An old pattern is repeating again that I do not quite understand. First I am banned from hell, then let back into hell (even though I did not go there) and then banned again.
I think the gates of hell should be replaced with revolving doors.
The fact the blog owner would go through all of this for an extremely tiney chat site among the tens of thousands of similar sites on the internet speaks for how wierd some people are on the net anymore.
Her members do not fare much better. Her blog numbers are consistantly low ( as measured by the comments section) when she writes articles of a "non-Murt" nature or where her members do not manage to insert a "Murt related" comment in an article that has nothing at all do do with me.
The LP memorial article is a prime example. That entire article and the comments that were added to it were a complete farce and a first rate example of yellow journalism.
This is not the first time that the, "you are banned" trick has been used. She has done this before. The last time this was done was preceded by a rather pecular "This site has been suspended by the host" webpage that went up. As the word spread about this revelation, a good number of pro-Murt posters went over there to see for thenselves.
They soon found out the true purpose of what I call the "suspended by host" webpage.
In a rather odd concidence, within a couple of days, virtualy everyone who viewed that link found themselves getting a "you have been banned" message from the blog owner by means of the same sort of webpage.
Anyone who did not visit the "Suspended by host" page, once it was taken down, was not banned as long as they did not post, or made any favorable posts regarding me.
There seems to be a repeat of this pattern, dispensing with the "suspended by host" webpage or something similar since the blog now seems to be able to read the ip address of anyone even looking around on the site or more likely, another way is being found for the blog owner to obtain ip information of those not welcome to the site for pre-emptive banning.
I can find no other explination how an ip address can be banned if it has never been to the website and the owner of the ip has never been to said website or otherwise been in contact with the blog owner.
Perhaps some hackers have provided the necessary information? It would be nice to know.
Monday, April 13, 2009
Sunday, April 12, 2009
PIGEONS
Well, I seemed to have acquired a new gift, quite by accident. I had some homing pigeons (actually they are carrier pigeons)left here a while back. As with all carrier pigeons, they went home after they were given their messages.
An unexpected thing happened. One of them laid eggs and with the help of a friend, the eggs hatched, the pigeons grew up. My friend, an expert on carrier pigeons, taught me all about them.
We did some test releases and they came back to the roost quite promptly.
Needless to say I was hooked. With my experts help, I have acquired a number of them.
I now give them to those who visit to take back to their place. Since these are actually carrier pigeons, they bring back messages.
In order to avoid messy situations, my expert friend made it so that the pigeons do not lay eggs when they are away from the roost.
I have recieved the most interesting messages when they return.
Well, time to feed the birds.
An unexpected thing happened. One of them laid eggs and with the help of a friend, the eggs hatched, the pigeons grew up. My friend, an expert on carrier pigeons, taught me all about them.
We did some test releases and they came back to the roost quite promptly.
Needless to say I was hooked. With my experts help, I have acquired a number of them.
I now give them to those who visit to take back to their place. Since these are actually carrier pigeons, they bring back messages.
In order to avoid messy situations, my expert friend made it so that the pigeons do not lay eggs when they are away from the roost.
I have recieved the most interesting messages when they return.
Well, time to feed the birds.
IT IS GETTING HOT IN HELL AGAIN
Somebody is running skeered. I wonder why? afraid of unintended consequenses? Oh me oh my. There is a site that supposadly does not ban people who choose to view their site. This even if no comments are posted.
Apparently that is a lie as is all the content there. The interesting thing about all of this is that there is already a private chat and message board where their crimes are planned and their lies told. They should rename that place "The Twilight Zone. I wonder why they are so scared of that they have to lock the outside gate as well. Makes one wonder.
No problem. I have my homing pigeons to keep me busy.
HAPPY EASTER
Apparently that is a lie as is all the content there. The interesting thing about all of this is that there is already a private chat and message board where their crimes are planned and their lies told. They should rename that place "The Twilight Zone. I wonder why they are so scared of that they have to lock the outside gate as well. Makes one wonder.
No problem. I have my homing pigeons to keep me busy.
HAPPY EASTER
Saturday, April 11, 2009
IT JUST KEEPS COMING
I just recieved this excerpt from a blog post:
Incidently, the person who did that Identified himself as Renzolovescake. The other person there was Kfcfan. The PM's (edited)associated with this and the other incident are out on the internet.
Incidently, the person who did that Identified himself as Renzolovescake. The other person there was Kfcfan. The PM's (edited)associated with this and the other incident are out on the internet.
Whoops again. To serve or not to serve
I, for the life of me, cannot figgure out why the heck this even matters. As a matter of fact both me and my wife were called along with just about every person who is eligable for jury duty. We both declined serving and it is a moot point since the venue was changed out of Lake county.
I have always declined jury duty since I frequently travel and cannot take the time off. My wife declined due to not being able to be impartial in hearing the case.
The bimbo wrote;
YOU WERE NEVER CALLED FOR JURY DUTY FOR THE COUEY TRIAL, f**kWAD. YOU STOLE THAT STORY FROM SOMEONE WHO HATED YOU WHO ACTUALLY WAS CALLED FOR JURY DUTY FOR THE COUEY TRIAL.
This is a matter of public record, check it out.
WHOOPS
The following poster made the same exact mistake she made almost 3 years ago:
MURT IS A f**kING LIAR!
1. Yes, Murt - you did indeed tell the family of Trenton Duckett that you knew where he was, and that he was to be rescued shortly by a law enforcement raid on a residence one mile west of Loves Creations. Remember that? WE DO!
WHO IS WE? I NEVER SAID ANY SUCH THING. AGAIN THIS WAS A HIGH PROFILE MISSING CHILD CASE WITHIN THE SAME COUNTY I LIVED IN AND THE PERSON I HAD TELEPHONIC CONTACT WITH IS THE WIFE OF A RETIRED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. A LITTLE COMMON SENSE HERE, FOLKS.
2. Yes, Murt - you did indeed tell another member of TT that you were a US Marshall. Remember that? WE DO.
UH, RIGHT, AGAIN, NATIONAL CASE AND AFTER 911.
3. Speaking of being followed. Murt, you stated a couple of years ago that YOU were being satalked by a lady in a black SUV. You said that the “surveillance camera” that you had trained on your property had recorded this lady driving a black SUV in front of your house.
What’s interesting about this is the lady you were referring to DID NOT drive the black SUV anywhere near your property, because even though a vehicle of that description was registered in her name, it was not the vehicle that she drove - but the vehicle another member of her family drove on a regular basis.
You f**ked up with that one, Murt. Because at that point WE knew that you had run her name - illegally I might add - through you dealer database.
THIS IS WHERE THESE PEOPLE MESSED UP. I NEVER IDENTIFIED BY NAME WHO THE DRIVER WAS. I SIMPLY SAID A WOMAN DRIVING A BLACK SUV.
IT WAS THEY WHO CAME BACK AND SAID THAT "SHE" DOES NOT DRIVE A BLACK SUV.
ANOTHER POINT HERE. I AM ACCUSED OF CHECKING THE INDIVIDUAL'S TAG USING MY DEALERSHIP. THIS DID NOT HAPPEN FOR TWO REASONS:
FIRST: FLORIDA HAS A SYSTEM CALLED TAG TALK. IF I MAKE A TAG OR VIN CHECK USING THIS SYSTEM, IT IS RECORDED SINCE I HAVE TO PAY A FEE FOR THE SERVICE AND IT IS THE LAW. IF I CHECKED THAT TAG THERE WOULD BE A RECORD OF IT, THERE IS NOT.
SECOND: IN ORDER TO CHECK THE TAG, I WOULD HAVE TO HAVE THE TAG NUMBER. SINCE I DO NOT, TO THIS DAY,KNOW WHERE THE PERSON IN QUESTION LIVES, I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO CHECK THAT TAG UNLESS THE VEHICLE HAD BEEN AT MY RESIDENCE.
YOU f**k!
WE will NEVER stop watching you, you f**k. We will watch you, we will do everything we can keep you from exploiting the children and families you prey on.
(Oh, and to add: we KNOW you never had surveillance, dumbass. We checked. Carefully, and with much amusement. Maybe I’ll post a pic.)
OH REALLY?
TWO POINTS HERE. YOU JUST DENIED THAT I WAS NOT BEING FOLLOWED OR SPIED UPON. IN ORDER TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION YOU WOULD HAVE TO HAVE BEEN ON MY PROPERTY. THAT IS CALLED BURGLERY AND STALKING.
YOU SOUND LIKE THE SAME WOMAN WHO HAD HER PHOTO TAKEN PEEKING THROUGH THE WINDOW OF THE BEDROOM OF A MISSING CHILD.
THE CAMERA THAT CAUGHT THE SUV WAS HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT. TO BAD YOU MISSED IT.
A TREND OF THE WORST ORDER.
ANDREA YATES, SUSAN SMITH, MELIDNA DUCKETT, CASEY ANTHONY AND NOW MELISA HUCKABY.
The names most prominent in an odd new trend. Mothers who kill children. One statistic has it that 200 women kill their children each year. I am not sure where Melisa Huckaby fits into this stastic but she might as well have been a second mother to Sandra.
No longer is the predator only a man who kisses a 6 year old, or the man who lures children with ice cream and money or to help him find a lost puppy.
The predator is now the mother of a child's best friend, the mother of your grandchild, the mother of your child or the sunday school teacher where your daughter goes to play with her best friend?
We all know the warnings. Be aware of where your child is at all times. Know who the child is and know all you can about the adults around the friend she plays with.
The question now is, If you cannot trust a female sunday school teacher from your church with whom your daughter plays with her daughter, who can you trust.
The ultimate answer we now await is why Sandra? What is it about her that sealed her face at the hands of yet another alleged female killer?
We now impatiently wait.
The names most prominent in an odd new trend. Mothers who kill children. One statistic has it that 200 women kill their children each year. I am not sure where Melisa Huckaby fits into this stastic but she might as well have been a second mother to Sandra.
No longer is the predator only a man who kisses a 6 year old, or the man who lures children with ice cream and money or to help him find a lost puppy.
The predator is now the mother of a child's best friend, the mother of your grandchild, the mother of your child or the sunday school teacher where your daughter goes to play with her best friend?
We all know the warnings. Be aware of where your child is at all times. Know who the child is and know all you can about the adults around the friend she plays with.
The question now is, If you cannot trust a female sunday school teacher from your church with whom your daughter plays with her daughter, who can you trust.
The ultimate answer we now await is why Sandra? What is it about her that sealed her face at the hands of yet another alleged female killer?
We now impatiently wait.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Joshua Monoxide Melton,
I have no words to describe you, your acts of insanity or your compulsive meanness towards other human beings. The night you begged Murt to kill himself on camera was the final straw for me, BUT you topped yourself with that one when you went after SBD's daughter. I called you on it and you couldn't stand that someone would dare take a stand against you. Then you got nosy and read my PM's which you have written in your own words that you would "never do."