"Sometiimes knowing the right answer is knowing the right question."
From Wikipedia:
An unregistered trade mark is a trademark which does not benefit from the protection afforded to trade marks through registration.
In the United States, registration, both federal or state, is not required to obtain rights in a trademark. An unregistered mark may still receive common law trademark rights. Those rights, for example, may extend to its area of influence—usually delineated by geography. As such, multiple parties may simultaneously use a mark throughout the country or even state. An unregistered mark may also be protected under the federal "Lanham Act" (15 USC § 1125) prohibition against commercial misrepresentation of source or origins of goods.
MURT
Sunday, January 10, 2010
How:"I know my way around a ban."
Some of you may recall when this remark was made in my room and then made it's way into a viral recording on Youtube. At the time we all thought that she meant that she could sign in under a black name and come into the room that way. Hell we all knew that.
This recent discovery of the multiple usernames similar to the ones I use brings that little slip of the tongue to the forefront. Not only does someone "know their way around a ban" but they seem to "know their way around passwords" and thus "know how to create hoax pm's."
Now,I am not, for one minute accusing the person who made that statement. I am using that example as a reminder of how weak Paltalk security is and just how easy it is for someone to come into Paltalk for whatever purpose and fool readers into thinking that a username is real when it is, in fact NOT.
There has been a widespread use of impersonator usernames and rooms lately. The changes are subtle and require close examination to determine who is real and who is not. This harkens to the old days when my chat room was PRIVATE yet someone always seemed to know their way around that. I attributed it to someone being able to hack into Paltalk. Instead, it may have been as simple as someone giving out PRIVATE information entrusted to them.
A certain someone who wrote in a blog a long, long time ago "He thinks I am his best friend, but personally I can't stand him." It was this comment that got me looking until I found my answer.
MURT
This recent discovery of the multiple usernames similar to the ones I use brings that little slip of the tongue to the forefront. Not only does someone "know their way around a ban" but they seem to "know their way around passwords" and thus "know how to create hoax pm's."
Now,I am not, for one minute accusing the person who made that statement. I am using that example as a reminder of how weak Paltalk security is and just how easy it is for someone to come into Paltalk for whatever purpose and fool readers into thinking that a username is real when it is, in fact NOT.
There has been a widespread use of impersonator usernames and rooms lately. The changes are subtle and require close examination to determine who is real and who is not. This harkens to the old days when my chat room was PRIVATE yet someone always seemed to know their way around that. I attributed it to someone being able to hack into Paltalk. Instead, it may have been as simple as someone giving out PRIVATE information entrusted to them.
A certain someone who wrote in a blog a long, long time ago "He thinks I am his best friend, but personally I can't stand him." It was this comment that got me looking until I found my answer.
MURT
THE NAME GAME
ANON: PALTALK.COM SAYS USERNAMES CANNOT BE IMPERSONATED.
OH???????????
WELL. GEE. WOULD SOMEONE KINDLY EXPLAIN HOW THESE TWO NAMES ARE NOT ALIKE? I WOULD CERTAINLY APPRECIATE IT.
MURT
OH???????????
MURT
Saturday, January 9, 2010
SO BE IT
For some strange reason three of the detractors one who is using the name of my Paltalk chat room and the other a dishonorable former administrator insist on leaving comments. Then, in spite of the policy notice I place above the comment window throw tantrums when I do not publish their posts.
I had decided to give them the courtesy of giving them a response without publishing their comments but they seem not to be happy with that. They insist that I am talking to myself when I respond to them. This is a lie on their part (so what is new? ) because THEY MADE THE COMMENT so they know that I am not, in fact, talking to myself.I have all the comments in archive so their lies could be exposed in an instant. I have also seen some of their comments wind up elsewhere with the "since he will not allow me to comment" tantrum thrown in for good measure thus exposing their lie.
The reason I am even addressing this minor issue is to point out that they will LIE ABOUT ANYTHING. They keep accusing me of LYING when it is, in fact, THEM that are doing all the LYING.
Well, so be it. In order to keep from being accused of "talking to myself" I will no longer respond to comments that I feel are from these individuals that do not get published.
There are a number of people who DO comment but do not want to be published. In those instances I will have to bear the charge of "talking to my self" when I choose to respond to them.
I honestly do not understand why these nuts continue. I am off the air, the news van is going to be retrofitted for spot leasing so the road trips are done, and I am NOT going to do any more public webcasts for the time being.
There is one obvious answer that NANANC gave a long time ago. She even provided the data to prove it. A certain blogger's traffic on her blog TANKS. The readership levels and comment levels TANK when this blogger does NOT attack me.
When she starts in on me her readership (among her minions) soar.
I think it is SHE who does not know how to run a blog or website since she cannot survive without smearing someone.
MURT
I had decided to give them the courtesy of giving them a response without publishing their comments but they seem not to be happy with that. They insist that I am talking to myself when I respond to them. This is a lie on their part (so what is new? ) because THEY MADE THE COMMENT so they know that I am not, in fact, talking to myself.I have all the comments in archive so their lies could be exposed in an instant. I have also seen some of their comments wind up elsewhere with the "since he will not allow me to comment" tantrum thrown in for good measure thus exposing their lie.
The reason I am even addressing this minor issue is to point out that they will LIE ABOUT ANYTHING. They keep accusing me of LYING when it is, in fact, THEM that are doing all the LYING.
Well, so be it. In order to keep from being accused of "talking to myself" I will no longer respond to comments that I feel are from these individuals that do not get published.
There are a number of people who DO comment but do not want to be published. In those instances I will have to bear the charge of "talking to my self" when I choose to respond to them.
I honestly do not understand why these nuts continue. I am off the air, the news van is going to be retrofitted for spot leasing so the road trips are done, and I am NOT going to do any more public webcasts for the time being.
There is one obvious answer that NANANC gave a long time ago. She even provided the data to prove it. A certain blogger's traffic on her blog TANKS. The readership levels and comment levels TANK when this blogger does NOT attack me.
When she starts in on me her readership (among her minions) soar.
I think it is SHE who does not know how to run a blog or website since she cannot survive without smearing someone.
MURT
Friday, January 8, 2010
IT IS OK TO LIE
Just got a curious comment from the person who is using my Murthavenflorida username on youtube. According to this person, who knows full well I have been using this name on my Paltalk account (registered domain) by the way, can ignore that AND LIE OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
Her and her minions then have the unmitigated gall to come after me for LYING? I guess it is ok for them to lie for their own purposes, the rights of others be damned.
At least now we have the true colors of who these people are.
MURT
Her and her minions then have the unmitigated gall to come after me for LYING? I guess it is ok for them to lie for their own purposes, the rights of others be damned.
At least now we have the true colors of who these people are.
MURT
Thursday, January 7, 2010
TRUTH
THE DETRACTORS ARE NOT INTERESTED IN IT BUT HERE IT IS ANYWAY.
THE PM'S WERE TAMPERED WITH. PERIOD.
I ONCE HAD A ADMIN AND A NUMBER OF MODS.
THE ADMIN WAS TRUSTED WITH BOTH MY ROOM PASSWORD AND MY MAIN ACCOUNT PASSWORD
THE HOAX PM'S WERE CREATED WHEN I WAS NOT AT HOME OR ON THE COMPUTER.
THE HOAX PM'S WERE PUBLISHED ON A BLOG OVER A YEAR AGO.
I CHANGED MY PALTALK ROOM NAME FROM MURTWITNESSONELIVE TO MURTHAVENFLORIDA AND REGISTERED THE NAME MURTHAVENFLORIDA.COM THROUGH PALTALK AND GODADDY.COM
A FORMER MODERATOR AND ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL ATTEMPTED TO GAIN ENTRY INTO MY OLD MURTWITNESSONE ROOM USING A PASSWORD THAT WAS NO LONGER VALID.
WITHIN 24 HOURS OF MY CHANGING MY MURTHAVENFLORIDA PALTALK ROOM PASSWORD AND MY ACCOUNT PASSWORD AND SECURITY QUESTION, THE SMEARS BY A FORMER ADMIN BEGAN.
THE "SUDDEN" REVELATION ABOUT THE "PM'S" BEGAN THEN, NOT 14 MONTHS AGO.
ODD COINCIDENCES. THE "CENTRAL FLORIDA" MARKET CONSISTS OF WELL OVER A MILLION PEOPLE, YET OUT OF ALL THOSE PEOPLE I MANAGED TO FIND A "MODERATOR" WHO COINCIDENTALLY HAD A RELATIVE 4 HOUSES AWAY FROM A NATIONALLY PROMINENT MURDER SCENE. THE ODDS OF THIS BEING A RANDOM INCIDENT ARE ABOUT THE SAME AS THAT OF WINNING THE LOTTERY.
THERE WERE RUMORS CIRCULATING OF A RATHER "UNIQUE" VIEWPOINT AND FRIENDSHIP ATTRIBUTED TO A CERTAIN SOMEON TIED TO THIS LONG SHOT "COINCIDENCE."
MORE OF A SETUP THAN A COINCIDENCE, I THINK. SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT.
MURT
THE PM'S WERE TAMPERED WITH. PERIOD.
I ONCE HAD A ADMIN AND A NUMBER OF MODS.
THE ADMIN WAS TRUSTED WITH BOTH MY ROOM PASSWORD AND MY MAIN ACCOUNT PASSWORD
THE HOAX PM'S WERE CREATED WHEN I WAS NOT AT HOME OR ON THE COMPUTER.
THE HOAX PM'S WERE PUBLISHED ON A BLOG OVER A YEAR AGO.
I CHANGED MY PALTALK ROOM NAME FROM MURTWITNESSONELIVE TO MURTHAVENFLORIDA AND REGISTERED THE NAME MURTHAVENFLORIDA.COM THROUGH PALTALK AND GODADDY.COM
A FORMER MODERATOR AND ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL ATTEMPTED TO GAIN ENTRY INTO MY OLD MURTWITNESSONE ROOM USING A PASSWORD THAT WAS NO LONGER VALID.
WITHIN 24 HOURS OF MY CHANGING MY MURTHAVENFLORIDA PALTALK ROOM PASSWORD AND MY ACCOUNT PASSWORD AND SECURITY QUESTION, THE SMEARS BY A FORMER ADMIN BEGAN.
THE "SUDDEN" REVELATION ABOUT THE "PM'S" BEGAN THEN, NOT 14 MONTHS AGO.
ODD COINCIDENCES. THE "CENTRAL FLORIDA" MARKET CONSISTS OF WELL OVER A MILLION PEOPLE, YET OUT OF ALL THOSE PEOPLE I MANAGED TO FIND A "MODERATOR" WHO COINCIDENTALLY HAD A RELATIVE 4 HOUSES AWAY FROM A NATIONALLY PROMINENT MURDER SCENE. THE ODDS OF THIS BEING A RANDOM INCIDENT ARE ABOUT THE SAME AS THAT OF WINNING THE LOTTERY.
THERE WERE RUMORS CIRCULATING OF A RATHER "UNIQUE" VIEWPOINT AND FRIENDSHIP ATTRIBUTED TO A CERTAIN SOMEON TIED TO THIS LONG SHOT "COINCIDENCE."
MORE OF A SETUP THAN A COINCIDENCE, I THINK. SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT.
MURT
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)