change will be that comments to whatever has or will be written on this blog will be more strictly moderated. I have been lax for far too long in allowing comments that no other blog owner would or does tolerate. That ends now. I do read all comments, both published or unpublished. What comments do and do not pass muster will be apparent as time goes on. As I have always stated, thiis is not a bash MURT site, so that should give potental commenters insight as to what will and will not be allowed.
From this day on, however, what I choose to be published will be much more restricted than in the past.
It is my blog and I will run it the way I see fit.
MURT
Murthavenflorida.com and Murtwitnessone.com.
This blog will remain as a source of information limited to the few followers here and the off the web forum members that read it.
The tone and content of the blog will change as time goes on.
Another change will be that comments to whatever has or will be written on this blog will be more strictly moderated. I have been lax for far too long in allowing comments that no other blog owner would or does tolerate. That ends now. I do read all comments, both published or unpublished. What comments do and do not pass muster will be apparent as time goes on. As I have always stated, thiis is not a bash MURT site, so that should give potental commenters insight as to what will and will not be allowed.
From this day on, however, what I choose to be published will be much more restricted than in the past.
It is my blog and I will run it the way I see fit.
MURT
PLA N B
I GUESS IT IS TIME TO PUT A SORT OF "PLAN B" INTO ACTION. OVER THE PAST FEW MONTHS AS I HAVE TRIED TO SOLVE THE PUZZLE OF HOW AND WHY THE "HACKERS" AS I CALLED THEM DECIDED TO MAKE ME THEIR TARGET AND ANSWER THE WHO WHAT WHY AND WHERE OF ALL OF THIS.
THE COURSE OF ACTION THAT ME AND THE GROUP TOOK IN ORDER TO ACCOMPLISH THIS DID GO ALONG WAY TOWARD THAT GOAL. I SEE NOW THAT SOME IDEAS AND ADVICE THAT HAS BEEN GIVEN TO ME RECENTLY NEEDED TO BE HEEDED AND PUT INTO PLACE.
IT IS CLEAR THAT CERTAIN THINGS WILL NOT WORK AND CERTAIN PEOPLE DO NOT APPRECIATE FAVORS DONE FOR THEM.
FINE, THE PROTECTIONS THAT HAD BEEN PUT IN PLACE WILL BE REMOVED. THIS SHOULD PROVE INTERESTING DOWN THE ROAD.
STAY TUNED.
MURT
THE COURSE OF ACTION THAT ME AND THE GROUP TOOK IN ORDER TO ACCOMPLISH THIS DID GO ALONG WAY TOWARD THAT GOAL. I SEE NOW THAT SOME IDEAS AND ADVICE THAT HAS BEEN GIVEN TO ME RECENTLY NEEDED TO BE HEEDED AND PUT INTO PLACE.
IT IS CLEAR THAT CERTAIN THINGS WILL NOT WORK AND CERTAIN PEOPLE DO NOT APPRECIATE FAVORS DONE FOR THEM.
FINE, THE PROTECTIONS THAT HAD BEEN PUT IN PLACE WILL BE REMOVED. THIS SHOULD PROVE INTERESTING DOWN THE ROAD.
STAY TUNED.
MURT
Thursday, December 10, 2009
DUMB CRIMINALS DEPARTMENT
A PIECE OF ADVICE:
THE NEXT TIME SOMEONE MAKES A PHONE CALL WITH THE INTENTION OF DOING AN ILLEGAL ACT, THEY MAY WANT TO PICK A PHONE THAT HAS A NUMBER THAT THEY HAD NOT GIVEN ME.
MURT
THE NEXT TIME SOMEONE MAKES A PHONE CALL WITH THE INTENTION OF DOING AN ILLEGAL ACT, THEY MAY WANT TO PICK A PHONE THAT HAS A NUMBER THAT THEY HAD NOT GIVEN ME.
MURT
RUDE
As I have said in an earlier article, there was once a time in a super PM session with my administrators I stated "I do not trust anyone on the internet."
NANANC was one of those who was there. The stunt by her and Princess bore out the reason for my statement.
The family I was raised in believe in manners and ethics. EVERYONE knows that it is RUDE to record ANY private conversation with someone WITHOUT THEIR KNOWLEDGE OR PERMISSION. In most cases IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
Well NANANC did just that. She must have taken lessons from the soundboard folks. Had I known that NANANC intended to record the conversation, I would not have accepted the call. NANANC knows full well that I DO NOT give anyone permission to record ANY of my conversations, regardless of the source.
For her to do that is not only highly unethical and demonstrates a total lack of character, it is also a violation of FLORIDA law. We are a two party state. That means that ALL parties to a private conversation MUST be told the conversation is being recorded and MUST GIVE THEIR CONSENT to the call.
I know for certain that if I did that to Princess or Michelle they would be raising holy hell about it.
I am profoundly disappointed to see that NANANC does NOT possess the honesty and integrity that I had thought she had when I appointed her LEAD administrator. I have never, ever been so disappointed in someone in my life as I am with NANANC. I wish I had never met her and I certainly never EVER want to talk to her again, either on the phone or on the internet.
MURT
NANANC was one of those who was there. The stunt by her and Princess bore out the reason for my statement.
The family I was raised in believe in manners and ethics. EVERYONE knows that it is RUDE to record ANY private conversation with someone WITHOUT THEIR KNOWLEDGE OR PERMISSION. In most cases IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
Well NANANC did just that. She must have taken lessons from the soundboard folks. Had I known that NANANC intended to record the conversation, I would not have accepted the call. NANANC knows full well that I DO NOT give anyone permission to record ANY of my conversations, regardless of the source.
For her to do that is not only highly unethical and demonstrates a total lack of character, it is also a violation of FLORIDA law. We are a two party state. That means that ALL parties to a private conversation MUST be told the conversation is being recorded and MUST GIVE THEIR CONSENT to the call.
I know for certain that if I did that to Princess or Michelle they would be raising holy hell about it.
I am profoundly disappointed to see that NANANC does NOT possess the honesty and integrity that I had thought she had when I appointed her LEAD administrator. I have never, ever been so disappointed in someone in my life as I am with NANANC. I wish I had never met her and I certainly never EVER want to talk to her again, either on the phone or on the internet.
MURT
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
THE STALKERS CLUB
http://www.box.net/shared/mnjmh1ylkd
IN THIS CLIP:
MOMMIESDOLLIES1 AND OTHERS ARE HEARD SEARCHING FOR MY BROTHER'S HOUSE, SHE IS ALSO TRYING TO FIND THE CEMATARY WHERE MY FATHER WAS BURIED ALMOST 40 YEARS AGO.
http://www.box.net/shared/nqqu9lzfya
THEY ARE TRYING TO LOCATE MY BROTHER OVERSEAS. NOW WHAT DOES MY FAMILY HAVE TO DO WITH MY POSTING ON THIS BLOG?
MURT
IN THIS CLIP:
MOMMIESDOLLIES1 AND OTHERS ARE HEARD SEARCHING FOR MY BROTHER'S HOUSE, SHE IS ALSO TRYING TO FIND THE CEMATARY WHERE MY FATHER WAS BURIED ALMOST 40 YEARS AGO.
http://www.box.net/shared/nqqu9lzfya
THEY ARE TRYING TO LOCATE MY BROTHER OVERSEAS. NOW WHAT DOES MY FAMILY HAVE TO DO WITH MY POSTING ON THIS BLOG?
MURT
THE TRUTH NEVER LIES
http://66.70.86.248/Profile.aspx?member=nanaNC
In light of a conversation I have just had with NANANC I have decided to do a total rewrite of this article. According to her this is the situation:
First. Through and interesting coincidence, the woman listed in the profile as working at the Gas Station is NOT NANANC but someone with a name almost Identical. According to NANANC, she is 5 years older.
Also, as I stated before, she is currently licensed as a Registered Nurse in the state where she resides.
Next, she explained to me that the reason she did not want me writing any more blogs was that she did not want anything "to come back on her." At the time I told her that I was going to stop writing on the blog, things had stopped, but only for a few days. Princess and co were not content to stay quiet and it was necessary for me to defend myself....again.
I have told her that if she wants to, she can write a letter that I will post UNEDITED explaining HER side of this.
This is how I am. I keep things out in the open. I do not hide in secret blogs. If someone has good reasons to challange something I say or write, I allow what I am going to allow NANA to do.
All of you keep this in mind when reading things out there that people say are true. Like the saying says "you cannot believe everything you read on the internet." A good deal out there attributed to me and written about me is not true.
,
FINAL UPDATE:
IN LIGHT OF NANANC'S RECENT CONDUCT IN NOT BEING FORTHCOMING ABOUT THE FACT THAT THERE WAS AT LEAST ONE OTHER PERSON LISTENING IN (TINK) AND THAT THE CALL MAY HAVE BEEN RECORDED WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE OR PERMISSION, I CANNOT NOW BE CERTAIN IF SHE HAS BEEN FORTHCOMING AND HONEST ABOUT HER AND THE GAS STATION CLERK BEING TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE.
I TOOK NANA AT HER WORD. IN LIGHT OF THESE RECENT EVENTS, THIS IS SOMETHING I CAN NO LONGER DO.
I LEAVE IT UP TO THE READERS TO DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES IF SHE IS WHAT SHE SAYS SHE IS...........OR NOT.
MURT
In light of a conversation I have just had with NANANC I have decided to do a total rewrite of this article. According to her this is the situation:
First. Through and interesting coincidence, the woman listed in the profile as working at the Gas Station is NOT NANANC but someone with a name almost Identical. According to NANANC, she is 5 years older.
Also, as I stated before, she is currently licensed as a Registered Nurse in the state where she resides.
Next, she explained to me that the reason she did not want me writing any more blogs was that she did not want anything "to come back on her." At the time I told her that I was going to stop writing on the blog, things had stopped, but only for a few days. Princess and co were not content to stay quiet and it was necessary for me to defend myself....again.
I have told her that if she wants to, she can write a letter that I will post UNEDITED explaining HER side of this.
This is how I am. I keep things out in the open. I do not hide in secret blogs. If someone has good reasons to challange something I say or write, I allow what I am going to allow NANA to do.
All of you keep this in mind when reading things out there that people say are true. Like the saying says "you cannot believe everything you read on the internet." A good deal out there attributed to me and written about me is not true.
,
FINAL UPDATE:
IN LIGHT OF NANANC'S RECENT CONDUCT IN NOT BEING FORTHCOMING ABOUT THE FACT THAT THERE WAS AT LEAST ONE OTHER PERSON LISTENING IN (TINK) AND THAT THE CALL MAY HAVE BEEN RECORDED WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE OR PERMISSION, I CANNOT NOW BE CERTAIN IF SHE HAS BEEN FORTHCOMING AND HONEST ABOUT HER AND THE GAS STATION CLERK BEING TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE.
I TOOK NANA AT HER WORD. IN LIGHT OF THESE RECENT EVENTS, THIS IS SOMETHING I CAN NO LONGER DO.
I LEAVE IT UP TO THE READERS TO DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES IF SHE IS WHAT SHE SAYS SHE IS...........OR NOT.
MURT
Monday, December 7, 2009
PRAY ON THE WEAK,IGNORE THE STRONG
The latest debate proves a point that I have been making all along. The haters and Michelle are after me because I am easy pray. I require no effort. I have no influence and I have no resources. Michelle and Princess through her have the resources and contacts to squash me like a bug.
They are weak and powerless, however, against those like Pat Brown and the other "celebs." They know their limits. They prod and poke the hornet's nest just enough to make themselves look big to their fans and minions. To the celebs they are nothing but nuisances that are part of being famous.
As long as they remain just nuisances, they are safe. They can pretend to be strong, just like going after easy prey like me allows them to be strong.
Without me, they would have to find another easy target. Someone weak without the vast resources to defend themselves against their oppression.
Others have tried and failed. Others have tried and capulitated rather than face their wrath..
I am no challange to them, just an easy illusion of their power. Someday they are going to make the mistake of being more than a nuisance to someone with more power and influence than me. They will then be squashed like the little bugs they are.
I can't wait.
MURT
They are weak and powerless, however, against those like Pat Brown and the other "celebs." They know their limits. They prod and poke the hornet's nest just enough to make themselves look big to their fans and minions. To the celebs they are nothing but nuisances that are part of being famous.
As long as they remain just nuisances, they are safe. They can pretend to be strong, just like going after easy prey like me allows them to be strong.
Without me, they would have to find another easy target. Someone weak without the vast resources to defend themselves against their oppression.
Others have tried and failed. Others have tried and capulitated rather than face their wrath..
I am no challange to them, just an easy illusion of their power. Someday they are going to make the mistake of being more than a nuisance to someone with more power and influence than me. They will then be squashed like the little bugs they are.
I can't wait.
MURT
Monday, November 30, 2009
HUH? To Stalk or not to stalk.
Some rather odd comments about the issue of stalking on the internet have been circulating on the blogs lately.
These complaints claim that the vary act of visiting a PUBLIC Twitter account that has a PUBLIC link to a blog that deals mainly with True Crime cases is Stalking.
That is probably the dumbest thing if not the most ludicrous thing I have ever heard.
It seems to me that if person A: is concerned over relatives tracking her down over a so called "tax case," she would have been well advised not to write the serious accusations against them in a PUBLIC BLOG.
This same person A would also have been well advised NOT to keep setting up the large number of various web sites where she exposes herself to be "researched" by those she has had issues with in the past, long before any of us ever heard of each other.
The same goes for person B: SHE chose to put up the Twitter account, the blog site, the Facebook site and who knows how many others OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC. NOT ONE of these sites are private or even require passwords or permissions to enter.
On the flip side I have been told that someone going into My past, ie: Obituaries, Driver's license checks, requests for my UNLISTED phone numbers, and so on and so forth is NOT STALKING!
Well as I said in my Hypocrite article, MAKE UP YOUR MIND!
You cannot have it both ways. IF your claim of being stalked, ms McKee and MS. Goddard are valid.....
SO ARE MINE.
MURT
These complaints claim that the vary act of visiting a PUBLIC Twitter account that has a PUBLIC link to a blog that deals mainly with True Crime cases is Stalking.
That is probably the dumbest thing if not the most ludicrous thing I have ever heard.
It seems to me that if person A: is concerned over relatives tracking her down over a so called "tax case," she would have been well advised not to write the serious accusations against them in a PUBLIC BLOG.
This same person A would also have been well advised NOT to keep setting up the large number of various web sites where she exposes herself to be "researched" by those she has had issues with in the past, long before any of us ever heard of each other.
The same goes for person B: SHE chose to put up the Twitter account, the blog site, the Facebook site and who knows how many others OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC. NOT ONE of these sites are private or even require passwords or permissions to enter.
On the flip side I have been told that someone going into My past, ie: Obituaries, Driver's license checks, requests for my UNLISTED phone numbers, and so on and so forth is NOT STALKING!
Well as I said in my Hypocrite article, MAKE UP YOUR MIND!
You cannot have it both ways. IF your claim of being stalked, ms McKee and MS. Goddard are valid.....
SO ARE MINE.
MURT
Friday, November 27, 2009
Hypocrite
I was sent a link, today, of the Twitters of Michelle McKee where she is attacking Pat Brown and company, accusing them of "stalking her".
She then links quite a number of screen shots alleging Google and Zabba searches of her personal information.
The only reason this needs to be brought up her is that THIS IS PRECISELY WHAT I HAVE BEEN ACCUSING THE "OTHERS" OF DOING.
However, when I DO THE ACCUSING, I am told that anything on the internet is PUBLIC INFORMATION.
That is, when it has to do with ME.
When it is done to others it is considered STALKING!
To me they are HYPOCRITES!
You cannot have it both ways.
MURTWITNESSONE
She then links quite a number of screen shots alleging Google and Zabba searches of her personal information.
The only reason this needs to be brought up her is that THIS IS PRECISELY WHAT I HAVE BEEN ACCUSING THE "OTHERS" OF DOING.
However, when I DO THE ACCUSING, I am told that anything on the internet is PUBLIC INFORMATION.
That is, when it has to do with ME.
When it is done to others it is considered STALKING!
To me they are HYPOCRITES!
You cannot have it both ways.
MURTWITNESSONE
Saturday, November 14, 2009
BUSTED YET AGAIN.
There has been some nitwit that has been posting that "they" have not been bothering or mentioning us for the last 6 weeks. Well, that turns out to be a LIE suprise, suprise. It seems they like to set up IMPERSONATOR rooms on Paltalk. I guess there are some OTHER PEOPLE that needs to get a life:
I HOPE I SPELLED HYPOCRITE CORRECTLY BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE........IN ADDITION TO BEING LIARS AND STALKERS!
MURTWITNESSONE
Friday, November 13, 2009
BUSTED
MEET PRINCESS THE STALKER
REGARDING CMOF2
Since someone has decided to make an issue of CMOF2, I decided to write a separate article in regards to her.
CMof2 has been around since the Trenton Duckett case and is most familar with what errors of judgment I made in regards to that case.
Her comments to me had to do, for the most part, with that case. As I used to tell people at that time, I admitted to my mistakes in judgement and had learned from them.
In a single letter to me, she explained her concerns over what was done to my by Princess and her minions. She still holds to what she told me in earlier comments in regards to the way I handled myself in the Duckett case but became concerned about the way I was being smeared by the BH group. She is one of a growing number of BH members and those who know NANANC, MOMMIES, and TINK who are concerned about the actions that have been taken against me.
She is not nor never was "a mole." Princess dumped her because she thought she was a mole and boasted as much in the private area once she left. Princess still has moles. I get quite a few tips from them from time to time and from what I gather, things are quite interesting on the dark side.
In her paranoia, Princess dumped and subsequently angered several loyal members when she decided to "clean house,"
CMof2 came to me. I never sought her out and have not asked for any of the information she has.
MURTWITNESSONE
CMof2 has been around since the Trenton Duckett case and is most familar with what errors of judgment I made in regards to that case.
Her comments to me had to do, for the most part, with that case. As I used to tell people at that time, I admitted to my mistakes in judgement and had learned from them.
In a single letter to me, she explained her concerns over what was done to my by Princess and her minions. She still holds to what she told me in earlier comments in regards to the way I handled myself in the Duckett case but became concerned about the way I was being smeared by the BH group. She is one of a growing number of BH members and those who know NANANC, MOMMIES, and TINK who are concerned about the actions that have been taken against me.
She is not nor never was "a mole." Princess dumped her because she thought she was a mole and boasted as much in the private area once she left. Princess still has moles. I get quite a few tips from them from time to time and from what I gather, things are quite interesting on the dark side.
In her paranoia, Princess dumped and subsequently angered several loyal members when she decided to "clean house,"
CMof2 came to me. I never sought her out and have not asked for any of the information she has.
MURTWITNESSONE
Monday, November 9, 2009
WHY?
I simply cannot figure out why people who have sex offenses in their background get involved in missing children. There have been at least Two people exposed over the last two years and now there is a third.
Accusations have surfaced that the owner of Hearts 4 Haleigh is a registered sex offender from California:
Accusations have surfaced that the owner of Hearts 4 Haleigh is a registered sex offender from California:
According to the author of this Topix thread:
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/satsuma-fl/TU1HE06G6FBKFF0AN
Hobbit55 has quite a history. He was allegadly convicted of THREE counts of child molestation in October, 1992.
Details in this link:
http://www.appeal-democrat.com/news/area-44193-yuba-lincoln.html
In the conversation I had with the editor of the newspaper, he recalled that fliers were passed around warning residents of the presence of Mr. Lincoln.
The Editor was suprised, to say the least that Mr. Lincoln was operating a website having to do with a missing female child. Do note in the article in the above link that Mr. Lincoln was described by local law enforcement as having strong desires toward female children.
I have filed and am waiting on case information under California's FOIA laws and will update once these records are recieved.
People have often wondered why I posted my real name and information in light of the attacks against me over the past couple of years.
This incident is why.
ANYONE who does ANY kind of background check will find that I have NO criminal history of any kind let alone any having to do with ANY sexual offender convictions or listings.
I feel that ANYONE regardless of gender who has an internet presence relating to missing and abused children are duty bound to provide their legal name so that the public can be assured of who it is that are operating thse sites.
William K Murtaugh
MURTWITNESSONE
Thursday, October 29, 2009
CONUNDRUM
I find it rather odd that the haters are INCREASING their volley of attacks now that I have STOPPED all on location coverage of Missing Children cases and am working to change the format of any future live broadcasts.
They got what they wanted so why the continued attacks? The news van is parked and is not likely to be used anytime before the first of the year and beyond.
My chat room has sat idle for days and will likely shut down due to lack of use.
Yet they persist. They go off in their secret rooms and plot and scheme. They come to this small blog and make comment after comment wanting me to stop doing what I have already stopped doing.
They release stupid "public service" notices that are highly defamatory. They interfere with law enforcement investigations with bogus tips about me and so on.
The only thing I do in return is defend myself here against these horrendous attacks. Here in this insignificant little obscure blog.
Yup, I just do not get it.
MURTWTNESSONE
They got what they wanted so why the continued attacks? The news van is parked and is not likely to be used anytime before the first of the year and beyond.
My chat room has sat idle for days and will likely shut down due to lack of use.
Yet they persist. They go off in their secret rooms and plot and scheme. They come to this small blog and make comment after comment wanting me to stop doing what I have already stopped doing.
They release stupid "public service" notices that are highly defamatory. They interfere with law enforcement investigations with bogus tips about me and so on.
The only thing I do in return is defend myself here against these horrendous attacks. Here in this insignificant little obscure blog.
Yup, I just do not get it.
MURTWTNESSONE
HERE'S THE PROOF PART-2.
THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF WHEN THE SA OFFICE NOTIFIES ME OF A BULK DOCUMENT RELEASE.
The intro always tells me the nature of the files, be they bulk downloads or cd's as in the prior example. Most of the time cd's are made that are of audio interviews or bulk image files.
The doc stock issueances are almost always text documents with one or two rare exceptions where audio files were sent.
The latest bulk release consisted of 15 links. The screenshot only shows a portion of them due to the limitations of the software I use to screenshot with.
When the SA first released files, they made everyone pick them up at Kinkos at a cost of $50.00 for each release. After the media outlets protested the costs, they changed over to the current methods of bulk downloads or dvd/cd issuance. They will sometimes require blanks in trade for the discovery disks to keep their costs down.
In these cases they instruct EVERYONE to bring an equal number of discs when PICKING THEM UP at the reception area at the Fl ATTY OFFICE in the Orange County Courthouse Complex in downtown Orlando.
MURTWITNESSONE
MURTWITNESSONE
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
THE COWARDS OF THE COUNTY STRIKE AGAIN
Here we go again. I have not had the van out in months. I have a chat that is quite inactive. I do not do any broadcasts. I have not contacted one single member of any missing child case ie: The Somer Thompson case, The Cummings case and so on, yet someone insists sending out this UNSIGNED DEFAMATORY DOCUMENT!
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AZelYqGB5CHUZHB6dDR0Zl8zZjh0NGR3Y2o&hl=e
All you are doing in releasing this nonsense to the press is making yourself look foolish and reinforce my claim that I am being stalked relentlessly by those with criminal intentions.
Those out there who think that I have been lying about this stalking need only to view this document along with all the other material out there to see what is only a small fraction of what I have had to put up with.
PERHAPS ONE OF THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE SMEAR OF MY SITE IS THIS PIECE OF WORK.
LISTEN TO THE RATHER INTERESTING AUDIO CLIP IN THIS BLOG. HAD I KNOWN OF THIS STATEMENT, THIS PERSON WOULD HAVE BEEN BANNED LONG BEFORE NOW. SHAME ON MY ADMINS FOR NOT BRINGING THIS TO MY ATTENTION
http://socialissuestruthblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/crazycajun.html
MURTWITNESSONE
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AZelYqGB5CHUZHB6dDR0Zl8zZjh0NGR3Y2o&hl=e
All you are doing in releasing this nonsense to the press is making yourself look foolish and reinforce my claim that I am being stalked relentlessly by those with criminal intentions.
Those out there who think that I have been lying about this stalking need only to view this document along with all the other material out there to see what is only a small fraction of what I have had to put up with.
PERHAPS ONE OF THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE SMEAR OF MY SITE IS THIS PIECE OF WORK.
LISTEN TO THE RATHER INTERESTING AUDIO CLIP IN THIS BLOG. HAD I KNOWN OF THIS STATEMENT, THIS PERSON WOULD HAVE BEEN BANNED LONG BEFORE NOW. SHAME ON MY ADMINS FOR NOT BRINGING THIS TO MY ATTENTION
http://socialissuestruthblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/crazycajun.html
MURTWITNESSONE
Thursday, October 22, 2009
SPEAKING OF STAGED SUICIDES
Some recent talk about Fake suicides on another blog reminded me of an incident that occurred on my chat site almost a year ago. Our chat and broadcast was going on as usual when someone on the chat blurted out something to the effect" I am done and am going to end it all." I am not sure of the exact wording, but a number of the senior chatters picked up on it, one, notably, my former super admin NANANC.
Now, by some miracle, NANA supposedly able to contact this woman through pm and both calm her down and get her contact information and thus save the day. We were all happy about this and thanked NANANC and so on and so forth. As time went on the memory of this incident faded.
About a month or two later, I received an anon letter from someone claiming to be the "suicide lady" and that the whole thing was a hoax (joke in her words) that her and "some others" set up NANANC being one of them.
I dismissed the letter as being from someone who wanted to discredit NANANC as I was always getting these and other letters about some of the other Staffers and "trusted members" on the chat.
In hindsight, I should probably have paid more attention to this letter and some others that continued to arrive after that incident.
One thing that I was reminded of was that this person "went away" shortly after this incident and never came back into the chat. In fact, not anyone that I have talked to can remember who she was.
It is unfortunate that such a good deed may be, in fact, a cruel joke, a hoax, played by someone I trusted to care for something I worked so hard to build up and provide for my "roomies."
I once said to a number of admins in a closed session "I do not trust anyone on the internet, and unfortunately that includes all of you." They all agreed with me and all accepted that except for one, Mommiesdollies1.
In retrospect, my instincts were right, although I continued to trust two of them longer than I should have.
MURTWITNESSONE
Now, by some miracle, NANA supposedly able to contact this woman through pm and both calm her down and get her contact information and thus save the day. We were all happy about this and thanked NANANC and so on and so forth. As time went on the memory of this incident faded.
About a month or two later, I received an anon letter from someone claiming to be the "suicide lady" and that the whole thing was a hoax (joke in her words) that her and "some others" set up NANANC being one of them.
I dismissed the letter as being from someone who wanted to discredit NANANC as I was always getting these and other letters about some of the other Staffers and "trusted members" on the chat.
In hindsight, I should probably have paid more attention to this letter and some others that continued to arrive after that incident.
One thing that I was reminded of was that this person "went away" shortly after this incident and never came back into the chat. In fact, not anyone that I have talked to can remember who she was.
It is unfortunate that such a good deed may be, in fact, a cruel joke, a hoax, played by someone I trusted to care for something I worked so hard to build up and provide for my "roomies."
I once said to a number of admins in a closed session "I do not trust anyone on the internet, and unfortunately that includes all of you." They all agreed with me and all accepted that except for one, Mommiesdollies1.
In retrospect, my instincts were right, although I continued to trust two of them longer than I should have.
MURTWITNESSONE
Sunday, October 18, 2009
FROM GUEST AUTHOR: ANOTHER BEACONHELL EXPOSE'
THIS IS ANOTHER ARTICLE FROM A GUEST AUTHOR IN REGARDS TO PRINCESS OF BEACONHELL.COM.
THE DISCLAIMER REMAINS THE SAME: THE CONTENTS ARE SOLELY THOSE OF THE GUEST AUTHOR. THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED WITHIN THIS ARTICLE ARE SOLELY THOSE OF THE AUTHOR. ANY SOURCE INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED BY THE AUTHOR UNDER THE FAIR USE PROVISIONS.
Is Princess’s Claims About Murt Exposing her Private Info the Truth or Is It Her Way of Getting Attention?
By Stop Beaconhell
Princess of Beaconhell has claimed that Murt was the one who posted her name and her story about her relatives all over the internet. She claims that this has put her in some kind of danger. Is she being truthful about this claim? Murt has claimed in the post below it was Princess who is responsible for her relatives finding out where she is and her name.
Murt’s claim has led me to do some research on Princess . I decided the best place to start was to look on the internet. I had done this before when I did research on Murt. I googled posts by Beaconhell. I also did a google of posts by Princess of Beaconhell. One thing that came up was an old My Space by Beaconhell. This My Space was started April 2008. If I remember correctly but wasn’t April 2008, before Caylee Anthony was reported missing. Wasn’t that before Princess claims she even knew who Murt of Murtwitness one was? On the My Space page, there is a link to a site:
Read more at www.beaconhell.com
Here is the URL
www.myspace.com/ufoundmebitches
Princess mentions several people that live in DeKalb on this My Space Blog. There is even a comment by a person that Princess claims is committing Welfare Fraud and also calls her children a name that I will not mention on here. Princess also claims that this women and her friend are also stalking her(Sounds like the same thing she accuses Murt of) and Princess even posts this persons IP address on her blog on the internet. This women apparently claims that Princess is stalking her. We will never know the truth here because Princess cannot produce any proof to her claims that any person is stalking Princess. Here is the women’s comment to Princess on her claims:
I feel as though I should start by introducing myself to you, my name is _____. Although we have never met (I have seen you once), you have such a strong opinion of me and I feel the need to clear the air a bit and bring the truth back. I find it quite entertaining your need to ‘try’ to belittle myself and my family which you know absolutely nothing about except from inconsistent 'birdies'. If you knew me you would know that yes, I have had my share of good times and bad times, never hid it. You can label me as you wish. I have never been in a position to need to take handouts from anyone and never foresee the need. My closet is totally clean....if only you could say the same!?! If you knew me you would know that family and friends are the most important thing to me and for you to openly express your version of my life is quite amusing. If you knew me you would know that we pay every bill with no help. Never had help and never will need it. If you knew me you would know that I have been around the 'family' for 16 years. In all these years, I have seen and been apart of a lot of things, first hand, that you write about in a non-factual way, which shows how weak and incorrectly informed you are. Your spin on this whole situation is really quite sick and technically not needed. You feel like your voice really matters here but, in all honesty, doesn't. You’re just non-credible. Do I view your blog? I have never denied it. Did I have Ray view it? You better believe it BUT it was only when you felt the need to involve him and our children, which, yet again, you don’t even know. You keep bringing up karma and right carries might so why don't you start telling the truth straight out and let people come to their own conclusions. I have never said or blogged anything negative about you. I never mentioned your name or any ‘family’ members. Have I commented on the crazy stories and accusations that you have come up with? Again I have never denied that. Only from that (your blogs) can I judge you because again I only know you by name, as you know me. If you put your opinions out there you are asking and waiting to be judged. As much as don't like you I really can't hate you. I can only feel sorry for you. It has got to be hard not knowing where you fit in, in this life. I can only imagine the sad life you must be living. I only say so because you feel the need to speak hurtfully about people and children that you know absolutely nothing about. It takes a small person to speak in no or half truths. A real woman would find out everything there is to know before they open their mouths and well…insert foot. You can go on blogging in the delusional world you are living in and continue to try to hurt the others, known/unknown to you, by misrepresenting them. People that know me, us, and the situation I'm sure can and will draw their own conclusions. Thanks for letting me share the REALITY of all this to you.
Posted by _____ on Thursday, May 08, 2008 - 1:56 PM
On this My Space page Princess also mentions names of several people that live in DeKalb, welfare fraud, tax fraud, and how she loves to paint using her own shit.
It is obvious by this above post and by the URL that Princess already knew that her relatives knew where she was and what name she was using before Murt even was in the picture. If Princess didn’t want people to find her then WHY did she even start a My Space or Beaconhell? Was this all done so she could make people feel sorry for her? Did she start stalking Murt because her original plan backfired or is all of this drama just so she can draw attention to herself and her Beaconhell Blog?
In doing my research on both Princess and Murt, I have found there is no proof to Princess’s claims that Murt posted any info on the net about her. If there was it would of showed up under the searches I did on both of them. There is no proof that Murt is stalking Princess or that would of shown up too. There is proof that Princess is the one that is doing the stalking of Murt by using certain names that she has made up. One of those names is Zan aka Zanlaughsatyou aka Mistress. I find it kind of strange that Zan has no friends and that most of her followers on Twitter are actually spam sites or people that think she is a real person. In my research of Zan there isn’t much on the internet. What there is seems to link Zan to Beaconhell. On most sites her only friend is Beaconhell. Zan is actually Princess’s alter ego that happens to do all the posting on how Murt has done things to poor little Princess.
On Beaconhell, Zan and Princess tells people how they shouldn’t post on Murt’s websites or blogs. The reason is because Poor Princess has told her people how Murt will get mad and then he will post more threats to Princess.These people are so afraid that if they even read Murt’s blog that she will actually be in danger! Princess has never shown anything to them to prove this. The only thing Princess has posted on the internet that has anything to do with Murt is by people that used to be on his chat site, or people who were mad at him when he used to do his broadcasts. Princess doesn’t want any of the people on Beacon hell (except the few people that are in on this game she is playing)to post anything or read his blog because she doesn’t want them to know that she is not being stalked by Murt. Actually I wouldn’t be surprised that Murt isn’t her sending her emails telling her that if she doesn’t stop all of her threats against him he will take her to court. Is Princess really afraid that Murt might follow through and press charges of cyber stalking? Or is Princess afraid that someone might tell Murt what Princess is up to?
It seems to me that Princess seems to have a past of stalking and threatening people. . To Princess this is nothing but some type of game where she seems to enjoy hurting anyone that stands up to her or is weaker than her. She will attack anyone even innocent children just as long as she has people that believe Her little story and they feel sorry for her. It is sad tht an innocent person’s reputation is being destroyed by her posting these lies on the internet. She even goes as far as using a certain search site to search info on her enemies which will be the next thing that she has done that I will exposed.
Maybe Princess should contact some producer and have her little story put on TV. After all, It sounds like another Soap Opera to me.
THE DISCLAIMER REMAINS THE SAME: THE CONTENTS ARE SOLELY THOSE OF THE GUEST AUTHOR. THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED WITHIN THIS ARTICLE ARE SOLELY THOSE OF THE AUTHOR. ANY SOURCE INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED BY THE AUTHOR UNDER THE FAIR USE PROVISIONS.
Is Princess’s Claims About Murt Exposing her Private Info the Truth or Is It Her Way of Getting Attention?
By Stop Beaconhell
Princess of Beaconhell has claimed that Murt was the one who posted her name and her story about her relatives all over the internet. She claims that this has put her in some kind of danger. Is she being truthful about this claim? Murt has claimed in the post below it was Princess who is responsible for her relatives finding out where she is and her name.
Murt’s claim has led me to do some research on Princess . I decided the best place to start was to look on the internet. I had done this before when I did research on Murt. I googled posts by Beaconhell. I also did a google of posts by Princess of Beaconhell. One thing that came up was an old My Space by Beaconhell. This My Space was started April 2008. If I remember correctly but wasn’t April 2008, before Caylee Anthony was reported missing. Wasn’t that before Princess claims she even knew who Murt of Murtwitness one was? On the My Space page, there is a link to a site:
Read more at www.beaconhell.com
Here is the URL
www.myspace.com/ufoundmebitches
Princess mentions several people that live in DeKalb on this My Space Blog. There is even a comment by a person that Princess claims is committing Welfare Fraud and also calls her children a name that I will not mention on here. Princess also claims that this women and her friend are also stalking her(Sounds like the same thing she accuses Murt of) and Princess even posts this persons IP address on her blog on the internet. This women apparently claims that Princess is stalking her. We will never know the truth here because Princess cannot produce any proof to her claims that any person is stalking Princess. Here is the women’s comment to Princess on her claims:
I feel as though I should start by introducing myself to you, my name is _____. Although we have never met (I have seen you once), you have such a strong opinion of me and I feel the need to clear the air a bit and bring the truth back. I find it quite entertaining your need to ‘try’ to belittle myself and my family which you know absolutely nothing about except from inconsistent 'birdies'. If you knew me you would know that yes, I have had my share of good times and bad times, never hid it. You can label me as you wish. I have never been in a position to need to take handouts from anyone and never foresee the need. My closet is totally clean....if only you could say the same!?! If you knew me you would know that family and friends are the most important thing to me and for you to openly express your version of my life is quite amusing. If you knew me you would know that we pay every bill with no help. Never had help and never will need it. If you knew me you would know that I have been around the 'family' for 16 years. In all these years, I have seen and been apart of a lot of things, first hand, that you write about in a non-factual way, which shows how weak and incorrectly informed you are. Your spin on this whole situation is really quite sick and technically not needed. You feel like your voice really matters here but, in all honesty, doesn't. You’re just non-credible. Do I view your blog? I have never denied it. Did I have Ray view it? You better believe it BUT it was only when you felt the need to involve him and our children, which, yet again, you don’t even know. You keep bringing up karma and right carries might so why don't you start telling the truth straight out and let people come to their own conclusions. I have never said or blogged anything negative about you. I never mentioned your name or any ‘family’ members. Have I commented on the crazy stories and accusations that you have come up with? Again I have never denied that. Only from that (your blogs) can I judge you because again I only know you by name, as you know me. If you put your opinions out there you are asking and waiting to be judged. As much as don't like you I really can't hate you. I can only feel sorry for you. It has got to be hard not knowing where you fit in, in this life. I can only imagine the sad life you must be living. I only say so because you feel the need to speak hurtfully about people and children that you know absolutely nothing about. It takes a small person to speak in no or half truths. A real woman would find out everything there is to know before they open their mouths and well…insert foot. You can go on blogging in the delusional world you are living in and continue to try to hurt the others, known/unknown to you, by misrepresenting them. People that know me, us, and the situation I'm sure can and will draw their own conclusions. Thanks for letting me share the REALITY of all this to you.
Posted by _____ on Thursday, May 08, 2008 - 1:56 PM
On this My Space page Princess also mentions names of several people that live in DeKalb, welfare fraud, tax fraud, and how she loves to paint using her own shit.
It is obvious by this above post and by the URL that Princess already knew that her relatives knew where she was and what name she was using before Murt even was in the picture. If Princess didn’t want people to find her then WHY did she even start a My Space or Beaconhell? Was this all done so she could make people feel sorry for her? Did she start stalking Murt because her original plan backfired or is all of this drama just so she can draw attention to herself and her Beaconhell Blog?
In doing my research on both Princess and Murt, I have found there is no proof to Princess’s claims that Murt posted any info on the net about her. If there was it would of showed up under the searches I did on both of them. There is no proof that Murt is stalking Princess or that would of shown up too. There is proof that Princess is the one that is doing the stalking of Murt by using certain names that she has made up. One of those names is Zan aka Zanlaughsatyou aka Mistress. I find it kind of strange that Zan has no friends and that most of her followers on Twitter are actually spam sites or people that think she is a real person. In my research of Zan there isn’t much on the internet. What there is seems to link Zan to Beaconhell. On most sites her only friend is Beaconhell. Zan is actually Princess’s alter ego that happens to do all the posting on how Murt has done things to poor little Princess.
On Beaconhell, Zan and Princess tells people how they shouldn’t post on Murt’s websites or blogs. The reason is because Poor Princess has told her people how Murt will get mad and then he will post more threats to Princess.These people are so afraid that if they even read Murt’s blog that she will actually be in danger! Princess has never shown anything to them to prove this. The only thing Princess has posted on the internet that has anything to do with Murt is by people that used to be on his chat site, or people who were mad at him when he used to do his broadcasts. Princess doesn’t want any of the people on Beacon hell (except the few people that are in on this game she is playing)to post anything or read his blog because she doesn’t want them to know that she is not being stalked by Murt. Actually I wouldn’t be surprised that Murt isn’t her sending her emails telling her that if she doesn’t stop all of her threats against him he will take her to court. Is Princess really afraid that Murt might follow through and press charges of cyber stalking? Or is Princess afraid that someone might tell Murt what Princess is up to?
It seems to me that Princess seems to have a past of stalking and threatening people. . To Princess this is nothing but some type of game where she seems to enjoy hurting anyone that stands up to her or is weaker than her. She will attack anyone even innocent children just as long as she has people that believe Her little story and they feel sorry for her. It is sad tht an innocent person’s reputation is being destroyed by her posting these lies on the internet. She even goes as far as using a certain search site to search info on her enemies which will be the next thing that she has done that I will exposed.
Maybe Princess should contact some producer and have her little story put on TV. After all, It sounds like another Soap Opera to me.
NOT SO FAST MS PRINCESS
As long as we are persuing the TRUTH here, it is time to the fans of the almighty princess to face up to one TRUTH that seems to have eluded everyone here for over a year.
That simple truth is I AM NOT THE ONE WHO REVEALED WHAT PRINCESS'S SURNAME WAS. THE PERSON WHO REVEALED PRINCESS'S NAME TO THE WORLD WAS, IN FACT, PRINCESS.
I am curious why the loyalists of this piece of work have not gleaned this fact by now. Or is it that if they realized that she is the one who put her name out there and not me, that her house of cards would come falling down and she would be exposed for the fraud she is.
She did this two ways. The first way was (drum roll) BEACONHELL.COM!
This obvious little fact was pointed out me over a year ago when I first found out the blog existed.
She did so, at first through a series of articles regarding the famous IRS WHISTLEBLOWER CASE.
Let us look at the clues here:
She mentions DeKalb County Illinois. A rather sparsely populated largely agricultural county in the Northeastern part of the state.
She starts her blog out with articles ABOUT HER FAMILY, cousins, aunts, uncles, etc.
She mentions specific incidents regarding nephews, claims of racism,zoning disputes and so forth.
She writes an article where she details her being a power of attorney for a convicted felon, publishing a letter written to a person who owed her "friend" money for a suburban that was sold.
Let us now look at the epic story of those she involved in the IRS case and why I have always felt this fact was so important in my ongoing debates over Princess and her stupid claims of stalking.
She mentions:
Midwest Tree service
DTree Landscaping (or similar name)
Her occupation or reference of some sort as being a claims photographer for one of the landscaping firms in regards to tree damage, one could conclude.
A local Fire Department
A Local Hospital
An incident entitled (the tree tard incident) with one of her odd altered photos showing a sheriff's car a halloween figgure and a white pick up truck with DTree written on the side door.
A close up photo of a Pick Up Truck door with the name of the firm and the telephone number of same.
Another incident involving a tow truck where she tried to get the driver arrested (so the rumor goes) for attempting to run her over with it.
The first names of just about everyone in DeKalb County Illinois (and later Sycamore, Ill) she was involved with.
And of course there are all those KEYWORDS that are throughout her blog. The keywords themselves give names of people places and businesses that make it easy for anyone who wants to, to research them.
With all of these clues, any 3rd grader could do basic research USING PUBLIC RECORDS to find out who she is.
Now, her own blogs were not our only clues here. I have said over and over again that the issue with Princess goes back to BEFORE she started Beaconhell.com. This is how it does, in part. She used to post all over
WEBSLEUTHS.COM before she was BANNED FROM THERE.
This is why she has been going after Websleuths.com on her blog. She cannot take no for an answer.
I do not have access to Websleuths.com, but I have been told and those with access should be able to track this information down, that Princess used to post there under the username of Jaded or something similar.
She gave the same set of clues, according to anon information, in Websleuths and other message forums that would allow anyone with the least amount of effort to find our her actual id.
Her, vandetta against me was due, SOLELY TO HER MISTAKEN BELIEF THAT MY NEW ALLIANCE WITH WEBSLEUTHS INCLUDED BEING GIVEN HER SURNAME.
SHE AND OTHERS ALSO WERE ANGRY THAT I DID, IN FACT, ALLOW WEBSLEUTHS.COM TO HAVE A PROMINENT ROLL IN MY BROADCASTS. THESE WERE THE SO CALLED "GANG OF THE BANNED" WHO FELT THEY WERE UNJUSTLY BANNED FROM USLEUTH BY WHO THEY FELT WAS AN OVERLY STRICT OWNER AND ADMINISTRATORS.
LEST WE FORGET THIS LITTLE LINK:
http://twitter.com/PrincessBH
AGAIN IT IS THE ALMIGHTY PRINCESS WHO POSTS THESE NAMES AND NOT ME. THIS MEANS ALL OF HER CLAIMS OF STALKING AND SO ON HAS BEEN A SERIES OF LIES YET NOBODY HOLDS HER ACCOUNTABLE. HOW STRANGE.
If you were to make a TIMELINE of the events that have transpired since late August of 2008 and compare them with the actions Princess and the people I label "the hackers" there would be some real interesting "coincidences."
I leave that for those who ACTUALLY want to know the TRUTH to sort out.
For now, let us concentrate on the illustrious Ms. Princess and the topic at at hand.
The second and shortest example of how MS PRINCESS gave out her name on BEACONHELL.COM was a post of her AUTOBIOGRAPHY. She put the post up for all to see (IT WAS PUBLIC BACK THEN) stating her surname, her "author" name and WHO she thought gave out her real name. GUESS WHAT??? IT WAS NOT ME!!
If she has not DELETE the post, I suggest those of you WHO HAVE ACCESS go read it. Note the date of the post.
I am suprised that with that post being in existance FOR OVER A YEAR that nobody has ever even mentioned it, except the anons who have constantly reminded me of it for the last year or so.
FOR THE RECORD. I WAS SUPPLIED HER REAL NAME BY BEING SENT THIS SAME POST BY A NUMBER OF ANONS AND ONE PERSON WHO DID SEND ME HER NAME WHO WAS OBVIOUSLY FROM WHERE SHE USED TO LIVE. I NEVER FOUND OUT WHO THAT PERSON WAS OTHER THAN IT WAS LIKELY SOMEONE OTHER THAN "AUNT CRAZY."
Now by using simple logic, which a lot of people seem incapable of, it is clear that it would be easy to find out a lot of biological information about someone who created quite a stir in DeKalb County, Illinois, who mentioned event after event having to do with that area giving out all kinds o details and names of those tied to those events to give even the most amateur detective the resources to find out all they wanted to know about the illustrious Princess and her adventures in DeKalb county Illionis.
Perhaps NOW, dear reader, you will understand why Princess made those posts "members only."
Just one slight problem: THE POSTS WERE PUBLIC LONG ENOUGH FOR THOSE INTERESTED TO ARCHIVE THEM.
Is it not logical then that SOME OF THESE PEOPLE might not be happy with the content of these posts.
I have said time after time that I AM NOT THE ONE SHE SHOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT.
Her concerns lie with THOSE IN THE PAST THAT SHE HAS GIVEN REASON TO BE ANGRY WITH HER.
I do not know who these people are since they did not give me their names. I do know that they are not pleased with Princess for something she did to them in the past. They are thankful to me because it is my continued battle with Princess that gave them the tools necessary to infiltrate her areas and await the opportunity to let her know how they feel about her treatment about them.
One of these individuals is one of her"trusted friends" and is about to show her how trusted a friend this person is.
Remember the old adage,"Keep your friends close and your enemies closer?"
Princess should have taken the clue I gave her a long time ago.
Now it is too late.
Stay Tuned.
MURT
That simple truth is I AM NOT THE ONE WHO REVEALED WHAT PRINCESS'S SURNAME WAS. THE PERSON WHO REVEALED PRINCESS'S NAME TO THE WORLD WAS, IN FACT, PRINCESS.
I am curious why the loyalists of this piece of work have not gleaned this fact by now. Or is it that if they realized that she is the one who put her name out there and not me, that her house of cards would come falling down and she would be exposed for the fraud she is.
She did this two ways. The first way was (drum roll) BEACONHELL.COM!
This obvious little fact was pointed out me over a year ago when I first found out the blog existed.
She did so, at first through a series of articles regarding the famous IRS WHISTLEBLOWER CASE.
Let us look at the clues here:
She mentions DeKalb County Illinois. A rather sparsely populated largely agricultural county in the Northeastern part of the state.
She starts her blog out with articles ABOUT HER FAMILY, cousins, aunts, uncles, etc.
She mentions specific incidents regarding nephews, claims of racism,zoning disputes and so forth.
She writes an article where she details her being a power of attorney for a convicted felon, publishing a letter written to a person who owed her "friend" money for a suburban that was sold.
Let us now look at the epic story of those she involved in the IRS case and why I have always felt this fact was so important in my ongoing debates over Princess and her stupid claims of stalking.
She mentions:
Midwest Tree service
DTree Landscaping (or similar name)
Her occupation or reference of some sort as being a claims photographer for one of the landscaping firms in regards to tree damage, one could conclude.
A local Fire Department
A Local Hospital
An incident entitled (the tree tard incident) with one of her odd altered photos showing a sheriff's car a halloween figgure and a white pick up truck with DTree written on the side door.
A close up photo of a Pick Up Truck door with the name of the firm and the telephone number of same.
Another incident involving a tow truck where she tried to get the driver arrested (so the rumor goes) for attempting to run her over with it.
The first names of just about everyone in DeKalb County Illinois (and later Sycamore, Ill) she was involved with.
And of course there are all those KEYWORDS that are throughout her blog. The keywords themselves give names of people places and businesses that make it easy for anyone who wants to, to research them.
With all of these clues, any 3rd grader could do basic research USING PUBLIC RECORDS to find out who she is.
Now, her own blogs were not our only clues here. I have said over and over again that the issue with Princess goes back to BEFORE she started Beaconhell.com. This is how it does, in part. She used to post all over
WEBSLEUTHS.COM before she was BANNED FROM THERE.
This is why she has been going after Websleuths.com on her blog. She cannot take no for an answer.
I do not have access to Websleuths.com, but I have been told and those with access should be able to track this information down, that Princess used to post there under the username of Jaded or something similar.
She gave the same set of clues, according to anon information, in Websleuths and other message forums that would allow anyone with the least amount of effort to find our her actual id.
Her, vandetta against me was due, SOLELY TO HER MISTAKEN BELIEF THAT MY NEW ALLIANCE WITH WEBSLEUTHS INCLUDED BEING GIVEN HER SURNAME.
SHE AND OTHERS ALSO WERE ANGRY THAT I DID, IN FACT, ALLOW WEBSLEUTHS.COM TO HAVE A PROMINENT ROLL IN MY BROADCASTS. THESE WERE THE SO CALLED "GANG OF THE BANNED" WHO FELT THEY WERE UNJUSTLY BANNED FROM USLEUTH BY WHO THEY FELT WAS AN OVERLY STRICT OWNER AND ADMINISTRATORS.
LEST WE FORGET THIS LITTLE LINK:
http://twitter.com/PrincessBH
AGAIN IT IS THE ALMIGHTY PRINCESS WHO POSTS THESE NAMES AND NOT ME. THIS MEANS ALL OF HER CLAIMS OF STALKING AND SO ON HAS BEEN A SERIES OF LIES YET NOBODY HOLDS HER ACCOUNTABLE. HOW STRANGE.
If you were to make a TIMELINE of the events that have transpired since late August of 2008 and compare them with the actions Princess and the people I label "the hackers" there would be some real interesting "coincidences."
I leave that for those who ACTUALLY want to know the TRUTH to sort out.
For now, let us concentrate on the illustrious Ms. Princess and the topic at at hand.
The second and shortest example of how MS PRINCESS gave out her name on BEACONHELL.COM was a post of her AUTOBIOGRAPHY. She put the post up for all to see (IT WAS PUBLIC BACK THEN) stating her surname, her "author" name and WHO she thought gave out her real name. GUESS WHAT??? IT WAS NOT ME!!
If she has not DELETE the post, I suggest those of you WHO HAVE ACCESS go read it. Note the date of the post.
I am suprised that with that post being in existance FOR OVER A YEAR that nobody has ever even mentioned it, except the anons who have constantly reminded me of it for the last year or so.
FOR THE RECORD. I WAS SUPPLIED HER REAL NAME BY BEING SENT THIS SAME POST BY A NUMBER OF ANONS AND ONE PERSON WHO DID SEND ME HER NAME WHO WAS OBVIOUSLY FROM WHERE SHE USED TO LIVE. I NEVER FOUND OUT WHO THAT PERSON WAS OTHER THAN IT WAS LIKELY SOMEONE OTHER THAN "AUNT CRAZY."
Now by using simple logic, which a lot of people seem incapable of, it is clear that it would be easy to find out a lot of biological information about someone who created quite a stir in DeKalb County, Illinois, who mentioned event after event having to do with that area giving out all kinds o details and names of those tied to those events to give even the most amateur detective the resources to find out all they wanted to know about the illustrious Princess and her adventures in DeKalb county Illionis.
Perhaps NOW, dear reader, you will understand why Princess made those posts "members only."
Just one slight problem: THE POSTS WERE PUBLIC LONG ENOUGH FOR THOSE INTERESTED TO ARCHIVE THEM.
Is it not logical then that SOME OF THESE PEOPLE might not be happy with the content of these posts.
I have said time after time that I AM NOT THE ONE SHE SHOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT.
Her concerns lie with THOSE IN THE PAST THAT SHE HAS GIVEN REASON TO BE ANGRY WITH HER.
I do not know who these people are since they did not give me their names. I do know that they are not pleased with Princess for something she did to them in the past. They are thankful to me because it is my continued battle with Princess that gave them the tools necessary to infiltrate her areas and await the opportunity to let her know how they feel about her treatment about them.
One of these individuals is one of her"trusted friends" and is about to show her how trusted a friend this person is.
Remember the old adage,"Keep your friends close and your enemies closer?"
Princess should have taken the clue I gave her a long time ago.
Now it is too late.
Stay Tuned.
MURT
Saturday, October 17, 2009
BEATING A BROKEN MAN WHEN HE IS DOWN AND OUT
I just do not get it with you people. You won and won big. I have not had the van out in months. I have not been on scene at any missing child case for months, all I do is stream trial coverage on occasion and run a chat with 5 people.
I have stopped talking about the Princess tyrant and even about Ms. Mckee except for a minor point regarding ip address and the use of sitemap software.
My most trusted admin from Paltalk pummeled me on Twitter and in my own chat as well as on a Radio blog show, thus assuring that I am done.
In spite of all of that, the same anon commenters insist with visiting this board as if I had 4000 people visiting and I have a vast internet presence.
They say I am a nothing and not important yet they keep up as if I am something special and am important.
With all of this these people simply cannot leave me alone and move on.
There is more going on here than meets the eye and the actions of these people prove it.
Let it go folks, I am beat. Go do something important like watching your soap operas.
Or....is it that you are NOTHING without me?
Actions do speak louder than words.
MURTWITNESSONE
I have stopped talking about the Princess tyrant and even about Ms. Mckee except for a minor point regarding ip address and the use of sitemap software.
My most trusted admin from Paltalk pummeled me on Twitter and in my own chat as well as on a Radio blog show, thus assuring that I am done.
In spite of all of that, the same anon commenters insist with visiting this board as if I had 4000 people visiting and I have a vast internet presence.
They say I am a nothing and not important yet they keep up as if I am something special and am important.
With all of this these people simply cannot leave me alone and move on.
There is more going on here than meets the eye and the actions of these people prove it.
Let it go folks, I am beat. Go do something important like watching your soap operas.
Or....is it that you are NOTHING without me?
Actions do speak louder than words.
MURTWITNESSONE
Thursday, October 15, 2009
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
WHEN I WROTE THE TWO PROCEEDING ARTICLES, I HAD THE MISTAKEN IMPRESSION THAT I WAS ENGAGING IN A DEBATE WITH AN ADULT.
I SEE THAT I HAVE BEEN GREATLY MISTAKEN.
IN ORDER TO AVOID ANY MORE OF HER TEMPER TANTRUMS AND HER PEEING ALL OVER THE FLOOR, I WILL CHOOSE, FOR THE MOMENT, TO IGNORE THIS CRYBABY AND MOVE ON TO MORE CONSTRUCTIVE PROJECTS.
OFF TO FARM TOWN.
MURT
I SEE THAT I HAVE BEEN GREATLY MISTAKEN.
IN ORDER TO AVOID ANY MORE OF HER TEMPER TANTRUMS AND HER PEEING ALL OVER THE FLOOR, I WILL CHOOSE, FOR THE MOMENT, TO IGNORE THIS CRYBABY AND MOVE ON TO MORE CONSTRUCTIVE PROJECTS.
OFF TO FARM TOWN.
MURT
A HELL OF A WAY TO SELL A BOOK, PART 2
THE EDITOR OF IN COLD BLOG WENT ON A TWITTER RANT SCREAMING THE IP ADDRESS OF ANYONE'S COMPUTER IS NOT PRIVATE AND SO ON AND SO ON, SHE THEN DENIES MY CONTENTION THAT SHE DID NOT SEE THE SOFTWARE ON KARISUEBEE'S COMPUTER.
I SUGGEST THEN, THAT MS. MCKEE EXPLAIN THESE COMMENTS:
So, let's see... KariTunaTwat is on Microsoft WinXP, Java is disabled. Damn, Tuna, why are U still using Internet Explorer 8.0?12:53 AM Oct 14th from web
FOLLOWED BY THIS ONE:
What else do I see w/Tuna & her comp? Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; FunWebProducts12:54 AM Oct 14th from web
A NOTE HERE, MCKEE MADE AN INTERESTING COMMENT IN HER TWITTER LATER ON:
@Murtwitnessone if you are gong to accuse me of being able to get inside someone's computer you better be able to prove it! That is
FOLLOWED BY THIS ONE:
@Murtwitnessone I have never "gotten inside" anyone's computer NOR have I ever hacked a single computer in my entire life!
NOW I DRAW YOUR ATTENTION BACK TO THE TWITTERS ABOVE, NOTABLY THE ONE THAT STARTS WITH:
What else do I see w/Tuna & her comp?
WHERE IS THIS INFORMATION LOCATED? MARS? IT WOULD APPEAR TO ME THAT SOMEHOW MS. MCKEE IS ABLE TO TELL QUITE A BIT ABOUT KARISUEBEE'S COMPUTER AS WELL AS THAT OF ANYONE WHO CHECKS INTO IN COLD BLOG.
I DID NOT MENTION HACKING. I DID SAY THAT MS MCKEE WAS ABLE TO SEE QUITE A BIT ABOUT SOMEONE'S COMPUTER BESIDES JUST WHO THE ISP IS.
SHE REITERATES THE INFORMATION ABOUT IP'S ARE NOT PRIVATE.
PERHAPS, BUT I AGAIN DIRECT YOU ALL TO THIS LINK AND REMEMBER WHAT HAS BEEN POSTED ON MS. MCKEE'S TWITTERS ON THIS SUBJECT:
http://www.articlesbase.com/security-articles/why-should-i-hide-my-ip-address-501789.html
HER DENIAL ACTUALLY PROVES MY POINT:
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2434x3b&s=4
SOMETHING USED BY IN COLD BLOG, IN THIS CASE SITEMETER IS ABLE TO GIVE NOT ONLY THE IP ADDRESS BUT QUITE A BIT OF INFORMATION THAT IS INSIDE HER COMPUTER. IF MS. MCKEE WOULD BOTHER TO READ THE ABOVE ARTICLE, SHE WOULD UNDERSTAND I WAS TALKING ABOUT THE HIGHLY DETAILED INFORMATION THAT IS BEING GATHERED AND NOT ACCUSING HER OF ANYTHING UNLAWFUL. JEEZ I WISH PEOPLE WOULD LEARN HOW TO READ!!!
IF ALL OF YOU OUT THERE ARE COMFORTABLE ALLOWING THIS KIND OF DETAILED INFORMATION BEING KNOWN BY IN COLD BLOG, THEN BE MY GUEST.
PS: SINCE WHEN ARE TWITTER POSTS COPYRIGHTED?
ALSO THERE IS SUCH A THING AS "FAIR USE." ODD HOW WE SEEM TO FORGET THAT.
MURT
I SUGGEST THEN, THAT MS. MCKEE EXPLAIN THESE COMMENTS:
So, let's see... KariTunaTwat is on Microsoft WinXP, Java is disabled. Damn, Tuna, why are U still using Internet Explorer 8.0?12:53 AM Oct 14th from web
FOLLOWED BY THIS ONE:
What else do I see w/Tuna & her comp? Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; FunWebProducts12:54 AM Oct 14th from web
A NOTE HERE, MCKEE MADE AN INTERESTING COMMENT IN HER TWITTER LATER ON:
@Murtwitnessone if you are gong to accuse me of being able to get inside someone's computer you better be able to prove it! That is
FOLLOWED BY THIS ONE:
@Murtwitnessone I have never "gotten inside" anyone's computer NOR have I ever hacked a single computer in my entire life!
NOW I DRAW YOUR ATTENTION BACK TO THE TWITTERS ABOVE, NOTABLY THE ONE THAT STARTS WITH:
What else do I see w/Tuna & her comp?
WHERE IS THIS INFORMATION LOCATED? MARS? IT WOULD APPEAR TO ME THAT SOMEHOW MS. MCKEE IS ABLE TO TELL QUITE A BIT ABOUT KARISUEBEE'S COMPUTER AS WELL AS THAT OF ANYONE WHO CHECKS INTO IN COLD BLOG.
I DID NOT MENTION HACKING. I DID SAY THAT MS MCKEE WAS ABLE TO SEE QUITE A BIT ABOUT SOMEONE'S COMPUTER BESIDES JUST WHO THE ISP IS.
SHE REITERATES THE INFORMATION ABOUT IP'S ARE NOT PRIVATE.
PERHAPS, BUT I AGAIN DIRECT YOU ALL TO THIS LINK AND REMEMBER WHAT HAS BEEN POSTED ON MS. MCKEE'S TWITTERS ON THIS SUBJECT:
http://www.articlesbase.com/security-articles/why-should-i-hide-my-ip-address-501789.html
HER DENIAL ACTUALLY PROVES MY POINT:
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2434x3b&s=4
SOMETHING USED BY IN COLD BLOG, IN THIS CASE SITEMETER IS ABLE TO GIVE NOT ONLY THE IP ADDRESS BUT QUITE A BIT OF INFORMATION THAT IS INSIDE HER COMPUTER. IF MS. MCKEE WOULD BOTHER TO READ THE ABOVE ARTICLE, SHE WOULD UNDERSTAND I WAS TALKING ABOUT THE HIGHLY DETAILED INFORMATION THAT IS BEING GATHERED AND NOT ACCUSING HER OF ANYTHING UNLAWFUL. JEEZ I WISH PEOPLE WOULD LEARN HOW TO READ!!!
IF ALL OF YOU OUT THERE ARE COMFORTABLE ALLOWING THIS KIND OF DETAILED INFORMATION BEING KNOWN BY IN COLD BLOG, THEN BE MY GUEST.
PS: SINCE WHEN ARE TWITTER POSTS COPYRIGHTED?
ALSO THERE IS SUCH A THING AS "FAIR USE." ODD HOW WE SEEM TO FORGET THAT.
MURT
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
WHAT A HELL OF A WAY TO SELL A BOOK!
One of the oddest things to come out of the battle of the blogs of late was a series of posts on twitter regarding the visit to In Cold Blog by the owner of a small chat site over at Paltalk.com.
For those not familar with ICB. It is a blog supposedly set up to showcase the works of guest true crime authors and for the blog owner and select authors to advertise and hopefully sell their books.
The editor of this blog, owned by Cory Mitchell, a prominent true crime blog, has been of late, posting some rather disconcerting twitters regarding her visit, apparently disapproving of her visit. The editor of In Cold Blog even went so far as to publish for all to see, the IP address of the person in question.
To understand the significance of that inconchinable act, I suggest you read the article in the following link:
http://www.articlesbase.com/security-articles/why-should-i-hide-my-ip-address-501789.html
I doubt that my suggestion in this small blog, that people be wary of visiting ICB due to the act of the editor publishing what is considered to be private information.
I do remind persons on BOTH sides of the blog wars of the normal disclaimer that is given to visitors of websites and blogs when it comes to ip address and log in information:
This is an example of a privacy assurance by a prominent chat service:
http://www.paltalk.com/privacy.shtml
To the best of my knowledge, In Cold Blog HAS NO PRIVACY ASSURANCE STATEMENT.
BE ADVISED ACCORDINGLY
MURTWITNESSONE
For those not familar with ICB. It is a blog supposedly set up to showcase the works of guest true crime authors and for the blog owner and select authors to advertise and hopefully sell their books.
The editor of this blog, owned by Cory Mitchell, a prominent true crime blog, has been of late, posting some rather disconcerting twitters regarding her visit, apparently disapproving of her visit. The editor of In Cold Blog even went so far as to publish for all to see, the IP address of the person in question.
To understand the significance of that inconchinable act, I suggest you read the article in the following link:
http://www.articlesbase.com/security-articles/why-should-i-hide-my-ip-address-501789.html
I doubt that my suggestion in this small blog, that people be wary of visiting ICB due to the act of the editor publishing what is considered to be private information.
I do remind persons on BOTH sides of the blog wars of the normal disclaimer that is given to visitors of websites and blogs when it comes to ip address and log in information:
This is an example of a privacy assurance by a prominent chat service:
http://www.paltalk.com/privacy.shtml
To the best of my knowledge, In Cold Blog HAS NO PRIVACY ASSURANCE STATEMENT.
BE ADVISED ACCORDINGLY
MURTWITNESSONE
Monday, October 12, 2009
CONFESSIONS OF A FELONY BY CRIMINALINJUSTICE
BEACONHELL AND SUPPORTERS FINALLY ADMIT COMPUTER CRIME OF THEFT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY:
CrimInjust @beaconhell If only he knew i watching him write that newest blog a few moments ago from inside his own computer LMFAO . Deja Vu? Jacked
SLIGHT PROBLEM MISS CRIMINALINJUST. YOU HAVE A TRACK RECORD OF DOING JUST THAT. YOU FORGET ABOUT MONOXIDE411? YOUR ASSOCIATION WITH MONOXIDE? THE MANIA FOLKS, SHORT BUS????
SORRY, THAT DOG DON'T HUNT. YOU HAVE BEEN BUSTED MANY TIMES OVER.
HERE'S TO YA:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKynrRITjEY
CrimInjust @beaconhell If only he knew i watching him write that newest blog a few moments ago from inside his own computer LMFAO . Deja Vu? Jacked
- @Tards_United Still digging in root files. He has so much shit buried on his Hard drive its amazing. I'll ship files to forum when done22 minutes ago from web in reply to Tards_United
- @Michelle_McKee Checked root files theres a goldmine of pms. I'll switch up BIOS settings so he can't reboot that should keep him busy
- @Michelle_McKee Just sent you that packet off his comp. Doesn't look like much at first but read the third file. Methinks hes gonna shit
- @beaconhell If only he knew i watching him write that newest blog a few moments ago from inside his own computer LMFAO . Deja Vu? Jacked
- STAY TUNED FOR UPDATES AS CRIMINALINJUSTICE CONTINUES TO CONFESS TO HER CRIMES.
- FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT KNOW CRIMINALINJUSTICE, SHE HAS A HISTORY IF THIS KIND OF BIZZARE BEHAVIOR
- http://ripoffreport.com/Bekki-Sowerby-CriminalInjustice-Justice/Non-Profit-Charities/Bekki-Sowerby-CriminalInjusti-SBD88.htm
- http://www.topix.com/forum/city/michigan-nd/TE2PVHRLML92UQBP8/p5
- SHE SEEMS ALMOST AS POPULAR AS I AM. THERE IS A LOT MORE ABOUT HER OUT THERE. GOOGLE IS YOUR FRIEND, ENJOY
- RETREAT RETREAT RETREAT!!!!
- " WHOOPS!!!" SAYS BECCA AKA CRIMINALINJUST...".I WAS ONLY KIDDING!!!!"
SLIGHT PROBLEM MISS CRIMINALINJUST. YOU HAVE A TRACK RECORD OF DOING JUST THAT. YOU FORGET ABOUT MONOXIDE411? YOUR ASSOCIATION WITH MONOXIDE? THE MANIA FOLKS, SHORT BUS????
SORRY, THAT DOG DON'T HUNT. YOU HAVE BEEN BUSTED MANY TIMES OVER.
HERE'S TO YA:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKynrRITjEY
- MURTWITNESSONE
BEACONHELL CONTINUES WITH CLOAK CLAIMS
AN ANON COMMENT WAS LEFT THAT CLAIMS THAT THE CLOAKER IS A HOAX? DOES THAT MEAN THAT BEACONHELL IS A LIAR???????????OH NOOOOOOOOOOO!
BUT THEN THERE ARE THESE RECENT TWITTERS
http://twitter.com/Tards_United
EPIL FAIL On the Blog Dirty Murty Nice try though LOL CLOAK ON! Streaming feed to Cloak Forum9 minutes ago from TweetDeck
Grid 9 is up and running Streaming feeds to Cloak forum
Cloak also working at the INN
Hooked into all chat programs and emails! Check out Grid 9!! SWEEEEEETTTTTTTTTT!!!!
Cloaking Code: 907 is working
MOnitoring DDI too
http://twitter.com/Feistyoldbroad (PALTALK SUBSCRIBER)
cloak 43 via Grid 9
Just got the cloak ty Princess!
sending Princess my check (RACKETEERING?)
Cloaker 98 full action!
ANOTHER PALTALK SUBSCRIBER:
Midnite02 @DONEWITHMUTT It's all in the Cloaker Room now. Left side tomorrow night. about 1 hour ago from web
IF CLOAKER IS A HOAX AS BEACONHELL.COM CLAIMS THAN HER SUPPORTERS CAN TRY AND EXPLAIN THIS LINK?
http://www.soft-go.com/view/Identity-Cloaker_65086.html
SEEMS REAL ENOUGH TO ME.
THE FACT REMAINS THAT AS THESE CLAIMS CIRCULATE AROUND THE INTERNET,NOT EVERYONE IS GOING TO LOOK AT THE CLAIMS AS A HOAX AND WILL DECIDE NOT TO SUBSCRIBE TO PALTALK.COM AS A RESULT.
MURTWITNESSONE
BUT THEN THERE ARE THESE RECENT TWITTERS
http://twitter.com/Tards_United
EPIL FAIL On the Blog Dirty Murty Nice try though LOL CLOAK ON! Streaming feed to Cloak Forum9 minutes ago from TweetDeck
Grid 9 is up and running Streaming feeds to Cloak forum
Cloak also working at the INN
Hooked into all chat programs and emails! Check out Grid 9!! SWEEEEEETTTTTTTTTT!!!!
Cloaking Code: 907 is working
MOnitoring DDI too
http://twitter.com/Feistyoldbroad (PALTALK SUBSCRIBER)
cloak 43 via Grid 9
Just got the cloak ty Princess!
sending Princess my check (RACKETEERING?)
Cloaker 98 full action!
ANOTHER PALTALK SUBSCRIBER:
Midnite02 @DONEWITHMUTT It's all in the Cloaker Room now. Left side tomorrow night. about 1 hour ago from web
IF CLOAKER IS A HOAX AS BEACONHELL.COM CLAIMS THAN HER SUPPORTERS CAN TRY AND EXPLAIN THIS LINK?
http://www.soft-go.com/view/Identity-Cloaker_65086.html
SEEMS REAL ENOUGH TO ME.
THE FACT REMAINS THAT AS THESE CLAIMS CIRCULATE AROUND THE INTERNET,NOT EVERYONE IS GOING TO LOOK AT THE CLAIMS AS A HOAX AND WILL DECIDE NOT TO SUBSCRIBE TO PALTALK.COM AS A RESULT.
MURTWITNESSONE
FROM GUEST AUTHOR.......BEACONHELL EXPOSE'
THE FOLLOWING WAS SUBMITTED BY A GUEST AUTHOR BY REQUEST:
THE CONTENTS OF THE ARTICLE ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE AUTHOR. THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THE ARTICLE ARE SOLELY THOSE OF THE AUTHOR AND NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF THIS BLOG OR THE BLOG OWNER.
THE AUTHOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTENT OF THE ARTICLE.
....................................................................................................................................................................
SHIT
By Stop Beaconhell
I read recently a twitter sent by Princess saying she never was in a Witness Protection Program. Well If I got it wrong maybe it is because of all the different stories she has told on the internet about a certain Tax Case.
Princess claims that Murt put her life in danger because he supposedly contacted her relatives. She goes on to say that she is in hiding because she blew the whistle on her relatives for not paying taxes and they threatened her life. She told people that Murt contacted them and now they will know where she lives and the name she is using.
If Princess is truly HIDING from some one why is she even posting on the internet about these people and what they have done. Does she really think they are not going to find out. Maybe Princess is really running from the mess she left behind when she left DeKalb.
Could Princess be hiding from a former landlord? I recently found a post where Princess was going to be moving out of a certain residence and it looked like the owner was going to have her evicted. Princess decided that before she moves she would redecorate the place and possibly give it a new paint job. Princess decides she is going to paint the place by using her own shit. Yes readers, I am talking about Princess using her own feces to paint the walls of the place she is moving out of. Here is a copy of post that Princess had posted on the internet . I did edit out the Name of a person she had mentioned that owns this property and some of the content not related to what she did but it is word for word of what she posted:
I am counting down days until July 27th, ________________will have nothing on me when my art work is finished here. To bad my newly diagnosed Tourette's Syndrome has given me this crazy fascination for fecal art. And not necessarily my own either! The damn narcotics have left me impacted - that will leave me plenty for my mural.
P.P.S. Can the disabled be evicted? *smirk*
Posted by beaconhell.com on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 6:51 PM
Now anyone that would go as far as taking their own shit and spreading it on the walls on someone else’s property just because they are mad at that person is a SICK individual. Most normal people that are mad at their landlord would normally leave garbage around or not clean the place up when they left. I know I wouldn’t want to be the person who had to clean Princess’s SHIT off of those walls. But unfortunately someone had to do it.
Princess doesn’t seem to realize that the things she does out of her anger affect people that have nothing to do with whoever caused her to be pissed off.
I don’t know if Princess really has Tourette’s Syndrome or not but If she does her illness
is not an excuse to treat people like that. If she is disabled , Why is she harassing and making fun of certain people on Murt’s blog who have a disability? Why does she feel she is better than they are.? Does she think by mentioning she has a disability that people are not going to blame her for her actions?
If she isn’t disabled then I think It is horrible of her to pretend she is so people will excuse her for her behavior.
Princess has made fun of Murt picking his boogers and picking his butt, But Princess has a bad habit herself. Princess PLAYS with her SHIT!!! Maybe people should post this all around the internet and put it on twitter to send to the whole world. I bet Poor little Princess won’t like it a bit. Am I right Princess. !!!! I would normally post were I found this info but I know that Princess loves to delete things off of the internet if it makes her look bad. That ok Princess, I made a copy of your posts.
I am going to use the words that Princess herself put on a post :
Stay tuned, more of your dirty laundry is going to be hanging out for the world to see what a creep you really are.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: THE INCIDENT REGARDING THE VANDALISM OF THE APARTMENT CAME FROM SEVERAL SOURCES OTHER THAN THE GUEST AUTHOR.
PRINCESS USES THE TERM "BOOGER EATER" TO DESCRIBE EVERYONE SHE HAS AN AGENDA AGAINST. IT IS MOST LIKELY THAT IT IS SHE THAT EATS HER OWN BOOGERS, PROBABLY ON THAT SHIT SHE IS ALLEGED TO PLAY WITH.
MURTWITNESSONE
THE CONTENTS OF THE ARTICLE ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE AUTHOR. THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THE ARTICLE ARE SOLELY THOSE OF THE AUTHOR AND NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF THIS BLOG OR THE BLOG OWNER.
THE AUTHOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTENT OF THE ARTICLE.
....................................................................................................................................................................
SHIT
By Stop Beaconhell
I read recently a twitter sent by Princess saying she never was in a Witness Protection Program. Well If I got it wrong maybe it is because of all the different stories she has told on the internet about a certain Tax Case.
Princess claims that Murt put her life in danger because he supposedly contacted her relatives. She goes on to say that she is in hiding because she blew the whistle on her relatives for not paying taxes and they threatened her life. She told people that Murt contacted them and now they will know where she lives and the name she is using.
If Princess is truly HIDING from some one why is she even posting on the internet about these people and what they have done. Does she really think they are not going to find out. Maybe Princess is really running from the mess she left behind when she left DeKalb.
Could Princess be hiding from a former landlord? I recently found a post where Princess was going to be moving out of a certain residence and it looked like the owner was going to have her evicted. Princess decided that before she moves she would redecorate the place and possibly give it a new paint job. Princess decides she is going to paint the place by using her own shit. Yes readers, I am talking about Princess using her own feces to paint the walls of the place she is moving out of. Here is a copy of post that Princess had posted on the internet . I did edit out the Name of a person she had mentioned that owns this property and some of the content not related to what she did but it is word for word of what she posted:
I am counting down days until July 27th, ________________will have nothing on me when my art work is finished here. To bad my newly diagnosed Tourette's Syndrome has given me this crazy fascination for fecal art. And not necessarily my own either! The damn narcotics have left me impacted - that will leave me plenty for my mural.
P.P.S. Can the disabled be evicted? *smirk*
Posted by beaconhell.com on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 6:51 PM
Now anyone that would go as far as taking their own shit and spreading it on the walls on someone else’s property just because they are mad at that person is a SICK individual. Most normal people that are mad at their landlord would normally leave garbage around or not clean the place up when they left. I know I wouldn’t want to be the person who had to clean Princess’s SHIT off of those walls. But unfortunately someone had to do it.
Princess doesn’t seem to realize that the things she does out of her anger affect people that have nothing to do with whoever caused her to be pissed off.
I don’t know if Princess really has Tourette’s Syndrome or not but If she does her illness
is not an excuse to treat people like that. If she is disabled , Why is she harassing and making fun of certain people on Murt’s blog who have a disability? Why does she feel she is better than they are.? Does she think by mentioning she has a disability that people are not going to blame her for her actions?
If she isn’t disabled then I think It is horrible of her to pretend she is so people will excuse her for her behavior.
Princess has made fun of Murt picking his boogers and picking his butt, But Princess has a bad habit herself. Princess PLAYS with her SHIT!!! Maybe people should post this all around the internet and put it on twitter to send to the whole world. I bet Poor little Princess won’t like it a bit. Am I right Princess. !!!! I would normally post were I found this info but I know that Princess loves to delete things off of the internet if it makes her look bad. That ok Princess, I made a copy of your posts.
I am going to use the words that Princess herself put on a post :
Stay tuned, more of your dirty laundry is going to be hanging out for the world to see what a creep you really are.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: THE INCIDENT REGARDING THE VANDALISM OF THE APARTMENT CAME FROM SEVERAL SOURCES OTHER THAN THE GUEST AUTHOR.
PRINCESS USES THE TERM "BOOGER EATER" TO DESCRIBE EVERYONE SHE HAS AN AGENDA AGAINST. IT IS MOST LIKELY THAT IT IS SHE THAT EATS HER OWN BOOGERS, PROBABLY ON THAT SHIT SHE IS ALLEGED TO PLAY WITH.
MURTWITNESSONE
Sunday, October 11, 2009
BECONHELL.COM CLAIMS CREDIT FOR PALTALK DAMAGE AND DENIAL OF SERVICE ATTACKS
EARLIER THIS EVENING I BEGAN TO EXPERIENCE A SERIES OF CRASHES OF MY PALTALK SCENE WHILE ATTEMPTING TO LOG INTO MY ROOM.
AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS AT ;LOGGING IN I STARTED GETTING NOTIFIED BY MEMBERS OF PALTALK OF THIS SET OF TWITTERS BEING POSTED AT TWITTER.COM BY THE OWNER OF BEACONHELL.COM
http://twitter.com/beaconhell
beaconhell
THIS IS A TWITTER ACCOUNT PURPORTED TO BE ANOTHER ONE BY THE OWNER OF BEACONHELL.COM, OR HER SENIOR STAFFER. NOTE THAT THERE IS MORE THAN ONE PALTALK LOCATION THAT IS THE TARGET OF THE "CLOAKER" PROGRAM.
http://twitter.com/Tards_United
Cloak Feeds being sent to Cloak Forum All users sign in using Cloak Name only!about 11 hours ago from TweetDeck
Cloaker Up feeding live streams of PM's and Chat to Cloaker Forumabout 14 hours ago from TweetDeck
woohoo new version works great!!
@DONEWITHMUTT I get it lol Too bad he doesn't. He'll never understand The Cloak10:03 AM Oct 5th from web in reply to DONEWITHMUTT
NOTE THE CLAIM OF BEING ABLE TO READ PRIVATE MESSAGES. THIS IS A SERIOUS FLAW ON THE PART OF PALTALK.COM IF TRUE
@DONEWITHMUTT I get it lol Too bad he doesn't. He'll never understand The Cloak
(BY PALTALK SUBSCRIBER OHIO LINDA)
Cloaked and ready to go10:01 AM Oct 5th ANOTHER CLAIM BY OHIO LINDA OF THE ABILITY TO CIRCUMVENT PALTALK.COM SERVICES
ZANLAUGHATYOU, A PERSONAL FRIEND OF THE OWNER OF BEACONHELL.COM AND ALLEGED TO BE BEHIND THE CREATION OF THIS UTILITY POSTED THIS ON TWITTER.COM
http://twitter.com/Zanlaughsatyou
@Michelle_McKee The proj caused the entire net to almost crash, it was AWESOME! :)about 10 hours ago from
Power Twitter in reply to Michelle_McKee
Up and running Cloaks delivered and ready Code B7XCOT5
IS THERE MONEY EXCHANGING HANDS FOR SERVICES RENDERED?
@beaconhell paypal check has cleared. $500.00 on the way.
MAKES ONE WONDER HOW DESPERATE SOMEONE IS TO GET A CHAT SITE SHUT DOWN.
EVEN MICHELLE MCKEE OF IN COLD BLOG SEEMS TO BE IN ON THIS ACTIVITY:
http://twitter.com/Michelle_McKee
Cloaker 69 good buddy. That's a big 10-4!
FIESTYOLDBROAD, A LONG TIME SUBSCRIBER OF PALTALK.COM ALSO IMPLICATED IN THE USE OF CLOAKER"
http://twitter.com/Feistyoldbroad
Cloaker 98 full action!about 17 hours ago from web
sending Princess my check = )about 17 hours ago from web
Thanks for the cloak
Cloak 349:28 PM Oct 10th from web
Cloak 42 guys!!!9:33 PM Oct 10th from web
THIS TWITTER USER RECENTLY PROTECTED HER TWEETS AFTER THIS ACCOUNT BEING OPEN, THIS ONE SLIPPED THROUGH:
Midnite02 @murtwitnessone How do you know it won't be BH that closed the room?
Midnite02 Cloakers now.
Midnite02 ^5 ALL Cloakers
Midnite02 @murtwitnessone We see you, but you can't see US.
Midnite02 Cloakers think you are just a prick. Are you trying to be Lenny with your hat on?
Midnite02 Cloaks on. Loving it!
Midnite02 @ChristinaL419 Happy to have you as a member of BH! No need for cloaks there. G'nite
Midnite02 @beaconhell We can see him but he can't see us. LMMFAO!!!
THIS IS THE LINK TO THE SOFTWARE THAT MAY BE IN USE BY THE MEMBERS OF BEACONHELL.COM TO BYPASS RESTRICTIONS OF PALTALK.COM
http://www.soft-files.com/identity-cloaker_64076.html
NOW, EVEN IF THIS TURNS OUT TO BE A HOAX, WHICH IS UNLIKELY. IT WILL DAMAGE THE INTEGRITY OF PALTALK.COM'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE A SAFE AND RELIABLE SERVICE TO IT'S PAYING CUSTOMERS.
PALTALK IS NOT FREE BEYOND A BASIC SERVICE. PRICES RANGE FROM AROUND 300.00 PER YEAR TO OVER 200.00 PER YEAR DEPENDING ON THE OPTIONS ORDERED.
COMMERCIAL CLIANTS CAN PAY INTO THE THOUSANDS OF DOLLERS PER YEAR FOR THE USE OF PALTALK.COM'S PREMIUM OFFERINGS.
AS NEWS SPREADS OF THIS NEW WEAKNESS OF PALTALK TO PROVIDE A QUALITY PRODUCT, SOME CUSTOMERS MAY LEAVE THE SERVICE AND GO TO A MORE RELIABLE SERVICE.
IF PALTALK FEELS THESE CLAIMS ARE NOT VALID, I WOULD SUGGEST THAT THEY INFORM THE PUBLIC OF THEIR PROOF AND DEAL WITH BEACONHELL.COM ACCORDINGLY.
IF PALTALK DOES NOT DEAL WITH THESE CLAIMS, THEY CAN EXPECT TO SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR INACTION.
MURT
AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS AT ;LOGGING IN I STARTED GETTING NOTIFIED BY MEMBERS OF PALTALK OF THIS SET OF TWITTERS BEING POSTED AT TWITTER.COM BY THE OWNER OF BEACONHELL.COM
http://twitter.com/beaconhell
beaconhell
Blocked — Unblock?
- Booger come back - I won't boot you no more. for realz14 minutes ago from Power Twitter
- hey dummie it's my new secret Paltalk weapon! KICK!21 minutes ago from Power Twitter
- someone having some issues staying online? Cloaker 1223 minutes ago from Power Twitter
- EVERYONE! Get in BB - Rebroadcasting NOW. 30 inv/using 4.9
- cv4.9 worked and PT wasn't disrupted. Thanks! Who all is still in?
- No way they can tell the number of cloaks in the room. ROCK!!
- @Midnite02 want me to push it forward another 10?
- v4.9 Cloaker_Cake can you give me calibration settings? Thanks.
- I know some of you get an allowance - I will accept partial payment on cloaker.about 13 hours (she is apparently charging for this program access)
- catastrophic failure: cloak to engage in 30 mins. Man stations.(this was around the time my room went down)
- BREAKING NEWS! cloak 76-3 worked. PT to be hit repeatedly @ 11:59 PM EST. Man your stations!about 13 hours ago from
Power Twitter - MONEY SEEMS TO BE BH MOTIVE HERE:
- Be warned: NSF checks will not be tolerated from you scoundrels! However, I will accept payments. TIAabout 13 hours ago from Power Twitter
- please join BH new video chat! It is $500 a year! It rules and I promise not to boot you.about 17 hours ago from Power Twitter
- @Zanlaughsatyou LOVE LOVE LOVE the new cloaking software.
- hey dummie it's my new secret Paltalk weapon! KICK! (THIS TWITTER OCCURED WITHIN MINUTES OF MY ROOM SHUTTING DOWN)
- he has NO clue about the cloaking software. I can see you stupid. tee hee 20 mins until Cloaker v4.9 is tested on PT.about 13 hours ago from Power Twitter
- (note for some reason after bringing this link over I am getting the numbers on the left. I do not know what is causing this or how to get rid of them, sorry.)
THIS IS A TWITTER ACCOUNT PURPORTED TO BE ANOTHER ONE BY THE OWNER OF BEACONHELL.COM, OR HER SENIOR STAFFER. NOTE THAT THERE IS MORE THAN ONE PALTALK LOCATION THAT IS THE TARGET OF THE "CLOAKER" PROGRAM.
http://twitter.com/Tards_United
Cloak Feeds being sent to Cloak Forum All users sign in using Cloak Name only!about 11 hours ago from TweetDeck
Cloaker Up feeding live streams of PM's and Chat to Cloaker Forumabout 14 hours ago from TweetDeck
woohoo new version works great!!
@DONEWITHMUTT I get it lol Too bad he doesn't. He'll never understand The Cloak10:03 AM Oct 5th from web in reply to DONEWITHMUTT
NOTE THE CLAIM OF BEING ABLE TO READ PRIVATE MESSAGES. THIS IS A SERIOUS FLAW ON THE PART OF PALTALK.COM IF TRUE
- To further implicate Beaconhell.com as having the ability of this nature, the following twitter was posted by another supporter of that blog:
DONEWITHMUTT
Blocked — Unblock?
- Cloaker I see you finally did it. Great job, see ya Murty. Carry On....7 minutes ago from web
- CLOAKER 69 good job with invisible kicking. See it working well on ole Murty.28 minutes ago from web:
- NOWHERE IN ANY POST ON TWITTER.COM IS THERE ANY REFRENCE TO THIS BEING A HOAX.
- NOTE EARLIER TWITTER POSTS FROM THIS MEMBER:
- Time for some rest. Cloaker if we are lucky there will be no Murty room left. Somehow I doubt it but we can hope. Cloaker 69about 17 hours ago from web
- THIS IS A DIRECT THREAT OF A SUPPORTER OF BEACONHELL.COM BY A PERSON WHO IS ALSO A PALTALK.COM SUBSCRIBER
@DONEWITHMUTT I get it lol Too bad he doesn't. He'll never understand The Cloak
(BY PALTALK SUBSCRIBER OHIO LINDA)
Cloaked and ready to go10:01 AM Oct 5th ANOTHER CLAIM BY OHIO LINDA OF THE ABILITY TO CIRCUMVENT PALTALK.COM SERVICES
ZANLAUGHATYOU, A PERSONAL FRIEND OF THE OWNER OF BEACONHELL.COM AND ALLEGED TO BE BEHIND THE CREATION OF THIS UTILITY POSTED THIS ON TWITTER.COM
http://twitter.com/Zanlaughsatyou
@Michelle_McKee The proj caused the entire net to almost crash, it was AWESOME! :)about 10 hours ago from
Power Twitter in reply to Michelle_McKeeUp and running Cloaks delivered and ready Code B7XCOT5
IS THERE MONEY EXCHANGING HANDS FOR SERVICES RENDERED?
@beaconhell paypal check has cleared. $500.00 on the way.
MAKES ONE WONDER HOW DESPERATE SOMEONE IS TO GET A CHAT SITE SHUT DOWN.
EVEN MICHELLE MCKEE OF IN COLD BLOG SEEMS TO BE IN ON THIS ACTIVITY:
http://twitter.com/Michelle_McKee
Cloaker 69 good buddy. That's a big 10-4!
FIESTYOLDBROAD, A LONG TIME SUBSCRIBER OF PALTALK.COM ALSO IMPLICATED IN THE USE OF CLOAKER"
http://twitter.com/Feistyoldbroad
Cloaker 98 full action!about 17 hours ago from web
sending Princess my check = )about 17 hours ago from web
Thanks for the cloak
Cloak 349:28 PM Oct 10th from web
Cloak 42 guys!!!9:33 PM Oct 10th from web
THIS TWITTER USER RECENTLY PROTECTED HER TWEETS AFTER THIS ACCOUNT BEING OPEN, THIS ONE SLIPPED THROUGH:
Midnite02 @murtwitnessone How do you know it won't be BH that closed the room?
Midnite02 Cloakers now.
Midnite02 ^5 ALL Cloakers
Midnite02 @murtwitnessone We see you, but you can't see US.
Midnite02 Cloakers think you are just a prick. Are you trying to be Lenny with your hat on?
Midnite02 Cloaks on. Loving it!
Midnite02 @ChristinaL419 Happy to have you as a member of BH! No need for cloaks there. G'nite
Midnite02 @beaconhell We can see him but he can't see us. LMMFAO!!!
THIS IS THE LINK TO THE SOFTWARE THAT MAY BE IN USE BY THE MEMBERS OF BEACONHELL.COM TO BYPASS RESTRICTIONS OF PALTALK.COM
http://www.soft-files.com/identity-cloaker_64076.html
NOW, EVEN IF THIS TURNS OUT TO BE A HOAX, WHICH IS UNLIKELY. IT WILL DAMAGE THE INTEGRITY OF PALTALK.COM'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE A SAFE AND RELIABLE SERVICE TO IT'S PAYING CUSTOMERS.
PALTALK IS NOT FREE BEYOND A BASIC SERVICE. PRICES RANGE FROM AROUND 300.00 PER YEAR TO OVER 200.00 PER YEAR DEPENDING ON THE OPTIONS ORDERED.
COMMERCIAL CLIANTS CAN PAY INTO THE THOUSANDS OF DOLLERS PER YEAR FOR THE USE OF PALTALK.COM'S PREMIUM OFFERINGS.
AS NEWS SPREADS OF THIS NEW WEAKNESS OF PALTALK TO PROVIDE A QUALITY PRODUCT, SOME CUSTOMERS MAY LEAVE THE SERVICE AND GO TO A MORE RELIABLE SERVICE.
IF PALTALK FEELS THESE CLAIMS ARE NOT VALID, I WOULD SUGGEST THAT THEY INFORM THE PUBLIC OF THEIR PROOF AND DEAL WITH BEACONHELL.COM ACCORDINGLY.
IF PALTALK DOES NOT DEAL WITH THESE CLAIMS, THEY CAN EXPECT TO SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR INACTION.
MURT
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)